Should we be wary of the role of scientific publishers in Open Science?
Should we be wary of the role of scientific publishers in Open Science?
We wish to express our concern for the role of for-profit scientific publishers in understanding and appropriating what “Open Science” means. This role can be characterised as opportunistic, and has led to an interpretation that can cause considerable confusion when we identify Open Science with Open Access and Open Access with "paying for publishing”. This simplistic approach to what Open Science entails has led to poor quality publications, hindering the improvement of researchers' practices and culture. We discuss and clarify issues, identifying “false friends”, misunderstandings and misleading interpretations of Open Science. A superficial interpretation, sometimes driven by vested interests or simply due to the proliferation of bad practices, leads to unethical behaviour or simply opportunism, in the ‘publish and perish’ context where Open Science has developed. We then provide guidance on challenges and potential solutions for all stakeholders to increase rigour and credibility in science, through a genuine researcher perspective of Open Science.
Open science, publishers
Maniadis, Zacharias
70ffa309-94c9-487c-982f-778294ea2a13
Mendez, Eva
02c08730-f154-4351-8ef8-6f667a8d96c5
Sánchez-Núñez, Pablo
009117ac-a87b-4878-b786-789c54719b5c
Fillon, Adrien
229325c8-ed39-40c1-8286-d32f1a1a8007
Maniadis, Zacharias
70ffa309-94c9-487c-982f-778294ea2a13
Mendez, Eva
02c08730-f154-4351-8ef8-6f667a8d96c5
Sánchez-Núñez, Pablo
009117ac-a87b-4878-b786-789c54719b5c
Fillon, Adrien
229325c8-ed39-40c1-8286-d32f1a1a8007
Maniadis, Zacharias, Mendez, Eva, Sánchez-Núñez, Pablo and Fillon, Adrien
(2024)
Should we be wary of the role of scientific publishers in Open Science?
Abstract
We wish to express our concern for the role of for-profit scientific publishers in understanding and appropriating what “Open Science” means. This role can be characterised as opportunistic, and has led to an interpretation that can cause considerable confusion when we identify Open Science with Open Access and Open Access with "paying for publishing”. This simplistic approach to what Open Science entails has led to poor quality publications, hindering the improvement of researchers' practices and culture. We discuss and clarify issues, identifying “false friends”, misunderstandings and misleading interpretations of Open Science. A superficial interpretation, sometimes driven by vested interests or simply due to the proliferation of bad practices, leads to unethical behaviour or simply opportunism, in the ‘publish and perish’ context where Open Science has developed. We then provide guidance on challenges and potential solutions for all stakeholders to increase rigour and credibility in science, through a genuine researcher perspective of Open Science.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 11 June 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 June 2024
Keywords:
Open science, publishers
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 495034
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/495034
PURE UUID: d25e2d2f-e186-48ce-b1b2-e65c475a4968
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 28 Oct 2024 17:42
Last modified: 29 Oct 2024 02:46
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Eva Mendez
Author:
Pablo Sánchez-Núñez
Author:
Adrien Fillon
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics