The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Modeling evasive response bias in randomized response: cheater detection versus self-protective no-saying

Modeling evasive response bias in randomized response: cheater detection versus self-protective no-saying
Modeling evasive response bias in randomized response: cheater detection versus self-protective no-saying

Randomized response is an interview technique for sensitive questions designed to eliminate evasive response bias. Since this elimination is only partially successful, two models have been proposed for modeling evasive response bias: the cheater detection model for a design with two sub-samples with different randomization probabilities and the self-protective no sayers model for a design with multiple sensitive questions. This paper shows the correspondence between these models, and introduces models for the new, hybrid “ever/last year” design that account for self-protective no saying and cheating. The model for one set of ever/last year questions has a degree of freedom that can be used for the inclusion of a response bias parameter. Models with multiple degrees of freedom are introduced for extensions of the design with a third randomized response question and a second set of ever/last year questions. The models are illustrated with two surveys on doping use. We conclude with a discussion of the pros and cons of the ever/last year design and its potential for future research.

anabolics, doping, ever/last year, sensitive questions
0033-3123
1261-1279
Sayed, Khadiga H.A.
9f0ba98e-f5a6-41c1-8e29-9ef779803ff9
Cruyff, Maarten J.L.F.
7efbafcd-7831-48b4-bbea-9d95709b1235
Van Der Heijden, Peter G.M.
85157917-3b33-4683-81be-713f987fd612
Sayed, Khadiga H.A.
9f0ba98e-f5a6-41c1-8e29-9ef779803ff9
Cruyff, Maarten J.L.F.
7efbafcd-7831-48b4-bbea-9d95709b1235
Van Der Heijden, Peter G.M.
85157917-3b33-4683-81be-713f987fd612

Sayed, Khadiga H.A., Cruyff, Maarten J.L.F. and Van Der Heijden, Peter G.M. (2024) Modeling evasive response bias in randomized response: cheater detection versus self-protective no-saying. Psychometrika, 89 (4), 1261-1279. (doi:10.1007/s11336-024-10000-x).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Randomized response is an interview technique for sensitive questions designed to eliminate evasive response bias. Since this elimination is only partially successful, two models have been proposed for modeling evasive response bias: the cheater detection model for a design with two sub-samples with different randomization probabilities and the self-protective no sayers model for a design with multiple sensitive questions. This paper shows the correspondence between these models, and introduces models for the new, hybrid “ever/last year” design that account for self-protective no saying and cheating. The model for one set of ever/last year questions has a degree of freedom that can be used for the inclusion of a response bias parameter. Models with multiple degrees of freedom are introduced for extensions of the design with a third randomized response question and a second set of ever/last year questions. The models are illustrated with two surveys on doping use. We conclude with a discussion of the pros and cons of the ever/last year design and its potential for future research.

Text
s11336-024-10000-x - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (482kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 16 August 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 30 August 2024
Keywords: anabolics, doping, ever/last year, sensitive questions

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 494586
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/494586
ISSN: 0033-3123
PURE UUID: 773b25a7-2b88-4d04-8bda-a0604b00a9f9
ORCID for Peter G.M. Van Der Heijden: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3345-096X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Oct 2024 16:53
Last modified: 30 Nov 2024 02:48

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Khadiga H.A. Sayed
Author: Maarten J.L.F. Cruyff

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×