Management of asthma in primary care in the changing context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative longitudinal study with patients
Management of asthma in primary care in the changing context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative longitudinal study with patients
Background: the COVID-19 pandemic dramatically affected asthma monitoring in primary care. Yet patients’ views and experiences of managing their asthma and seeking help from primary care during the pandemic have not been explored.
Aim: to investigate patients’ experiences of asthma management in the community during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design and setting: A qualitative longitudinal study using semi-structured interviews with asthma patients usually managed in primary care.
Method: interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed using inductive temporal thematic analysis and trajectory approach.
Results: forty-six interviews were conducted with 18 asthma patients over eight months that covered contrasting stages of the pandemic. Patients felt less vulnerable as the pandemic subsided but the process of making sense of risk was dynamic and influenced by multiple factors. Patients relied on self-management strategies but felt that routine asthma reviews should still have been conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic and highlighted limited opportunities to discuss their asthma with health care professionals. Patients with well controlled symptoms felt that remote reviews were largely satisfactory but still felt that face to face reviews were necessary for certain aspects such as physical examination and patient-led discussion of sensitive or broader issues associated with asthma including mental health.
Conclusions: the dynamic nature of patients’ perception of risk throughout the pandemic highlighted the need for a greater clarity regarding patients’ personal risk. Having opportunity to discuss their asthma is important to patients even during periods when access to face to face consultations in primary care is more restricted than usual.
Asthma, longitudinal interviews, primary care, qualitative
Santillo, Marta
ea247305-2516-4c12-9c07-bf33cf659038
Tonkin-Crine, Sarah
65679835-9bdc-48b6-92f3-cc6322cccc4f
Wang, Kay
35ab64db-e4d5-4b4b-9225-54c9bcc6d143
Butler, Christopher
8bf4cace-c34a-4b65-838f-29c2be91e434
Wanat, Marta
06bd38ef-2f81-4a13-ab42-ad43c404e85d
Santillo, Marta
ea247305-2516-4c12-9c07-bf33cf659038
Tonkin-Crine, Sarah
65679835-9bdc-48b6-92f3-cc6322cccc4f
Wang, Kay
35ab64db-e4d5-4b4b-9225-54c9bcc6d143
Butler, Christopher
8bf4cace-c34a-4b65-838f-29c2be91e434
Wanat, Marta
06bd38ef-2f81-4a13-ab42-ad43c404e85d
Santillo, Marta, Tonkin-Crine, Sarah, Wang, Kay, Butler, Christopher and Wanat, Marta
(2023)
Management of asthma in primary care in the changing context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative longitudinal study with patients.
British Journal of General Practice, 73.
(doi:10.3399/BJGP.2022.0581).
Abstract
Background: the COVID-19 pandemic dramatically affected asthma monitoring in primary care. Yet patients’ views and experiences of managing their asthma and seeking help from primary care during the pandemic have not been explored.
Aim: to investigate patients’ experiences of asthma management in the community during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design and setting: A qualitative longitudinal study using semi-structured interviews with asthma patients usually managed in primary care.
Method: interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed using inductive temporal thematic analysis and trajectory approach.
Results: forty-six interviews were conducted with 18 asthma patients over eight months that covered contrasting stages of the pandemic. Patients felt less vulnerable as the pandemic subsided but the process of making sense of risk was dynamic and influenced by multiple factors. Patients relied on self-management strategies but felt that routine asthma reviews should still have been conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic and highlighted limited opportunities to discuss their asthma with health care professionals. Patients with well controlled symptoms felt that remote reviews were largely satisfactory but still felt that face to face reviews were necessary for certain aspects such as physical examination and patient-led discussion of sensitive or broader issues associated with asthma including mental health.
Conclusions: the dynamic nature of patients’ perception of risk throughout the pandemic highlighted the need for a greater clarity regarding patients’ personal risk. Having opportunity to discuss their asthma is important to patients even during periods when access to face to face consultations in primary care is more restricted than usual.
Text
Management_of_asthma_in_primary_care_in_the_changing_context_of_the_COVID-19_pandemic_a_qualitative_longitudinal_study_with_patients (1)
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
e903.full
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 4 April 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 30 November 2023
Keywords:
Asthma, longitudinal interviews, primary care, qualitative
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 494728
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/494728
ISSN: 0960-1643
PURE UUID: 9f05a698-0990-45f5-be96-664a71897176
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 14 Oct 2024 17:04
Last modified: 14 Oct 2024 17:05
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Marta Santillo
Author:
Sarah Tonkin-Crine
Author:
Kay Wang
Author:
Christopher Butler
Author:
Marta Wanat
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics