Pressure distribution at the device skin interface of a cervical collar: finite element and physical modelling
Pressure distribution at the device skin interface of a cervical collar: finite element and physical modelling
Introduction
Cervical collars form part of the standard immobilization procedures for patients with a suspected cervical spine injury. However, several issues with their use have been identified [1], including the risk of pressure ulcers from prolonged mechanical loads at the device-skin interface. Interface pressure is the standard for evaluating the mechanical conditions between devices and the skin. However, it is difficult to get a complete evaluation of interface pressure from in vivo studies. Measurement systems are mostly limited to discrete points or small regions of interest. To get a better understanding of the pressure ulcer risk, it is important to evaluate the distribution of pressure across the whole interface and to evaluate the internal stress and strain values in the skin and sub-dermal tissues. Several studies have successfully used finite element modelling to evaluate the device skin interactions [2]. However, to date cervical collars have not been thoroughly investigated. This study aimed to model a generic cervical collar design over an area of skin at risk of ulceration using a finite element model. The predicted mechanical conditions at the device interface were corroborated with physical model bench testing.
Methods
A physical model measured tension in the lateral straps and interface pressure at points across the collar back panel (Figure 1). The physical model consisted of a composite shell with a silicone skin layer matching the shape of a medium NIOSH head. The finite element model consisted of the back of a generic collar modelled as an 8 mm thick oval with second-order hexahedral elements (E = 0.5 MPa, ν = 0.4) (FEBio, USA). The head was modelled from surface scans of the physical model as a rigid surface. Displacements applied to the sides of the collar represented the applied strap tension.
Results
Table 1 compares the strap tension and interface pressures between the physical and finite element models.
Figure 2 shows the pressure distribution of the generic collar model. Areas of high pressure were present at the occiput and over the shoulders.
Discussion
The finite element model corroborated with expected maximum interface pressures at a normal loading tension, measured with the physical model. Areas of high pressure observed in the finite element model match those identified as high risk in the literature [3], corresponding to the occiput. By using a combination of physical and finite element modelling a better understanding of the biomechanics at the device skin interface can be established. This work has demonstrated that pressure distribution can be evaluated for a generic collar design. Future work will develop finite element models specific to popular collar designs. In addition, population-based variations of head and neck shape will be included in parametric studies of collar design.
References
1. Brannigan et al, Global Spine Journal, 12:1968-1978, 2022.
2. Bader et al, BioMed Eng OnLine, 17:40, 2018.
3. Ham et al, Injury, 47:1924-1931, 2016.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) grant EP/S02249X/1 for the Centre for Doctoral Training in Prosthetics and Orthotics
Russell, Laurence Jeppe
060b13e9-9203-4f98-b7ad-f77ef2e08f35
Jiang, Liudi
374f2414-51f0-418f-a316-e7db0d6dc4d1
Filingeri, Davide
42502a34-e7e6-4b49-b304-ce2ae0bf7b24
Worsley, Pete
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756
9 September 2023
Russell, Laurence Jeppe
060b13e9-9203-4f98-b7ad-f77ef2e08f35
Jiang, Liudi
374f2414-51f0-418f-a316-e7db0d6dc4d1
Filingeri, Davide
42502a34-e7e6-4b49-b304-ce2ae0bf7b24
Worsley, Pete
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756
Russell, Laurence Jeppe, Jiang, Liudi, Filingeri, Davide and Worsley, Pete
(2023)
Pressure distribution at the device skin interface of a cervical collar: finite element and physical modelling.
28th Congress of the European Society of Biomechanics, MECC, Maasricht, Netherlands.
09 - 12 Jul 2023.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Poster)
Abstract
Introduction
Cervical collars form part of the standard immobilization procedures for patients with a suspected cervical spine injury. However, several issues with their use have been identified [1], including the risk of pressure ulcers from prolonged mechanical loads at the device-skin interface. Interface pressure is the standard for evaluating the mechanical conditions between devices and the skin. However, it is difficult to get a complete evaluation of interface pressure from in vivo studies. Measurement systems are mostly limited to discrete points or small regions of interest. To get a better understanding of the pressure ulcer risk, it is important to evaluate the distribution of pressure across the whole interface and to evaluate the internal stress and strain values in the skin and sub-dermal tissues. Several studies have successfully used finite element modelling to evaluate the device skin interactions [2]. However, to date cervical collars have not been thoroughly investigated. This study aimed to model a generic cervical collar design over an area of skin at risk of ulceration using a finite element model. The predicted mechanical conditions at the device interface were corroborated with physical model bench testing.
Methods
A physical model measured tension in the lateral straps and interface pressure at points across the collar back panel (Figure 1). The physical model consisted of a composite shell with a silicone skin layer matching the shape of a medium NIOSH head. The finite element model consisted of the back of a generic collar modelled as an 8 mm thick oval with second-order hexahedral elements (E = 0.5 MPa, ν = 0.4) (FEBio, USA). The head was modelled from surface scans of the physical model as a rigid surface. Displacements applied to the sides of the collar represented the applied strap tension.
Results
Table 1 compares the strap tension and interface pressures between the physical and finite element models.
Figure 2 shows the pressure distribution of the generic collar model. Areas of high pressure were present at the occiput and over the shoulders.
Discussion
The finite element model corroborated with expected maximum interface pressures at a normal loading tension, measured with the physical model. Areas of high pressure observed in the finite element model match those identified as high risk in the literature [3], corresponding to the occiput. By using a combination of physical and finite element modelling a better understanding of the biomechanics at the device skin interface can be established. This work has demonstrated that pressure distribution can be evaluated for a generic collar design. Future work will develop finite element models specific to popular collar designs. In addition, population-based variations of head and neck shape will be included in parametric studies of collar design.
References
1. Brannigan et al, Global Spine Journal, 12:1968-1978, 2022.
2. Bader et al, BioMed Eng OnLine, 17:40, 2018.
3. Ham et al, Injury, 47:1924-1931, 2016.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) grant EP/S02249X/1 for the Centre for Doctoral Training in Prosthetics and Orthotics
Text
ESB2023_Abstract_Modelling_LJR
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Published date: 9 September 2023
Venue - Dates:
28th Congress of the European Society of Biomechanics, MECC, Maasricht, Netherlands, 2023-07-09 - 2023-07-12
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 494882
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/494882
PURE UUID: 3af68015-819f-46b6-8938-c15a4ddfbdc0
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 22 Oct 2024 16:33
Last modified: 23 Oct 2024 02:02
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Laurence Jeppe Russell
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics