Surface dyslexia without dysgraphia: a case report of a new dissociation
Surface dyslexia without dysgraphia: a case report of a new dissociation
There is considerable debate on the extent to which reading and spelling rely on shared versus distinct cognitive processes (Tainturier & Rapp, 2001). Studies of brain-damaged individuals with impaired access to orthography have supported both views. Of particular interest are cases of "surface dyslexia," a disorder characterised by a dissociation between impaired reading of irregular words and relatively preserved reading of regular words and nonwords. Most errors are regularisations (e.g., CHEF--> "tchef"). Surface dyslexia is believed to result from a deficit at the level of the orthographic lexicon, a memory store of the spelling of familiar words. The accurate reading of regular words and nonwords is thought to reflect the use of a spared non-lexical route to reading. Attempting to read irregular words through this route will result in regularisation errors because the sublexical process maps graphemes to their most common pronunciation (i.e., CH pronounced "tch" rather than "sh"). Advocates of shared orthographic lexicons (e.g., Behrmann & Bub, 1992) have stressed the fact that patients with surface dyslexia usually also suffer from "surface dysgraphia," a disorder affecting words with ambiguous/irregular spellings and manifesting itself by the production of phonologically plausible errors such as "knowledge" --> NOLIGE. However, advocates of distinct reading/spelling lexicons (e.g., Caramazza, 1988) have pointed out that some patients have surface dysgraphia without surface dyslexia. This might suggest impaired access to an orthographic output lexicon used in spelling with preserved access to an orthographic input lexicon used in reading and written word recognition. We report the first case of a patient who presents with the opposite dissociation, that is, prototypical surface dyslexia with entirely preserved spelling. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
197-199
Tainturier, Marie Josèphe
1084aaa3-62a3-4387-a61d-78a3addd9eec
Valdois, Sylviane
b167ec4f-e43f-42ec-86b0-458202c1a0b5
David, JD
b92e19d2-7f73-4834-a0f4-392150435c60
Leek, Elwyn
6f63c405-e28f-4f8c-8ead-3b0a79c7dc88
2002
Tainturier, Marie Josèphe
1084aaa3-62a3-4387-a61d-78a3addd9eec
Valdois, Sylviane
b167ec4f-e43f-42ec-86b0-458202c1a0b5
David, JD
b92e19d2-7f73-4834-a0f4-392150435c60
Leek, Elwyn
6f63c405-e28f-4f8c-8ead-3b0a79c7dc88
Tainturier, Marie Josèphe, Valdois, Sylviane, David, JD and Leek, Elwyn
(2002)
Surface dyslexia without dysgraphia: a case report of a new dissociation.
Brain and Language, 83 (1), .
(doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00059-7).
Abstract
There is considerable debate on the extent to which reading and spelling rely on shared versus distinct cognitive processes (Tainturier & Rapp, 2001). Studies of brain-damaged individuals with impaired access to orthography have supported both views. Of particular interest are cases of "surface dyslexia," a disorder characterised by a dissociation between impaired reading of irregular words and relatively preserved reading of regular words and nonwords. Most errors are regularisations (e.g., CHEF--> "tchef"). Surface dyslexia is believed to result from a deficit at the level of the orthographic lexicon, a memory store of the spelling of familiar words. The accurate reading of regular words and nonwords is thought to reflect the use of a spared non-lexical route to reading. Attempting to read irregular words through this route will result in regularisation errors because the sublexical process maps graphemes to their most common pronunciation (i.e., CH pronounced "tch" rather than "sh"). Advocates of shared orthographic lexicons (e.g., Behrmann & Bub, 1992) have stressed the fact that patients with surface dyslexia usually also suffer from "surface dysgraphia," a disorder affecting words with ambiguous/irregular spellings and manifesting itself by the production of phonologically plausible errors such as "knowledge" --> NOLIGE. However, advocates of distinct reading/spelling lexicons (e.g., Caramazza, 1988) have pointed out that some patients have surface dysgraphia without surface dyslexia. This might suggest impaired access to an orthographic output lexicon used in spelling with preserved access to an orthographic input lexicon used in reading and written word recognition. We report the first case of a patient who presents with the opposite dissociation, that is, prototypical surface dyslexia with entirely preserved spelling. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2002
Venue - Dates:
40th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Aphasia, , New York, United States, 2002-10-20 - 2002-10-22
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 494499
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/494499
PURE UUID: 2558212d-ff88-4c3f-b225-96d0e68d06a6
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Oct 2024 16:58
Last modified: 10 Oct 2024 02:09
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Marie Josèphe Tainturier
Author:
Sylviane Valdois
Author:
JD David
Author:
Elwyn Leek
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics