Legislating for a pandemic: exposing the stateless state
Legislating for a pandemic: exposing the stateless state
Initially the subject of widespread consensus, legislative and policy responses to COVID-19 are increasingly provoking predictable reactions. Right and left are united by concern that essential freedoms are being eroded by a state utilizing the opportunity of the pandemic to make a power grab. Focused on the Coronavirus Act 2020, this article takes a more cautious approach, suggesting that the law should be understood not as the product of a hierarchical state but as a demonstration of the ‘statelessness’ of the contemporary state. It examines the Act with particular focus on open justice, adult social care, and Business Improvement Districts. Reading this unique piece of legislation through the lens of the stateless state reveals the complexities, ambiguities, and contestations within contemporary policy making. Dismissing the Act as unnecessarily authoritarian is an insufficiently nuanced response; furthermore, this exploration of the law allows us to develop and complicate scholarship on the stateless state.
Coronavirus Act 2020, Stateless State
S302-S320
Kirton-Darling, Edward
7eb553fa-6279-49d2-a8ed-bd02d4e0704d
Carr, Helen
ba58458b-b81c-420e-8219-a5ae03776642
Varnava, Tracey
e6937252-4993-4adf-b721-0c4456db7167
23 November 2020
Kirton-Darling, Edward
7eb553fa-6279-49d2-a8ed-bd02d4e0704d
Carr, Helen
ba58458b-b81c-420e-8219-a5ae03776642
Varnava, Tracey
e6937252-4993-4adf-b721-0c4456db7167
Kirton-Darling, Edward, Carr, Helen and Varnava, Tracey
(2020)
Legislating for a pandemic: exposing the stateless state.
Journal of Law and Society, 47 (S2), , [7].
(doi:10.1111/jols.12271).
Abstract
Initially the subject of widespread consensus, legislative and policy responses to COVID-19 are increasingly provoking predictable reactions. Right and left are united by concern that essential freedoms are being eroded by a state utilizing the opportunity of the pandemic to make a power grab. Focused on the Coronavirus Act 2020, this article takes a more cautious approach, suggesting that the law should be understood not as the product of a hierarchical state but as a demonstration of the ‘statelessness’ of the contemporary state. It examines the Act with particular focus on open justice, adult social care, and Business Improvement Districts. Reading this unique piece of legislation through the lens of the stateless state reveals the complexities, ambiguities, and contestations within contemporary policy making. Dismissing the Act as unnecessarily authoritarian is an insufficiently nuanced response; furthermore, this exploration of the law allows us to develop and complicate scholarship on the stateless state.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 23 November 2020
Keywords:
Coronavirus Act 2020, Stateless State
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 494513
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/494513
ISSN: 1467-6478
PURE UUID: 0ca876d3-9650-4144-a718-071a56d39c62
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 Oct 2024 16:30
Last modified: 11 Oct 2024 02:05
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Edward Kirton-Darling
Author:
Tracey Varnava
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics