The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The 'policy-preferences model': a new perspective on how researchers can facilitate the take-up of evidence by educational policy makers

The 'policy-preferences model': a new perspective on how researchers can facilitate the take-up of evidence by educational policy makers
The 'policy-preferences model': a new perspective on how researchers can facilitate the take-up of evidence by educational policy makers

The phrase 'knowledge adoption' refers to the often-complicated process by which policy makers 'take on board' evidence. While models have been put forward to explain this activity, this paper argues that such models are flawed and fail to fully address those complexities affecting the successful realisation of knowledge adoption efforts. Existing frameworks are examined, critiqued and an alternative, sociologically based approach presented. It is argued that this alternative conceptualisation provides a more effective account of the knowledge adoption process. The paper illustrates how this model has been tested and examines its implications for both research impact and evidence-informed policy making.

Evidence use, Evidence-informed policy, Knowledge mobilisation, Research impact
1744-2648
455-472
Brown, Chris
42bbe788-54bf-4081-8c18-ead8b554f0fd
Brown, Chris
42bbe788-54bf-4081-8c18-ead8b554f0fd

Brown, Chris (2012) The 'policy-preferences model': a new perspective on how researchers can facilitate the take-up of evidence by educational policy makers. Evidence and Policy, 8 (4), 455-472. (doi:10.1332/174426412X660106).

Record type: Review

Abstract

The phrase 'knowledge adoption' refers to the often-complicated process by which policy makers 'take on board' evidence. While models have been put forward to explain this activity, this paper argues that such models are flawed and fail to fully address those complexities affecting the successful realisation of knowledge adoption efforts. Existing frameworks are examined, critiqued and an alternative, sociologically based approach presented. It is argued that this alternative conceptualisation provides a more effective account of the knowledge adoption process. The paper illustrates how this model has been tested and examines its implications for both research impact and evidence-informed policy making.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: November 2012
Keywords: Evidence use, Evidence-informed policy, Knowledge mobilisation, Research impact

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 494291
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/494291
ISSN: 1744-2648
PURE UUID: 541ee746-7a0e-405a-a7d1-21d0db308f7b
ORCID for Chris Brown: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9759-9624

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Oct 2024 16:41
Last modified: 04 Oct 2024 02:09

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Chris Brown ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×