The analysis of drawing from memory performance in brain-damaged patients
The analysis of drawing from memory performance in brain-damaged patients
The drawing from memory task is frequently used in cognitive neuropsychology to investigate visual processing impairments. However, in surprising contrast to most other neuropsychological tests, the analyses of results on this task are most often based solely on qualitative judgements about the normality of a patient's performance. In most case reports, these judgements are not made with reference to normative data and are not made by individuals who are impartial with respect to the study (that is, using a blind rating procedure). There are several grounds for arguing that such analyses are inadequate. First, seemingly abnormal drawings made by a patient may well be within the range of performance shown by control subjects. Second, judgments that are not based on a blind rating procedure are likely to be influenced by knowledge about the patient's performance on other tasks. We describe an alternative assessment procedure that addresses both of these concerns. (C) 2000 Academic Press.
310 - 315
Leek, E.C.
6f63c405-e28f-4f8c-8ead-3b0a79c7dc88
Rapp, B.C.
fee165c9-3d3b-4943-bb14-9c6a79f94300
Turnbull, O.H.
240e2f77-8509-48da-8e9b-1d80419acd14
1 June 2000
Leek, E.C.
6f63c405-e28f-4f8c-8ead-3b0a79c7dc88
Rapp, B.C.
fee165c9-3d3b-4943-bb14-9c6a79f94300
Turnbull, O.H.
240e2f77-8509-48da-8e9b-1d80419acd14
Leek, E.C., Rapp, B.C. and Turnbull, O.H.
(2000)
The analysis of drawing from memory performance in brain-damaged patients.
Brain and Cognition, 43 (1-3), .
Abstract
The drawing from memory task is frequently used in cognitive neuropsychology to investigate visual processing impairments. However, in surprising contrast to most other neuropsychological tests, the analyses of results on this task are most often based solely on qualitative judgements about the normality of a patient's performance. In most case reports, these judgements are not made with reference to normative data and are not made by individuals who are impartial with respect to the study (that is, using a blind rating procedure). There are several grounds for arguing that such analyses are inadequate. First, seemingly abnormal drawings made by a patient may well be within the range of performance shown by control subjects. Second, judgments that are not based on a blind rating procedure are likely to be influenced by knowledge about the patient's performance on other tasks. We describe an alternative assessment procedure that addresses both of these concerns. (C) 2000 Academic Press.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 June 2000
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 494414
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/494414
PURE UUID: bdbb0fb0-7037-401c-847e-805dfa96e333
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Oct 2024 17:18
Last modified: 09 Nov 2024 03:12
Export record
Contributors
Author:
E.C. Leek
Author:
B.C. Rapp
Author:
O.H. Turnbull
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics