The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Success factors of business intelligence and dashboards to improve performance in higher education

Success factors of business intelligence and dashboards to improve performance in higher education
Success factors of business intelligence and dashboards to improve performance in higher education
Information overload is a recognised phenomenon related to the continuous increase of data that need to be dealt with. This overload can be managed using dashboards (DB), which are considered some of the most useful tools in business intelligence (BI), merging concepts such as scorecards to assist stakeholders and employees to improve performance and make the appropriate decisions. However, many software vendors do not draw the necessary level of attention to the effectiveness and usefulness of DB; instead, they promote the ability to visualise as much data as possible for marketing purposes, and they focus on display features and visualisation mechanisms. Also, there is a limited number of studies that investigate the use of BI and DB in higher education (HE) to improve decision-making and enhance performance. Having a better understanding of these technologies in the HE context boosts our comprehension of critical factors and measures, and helps us to visualise them appropriately, which in turn improves performance. For this complex and multidimensional research area, triangulation is applied using qualitative and quantitative approaches to gather insights, modify the presented factors, or identify new ones to construct the framework. In more detail, the literature review is used to build a holistic understanding of the proposed framework of the success factors. After that, a qualitative approach is adopted to investigate and validate the framework. Then, the final version of the framework is presented after applying quantitative methodology with an alternative group of participants to confirm the final version of the framework. The case study approach is used to evaluate and introduce a list of metrics to measure the factors presented in the framework. The measures of these factors are evaluated and constructed by applying goal question metrics (GQM) within three case studies.
In terms of results, it is clear that almost all the proposed factors are important and belong to the proposed perspectives, highlighting the use of balanced scorecards (BSC) in measuring the success factors of BI and DB. In light of this, a framework for successfully using BI and DB is constructed by
triangulating the literature review, expert reviews, and questionnaires. In addition, the instrument that includes metrics for the success factors framework is introduced.
University of Southampton
Abduldaem, Asmaa Mohammed M
496e06c2-b05b-4833-b987-db20f5fee912
Abduldaem, Asmaa Mohammed M
496e06c2-b05b-4833-b987-db20f5fee912
Gravell, Andrew M
f3a261c5-f057-4b5f-b6ac-c1ca37d72749
Howard, Yvonne
8aecbf0f-ed6a-4ce6-9530-5fa43226a3b0

Abduldaem, Asmaa Mohammed M (2024) Success factors of business intelligence and dashboards to improve performance in higher education. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 229pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Information overload is a recognised phenomenon related to the continuous increase of data that need to be dealt with. This overload can be managed using dashboards (DB), which are considered some of the most useful tools in business intelligence (BI), merging concepts such as scorecards to assist stakeholders and employees to improve performance and make the appropriate decisions. However, many software vendors do not draw the necessary level of attention to the effectiveness and usefulness of DB; instead, they promote the ability to visualise as much data as possible for marketing purposes, and they focus on display features and visualisation mechanisms. Also, there is a limited number of studies that investigate the use of BI and DB in higher education (HE) to improve decision-making and enhance performance. Having a better understanding of these technologies in the HE context boosts our comprehension of critical factors and measures, and helps us to visualise them appropriately, which in turn improves performance. For this complex and multidimensional research area, triangulation is applied using qualitative and quantitative approaches to gather insights, modify the presented factors, or identify new ones to construct the framework. In more detail, the literature review is used to build a holistic understanding of the proposed framework of the success factors. After that, a qualitative approach is adopted to investigate and validate the framework. Then, the final version of the framework is presented after applying quantitative methodology with an alternative group of participants to confirm the final version of the framework. The case study approach is used to evaluate and introduce a list of metrics to measure the factors presented in the framework. The measures of these factors are evaluated and constructed by applying goal question metrics (GQM) within three case studies.
In terms of results, it is clear that almost all the proposed factors are important and belong to the proposed perspectives, highlighting the use of balanced scorecards (BSC) in measuring the success factors of BI and DB. In light of this, a framework for successfully using BI and DB is constructed by
triangulating the literature review, expert reviews, and questionnaires. In addition, the instrument that includes metrics for the success factors framework is introduced.

Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Mrs-Asmaa-Abduldaem - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (3MB)
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Mrs-Asmaa-Abduldaem (1)
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: October 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 494511
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/494511
PURE UUID: d80febbe-4c09-4b28-aa6e-b6a881569a4d

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Oct 2024 16:30
Last modified: 10 Oct 2024 16:30

Export record

Contributors

Author: Asmaa Mohammed M Abduldaem
Thesis advisor: Andrew M Gravell
Thesis advisor: Yvonne Howard

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×