Insights into the spectrum of transtibial prosthetic socket design from expert clinicians and their digital records
Insights into the spectrum of transtibial prosthetic socket design from expert clinicians and their digital records
Background: transtibial prosthetic sockets are often grouped into patella tendon bearing (PTB) or total surface bearing (TSB) designs, but many variations in rectifications are used to apply these principles to an individual's personalised socket. Prosthetists currently have little objective evidence to assist them as they make design choices.
Aims: to compare rectifications made by experienced prosthetists across a range of patient demographics and limb shapes to improve understanding of socket design strategies.
Methodology: 163 residual limb surface scans and corresponding CAD/CAM sockets were analysed for 134 randomly selected individuals in a UK prosthetics service. This included 142 PTB and 21 TSB designs. The limb and socket scans were compared to determine the location and size of rectifications. Rectifications were compiled for PTB and TSB designs, and associations between different rectification sizes were assessed using a variety of methods including linear regression, kernel density estimation (KDE) and a Naïve Bayes (NB) classification.
Results: differences in design features were apparent between PTB and TSB sockets, notably for paratibial carves, gross volume reduction and distal end elongation. However, socket designs varied across a spectrum, with most showing a hybrid of the PTB and TSB principles. Pairwise correlations were observed between the size of some rectifications (e.g., paratibial carves; fibular head build and gross volume reduction). Conversely, the patellar tendon carve depth was not associated significantly with any other rectification, indicating its relative design insensitivity. The Naïve Bayes classifier produced design patterns consistent with expert clinician practice. For example, subtle local rectifications were associated with a large volume reduction (i.e., a TSB-like design), whereas more substantial local rectifications (i.e., a PTB-like design) were associated with a low volume reduction.
Clinical implications: this study demonstrates how we might learn from design records to support education and enhance evidence-based socket design. The method could be used to predict design features for newly presenting patients, based on categorisations of their limb shape and other demographics, implemented alongside expert clinical judgement as smart CAD/CAM design templates.
CAD/CAM, PTB, TSB, expert system, knowledge-based system, machine learning, prosthetic limb design
Dickinson, A.S.
10151972-c1b5-4f7d-bc12-6482b5870cad
Steer, J.W.
b958f526-9782-4e36-9c49-ad48e8f650ed
Rossides, C.
0a9d478d-4417-4841-83f5-d059172b3f9d
Diment, L.E.
ae7297b9-3a62-4e7c-a52d-49aba51b7608
Mbithi, F.M.
6bf4f420-1a97-4096-b73b-6ffc02b76a21
Bramley, J.L.
102c61c2-fb86-4efb-ae98-053d46207f53
Hannett, D.
9ddbc3ae-6284-41e3-9f97-0df822217441
Blinova, J.
787d6594-8d0f-4965-89f5-ebdfb99be169
Tankard, Z.
d2cb7d2f-9cbf-4af5-95c9-f315baf3a959
Worsley, P.R.
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756
12 July 2024
Dickinson, A.S.
10151972-c1b5-4f7d-bc12-6482b5870cad
Steer, J.W.
b958f526-9782-4e36-9c49-ad48e8f650ed
Rossides, C.
0a9d478d-4417-4841-83f5-d059172b3f9d
Diment, L.E.
ae7297b9-3a62-4e7c-a52d-49aba51b7608
Mbithi, F.M.
6bf4f420-1a97-4096-b73b-6ffc02b76a21
Bramley, J.L.
102c61c2-fb86-4efb-ae98-053d46207f53
Hannett, D.
9ddbc3ae-6284-41e3-9f97-0df822217441
Blinova, J.
787d6594-8d0f-4965-89f5-ebdfb99be169
Tankard, Z.
d2cb7d2f-9cbf-4af5-95c9-f315baf3a959
Worsley, P.R.
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756
Dickinson, A.S., Steer, J.W., Rossides, C., Diment, L.E., Mbithi, F.M., Bramley, J.L., Hannett, D., Blinova, J., Tankard, Z. and Worsley, P.R.
(2024)
Insights into the spectrum of transtibial prosthetic socket design from expert clinicians and their digital records.
Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, 5, [1354069].
(doi:10.3389/fresc.2024.1354069).
Abstract
Background: transtibial prosthetic sockets are often grouped into patella tendon bearing (PTB) or total surface bearing (TSB) designs, but many variations in rectifications are used to apply these principles to an individual's personalised socket. Prosthetists currently have little objective evidence to assist them as they make design choices.
Aims: to compare rectifications made by experienced prosthetists across a range of patient demographics and limb shapes to improve understanding of socket design strategies.
Methodology: 163 residual limb surface scans and corresponding CAD/CAM sockets were analysed for 134 randomly selected individuals in a UK prosthetics service. This included 142 PTB and 21 TSB designs. The limb and socket scans were compared to determine the location and size of rectifications. Rectifications were compiled for PTB and TSB designs, and associations between different rectification sizes were assessed using a variety of methods including linear regression, kernel density estimation (KDE) and a Naïve Bayes (NB) classification.
Results: differences in design features were apparent between PTB and TSB sockets, notably for paratibial carves, gross volume reduction and distal end elongation. However, socket designs varied across a spectrum, with most showing a hybrid of the PTB and TSB principles. Pairwise correlations were observed between the size of some rectifications (e.g., paratibial carves; fibular head build and gross volume reduction). Conversely, the patellar tendon carve depth was not associated significantly with any other rectification, indicating its relative design insensitivity. The Naïve Bayes classifier produced design patterns consistent with expert clinician practice. For example, subtle local rectifications were associated with a large volume reduction (i.e., a TSB-like design), whereas more substantial local rectifications (i.e., a PTB-like design) were associated with a low volume reduction.
Clinical implications: this study demonstrates how we might learn from design records to support education and enhance evidence-based socket design. The method could be used to predict design features for newly presenting patients, based on categorisations of their limb shape and other demographics, implemented alongside expert clinical judgement as smart CAD/CAM design templates.
Other
1354069_Manuscript (1)
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
fresc-05-1354069
- Version of Record
More information
Submitted date: 11 December 2023
Accepted/In Press date: 25 April 2024
Published date: 12 July 2024
Keywords:
CAD/CAM, PTB, TSB, expert system, knowledge-based system, machine learning, prosthetic limb design
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 494458
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/494458
ISSN: 2673-6861
PURE UUID: 8b87afb5-e8a2-4e6f-8ad0-84abd2dec3fb
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 08 Oct 2024 16:53
Last modified: 12 Nov 2024 03:08
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
C. Rossides
Author:
L.E. Diment
Author:
J.L. Bramley
Author:
D. Hannett
Author:
J. Blinova
Author:
Z. Tankard
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics