Disagreement on the North Atlantic Cold Blob Formation Mechanisms among Climate Models
Disagreement on the North Atlantic Cold Blob Formation Mechanisms among Climate Models
Despite global warming, the sea surface temperature (SST) in the subpolar North Atlantic has decreased since the 1900s. This local cooling, known as the North Atlantic cold blob, signifies a unique role of the subpolar North Atlantic in uptaking heat and hence impacts downstream weather and climate. However, a lack of observational records and their constraints on climate models leave the North Atlantic cold blob formation mechanism inconclusive. Using simulations from phase 6 of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, we assess the primary processes driving the North Atlantic cold blob within individual models and whether the mechanisms are consistent across models. We show that 11 out of 32 models, which we call “Cold Blob” models, simulate the subpolar North Atlantic cooling over 1900–2014. Further analyzing the heat budget of the subpolar North Atlantic SST shows that models have distinct mechanisms of cold blob formation. While 4 of the 11 Cold Blob models indicate decreased oceanic heat transport convergence (OHTC) as the key mechanism, another four models suggest changes in radiative processes making predominant contributions. The contribution of OHTC and radiative processes is comparable in the remaining three models. Such a model disagreement on the mechanism of cold blob formation may be associated with simulated base-state Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) strength, which explains 39% of the intermodel spread in the contribution of OHTC to the simulated cold blob. Models with a stronger base-state AMOC suggest a greater role of OHTC, whereas those with a weaker base-state AMOC indicate that radiative processes are more responsible. This model discrepancy suggests that the cold blob formation mechanism diagnosed from single model should be interpreted with caution.
4061-4078
Fan, Yifei
bbeddddc-7963-484e-afa1-7b6e72e1da02
Chan, Duo
4c1278dc-7f39-4b67-b1cd-3f81f55f4906
Zhang, Pengfei
7949864f-9334-4c1a-b6e6-a0185b531029
Li, Laifang
7ef502f2-3319-4290-90e4-a50c76dc55f3
Fan, Yifei
bbeddddc-7963-484e-afa1-7b6e72e1da02
Chan, Duo
4c1278dc-7f39-4b67-b1cd-3f81f55f4906
Zhang, Pengfei
7949864f-9334-4c1a-b6e6-a0185b531029
Li, Laifang
7ef502f2-3319-4290-90e4-a50c76dc55f3
Fan, Yifei, Chan, Duo, Zhang, Pengfei and Li, Laifang
(2024)
Disagreement on the North Atlantic Cold Blob Formation Mechanisms among Climate Models.
Journal of Climate, 37 (16), .
(doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0654.1).
Abstract
Despite global warming, the sea surface temperature (SST) in the subpolar North Atlantic has decreased since the 1900s. This local cooling, known as the North Atlantic cold blob, signifies a unique role of the subpolar North Atlantic in uptaking heat and hence impacts downstream weather and climate. However, a lack of observational records and their constraints on climate models leave the North Atlantic cold blob formation mechanism inconclusive. Using simulations from phase 6 of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, we assess the primary processes driving the North Atlantic cold blob within individual models and whether the mechanisms are consistent across models. We show that 11 out of 32 models, which we call “Cold Blob” models, simulate the subpolar North Atlantic cooling over 1900–2014. Further analyzing the heat budget of the subpolar North Atlantic SST shows that models have distinct mechanisms of cold blob formation. While 4 of the 11 Cold Blob models indicate decreased oceanic heat transport convergence (OHTC) as the key mechanism, another four models suggest changes in radiative processes making predominant contributions. The contribution of OHTC and radiative processes is comparable in the remaining three models. Such a model disagreement on the mechanism of cold blob formation may be associated with simulated base-state Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) strength, which explains 39% of the intermodel spread in the contribution of OHTC to the simulated cold blob. Models with a stronger base-state AMOC suggest a greater role of OHTC, whereas those with a weaker base-state AMOC indicate that radiative processes are more responsible. This model discrepancy suggests that the cold blob formation mechanism diagnosed from single model should be interpreted with caution.
Text
JC CMIP6 Disagreement NACB 0301
- Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 29 January 2025.
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 10 April 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 29 July 2024
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 494682
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/494682
ISSN: 0894-8755
PURE UUID: 6dde8142-44c3-49b2-942c-fa487f1e9c9e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 14 Oct 2024 16:35
Last modified: 15 Oct 2024 02:08
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Yifei Fan
Author:
Duo Chan
Author:
Pengfei Zhang
Author:
Laifang Li
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics