The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Ursodeoxycholic acid to reduce adverse perinatal outcomes for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: the PITCHES RCT

Ursodeoxycholic acid to reduce adverse perinatal outcomes for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: the PITCHES RCT
Ursodeoxycholic acid to reduce adverse perinatal outcomes for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: the PITCHES RCT
Background
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, characterised by maternal pruritus and raised serum bile acid concentrations, is associated with increased rates of stillbirth, preterm birth and neonatal unit admission. Ursodeoxycholic acid is widely used as a treatment, but without an adequate evidence base.
Objective
We aimed to evaluate whether or not ursodeoxycholic acid reduces adverse perinatal outcomes in affected women.
Design
Multicentre, masked, randomised, placebo-controlled, two-arm, parallel-group trial.
Setting
Thirty-three UK maternity units.
Participants
Women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy aged ≥ 18 years, between 20+0 and 40+6 weeks’ gestation with a singleton or twin pregnancy and no known lethal fetal anomaly.
Interventions
Women were randomly assigned (1 : 1 allocation ratio) to take ursodeoxycholic acid tablets or matched placebo tablets, at an equivalent dose of 1000 mg daily, titrated as needed.
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome was a composite of perinatal death (in utero fetal death after randomisation or known neonatal death up to 7 days) or preterm delivery (< 37 weeks’ gestation) or neonatal unit admission for at least 4 hours (from birth until hospital discharge). Each infant was counted once within this composite. Analyses were by intention to treat.
Results
Between 23 December 2015 and 7 August 2018, 605 women were randomised, with 305 women allocated to the ursodeoxycholic acid arm and 300 women to the placebo arm. There was no evidence of a significant difference in the incidence of the primary outcome between the groups: 23.0% (74 out of 322 infants) in the ursodeoxycholic acid group compared with 26.7% (85 out of 318 infants) in the placebo group; adjusted risk ratio 0.85 (95% confidence interval 0.62 to 1.15). There was no evidence of a significant difference in total costs (maternal, infant and the cost of ursodeoxycholic acid) between the two trial groups. There were two serious adverse events in the ursodeoxycholic acid group and six in the placebo group.
Limitations
Limitations include a primary outcome event rate in the control group that was lower than that estimated for the sample size calculation, but the lack of evidence of effect in all analyses suggests that it is unlikely that the trial had insufficient power.
Conclusions
In this clinical trial of ursodeoxycholic acid in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, there is no evidence that it is effective in reducing a composite of adverse perinatal outcomes.
Future work
Future research should aim to elucidate the aetiology and pathophysiology of adverse perinatal outcomes, particularly stillbirth, in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy to assist the development of an effective preventative treatment. Further exploratory analyses may identify groups of women who might respond to ursodeoxycholic acid treatment.
Chappell, LC
9fd8cd5c-5803-4a0d-8f2a-d1a143113cd8
Bell, JL
f0afaed3-1325-4d37-a934-a63e581ebda3
Smith, A
cf4d3f00-440f-4e95-a95a-407ef53793fa
Rounding, Catherine
21b05f79-8ab1-4dd7-bcd3-8363041c849d
Bowler, U
49570c44-66b8-4121-a220-3de7e6cf1a0d
Linsell, L
bf220517-49cd-4fbb-8666-19d2a1de1257
Juszczak, Edmund
9267758e-8ab8-44c7-ab14-48ef82fa6b6e
Tohill, S
a8ecd092-0392-4c0f-a460-0f28e2439f89
Redford, A
c3a9396e-a3f6-4cfb-91b6-dcba5d807b7d
Dixon, PH
57197420-4a59-4992-8932-d60a38e05bd8
Chambers, Jenny
75c026d3-7934-4281-a50a-9f2b2e637325
Hunter, Rachael
155068d4-d49a-4180-8eb0-0c549aa7f95c
Dorling, J
e55dcb9a-a798-41a1-8753-9e9ff8aab630
Thornton, JG
6b52d3bd-2733-43b5-ba22-519868ec2a23
Chappell, LC
9fd8cd5c-5803-4a0d-8f2a-d1a143113cd8
Bell, JL
f0afaed3-1325-4d37-a934-a63e581ebda3
Smith, A
cf4d3f00-440f-4e95-a95a-407ef53793fa
Rounding, Catherine
21b05f79-8ab1-4dd7-bcd3-8363041c849d
Bowler, U
49570c44-66b8-4121-a220-3de7e6cf1a0d
Linsell, L
bf220517-49cd-4fbb-8666-19d2a1de1257
Juszczak, Edmund
9267758e-8ab8-44c7-ab14-48ef82fa6b6e
Tohill, S
a8ecd092-0392-4c0f-a460-0f28e2439f89
Redford, A
c3a9396e-a3f6-4cfb-91b6-dcba5d807b7d
Dixon, PH
57197420-4a59-4992-8932-d60a38e05bd8
Chambers, Jenny
75c026d3-7934-4281-a50a-9f2b2e637325
Hunter, Rachael
155068d4-d49a-4180-8eb0-0c549aa7f95c
Dorling, J
e55dcb9a-a798-41a1-8753-9e9ff8aab630
Thornton, JG
6b52d3bd-2733-43b5-ba22-519868ec2a23

Chappell, LC, Bell, JL, Smith, A, Rounding, Catherine, Bowler, U, Linsell, L, Juszczak, Edmund, Tohill, S, Redford, A, Dixon, PH, Chambers, Jenny, Hunter, Rachael, Dorling, J and Thornton, JG (2020) Ursodeoxycholic acid to reduce adverse perinatal outcomes for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: the PITCHES RCT ,

Record type: Book

Abstract

Background
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, characterised by maternal pruritus and raised serum bile acid concentrations, is associated with increased rates of stillbirth, preterm birth and neonatal unit admission. Ursodeoxycholic acid is widely used as a treatment, but without an adequate evidence base.
Objective
We aimed to evaluate whether or not ursodeoxycholic acid reduces adverse perinatal outcomes in affected women.
Design
Multicentre, masked, randomised, placebo-controlled, two-arm, parallel-group trial.
Setting
Thirty-three UK maternity units.
Participants
Women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy aged ≥ 18 years, between 20+0 and 40+6 weeks’ gestation with a singleton or twin pregnancy and no known lethal fetal anomaly.
Interventions
Women were randomly assigned (1 : 1 allocation ratio) to take ursodeoxycholic acid tablets or matched placebo tablets, at an equivalent dose of 1000 mg daily, titrated as needed.
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome was a composite of perinatal death (in utero fetal death after randomisation or known neonatal death up to 7 days) or preterm delivery (< 37 weeks’ gestation) or neonatal unit admission for at least 4 hours (from birth until hospital discharge). Each infant was counted once within this composite. Analyses were by intention to treat.
Results
Between 23 December 2015 and 7 August 2018, 605 women were randomised, with 305 women allocated to the ursodeoxycholic acid arm and 300 women to the placebo arm. There was no evidence of a significant difference in the incidence of the primary outcome between the groups: 23.0% (74 out of 322 infants) in the ursodeoxycholic acid group compared with 26.7% (85 out of 318 infants) in the placebo group; adjusted risk ratio 0.85 (95% confidence interval 0.62 to 1.15). There was no evidence of a significant difference in total costs (maternal, infant and the cost of ursodeoxycholic acid) between the two trial groups. There were two serious adverse events in the ursodeoxycholic acid group and six in the placebo group.
Limitations
Limitations include a primary outcome event rate in the control group that was lower than that estimated for the sample size calculation, but the lack of evidence of effect in all analyses suggests that it is unlikely that the trial had insufficient power.
Conclusions
In this clinical trial of ursodeoxycholic acid in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, there is no evidence that it is effective in reducing a composite of adverse perinatal outcomes.
Future work
Future research should aim to elucidate the aetiology and pathophysiology of adverse perinatal outcomes, particularly stillbirth, in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy to assist the development of an effective preventative treatment. Further exploratory analyses may identify groups of women who might respond to ursodeoxycholic acid treatment.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 8 December 2020

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 494265
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/494265
PURE UUID: 975a8b63-a1a6-4c4d-a667-50a9eaffaa2d
ORCID for J Dorling: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1691-3221

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 Oct 2024 16:55
Last modified: 03 Oct 2024 02:07

Export record

Contributors

Author: LC Chappell
Author: JL Bell
Author: A Smith
Author: Catherine Rounding
Author: U Bowler
Author: L Linsell
Author: Edmund Juszczak
Author: S Tohill
Author: A Redford
Author: PH Dixon
Author: Jenny Chambers
Author: Rachael Hunter
Author: J Dorling ORCID iD
Author: JG Thornton

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×