The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

How well can we measure chronic pain impact in existing longitudinal cohort studies? Lessons learned

How well can we measure chronic pain impact in existing longitudinal cohort studies? Lessons learned
How well can we measure chronic pain impact in existing longitudinal cohort studies? Lessons learned

Multiple large longitudinal cohorts provide opportunities to address questions about predictors of pain and pain trajectories, even when not anticipated in design of the historical databases. This focus article uses two empirical examples to illustrate the processes of assessing the measurement properties of data from large cohort studies to answer questions about pain. In both examples, data were screened to select candidate variables that captured the impact of chronic pain on self-care activities, productivity and social activities. We describe a series of steps to select candidate items and evaluate their psychometric characteristics in relation to the measurement of pain impact proposed. In UK Biobank, a general lack of internal consistency of variables selected prevented the identification of a satisfactory measurement model, with lessons for the measurement of chronic pain impact. In the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, a measurement model for chronic pain impact was identified, albeit limited to capturing the impact of pain on self-care and productivity but lacking coverage related to social participation. In conjunction with its supplementary material, this focus article aims to encourage exploration of these valuable prospectively collected data; to support researchers to make explicit the relationships between items in the databases and constructs of interest in pain research; and to use empirical methods to estimate the possible biases in these variables. PERSPECTIVE: This focus article outlines a theory-driven approach for fitting new measurement models to data from large cohort studies, and evaluating their psychometric properties. This aims to help researchers develop an empirical understanding of the gains and limitations connected with the process of re-purposing the data stored in these datasets.

1526-5900
Vitali, Diego
7f3a05cc-dded-417d-b1fb-37d15b479e7d
Woolley, Charlotte S.C.
a7489a54-bb5f-4c69-b0b2-50e0c1a3d01b
Ly, Amanda
eaa29c9c-34b2-493b-b508-e308fb4e848d
Nunes, Matthew
925d2e9f-8185-4479-aaf4-55fa45b83e1f
Lisboa, Laura Oporto
b6ad5b38-c7e7-4c20-b03f-754628d2bda6
Keogh, Edmund
c59c78dd-bfa2-4aa5-8fd8-d83550c5f378
McBeth, John
98012716-66ba-480b-9e43-ac53b51dce61
Ehrhardt, Beate
e668bb6c-99ca-43cf-857f-f5298a6cc930
Williams, Amanda C. de C.
fd19495c-9b4c-4598-8af3-71ac33159403
Eccleston, Christopher
5af6a4a9-c83b-43ba-800d-e30e9be2d1a2
Vitali, Diego
7f3a05cc-dded-417d-b1fb-37d15b479e7d
Woolley, Charlotte S.C.
a7489a54-bb5f-4c69-b0b2-50e0c1a3d01b
Ly, Amanda
eaa29c9c-34b2-493b-b508-e308fb4e848d
Nunes, Matthew
925d2e9f-8185-4479-aaf4-55fa45b83e1f
Lisboa, Laura Oporto
b6ad5b38-c7e7-4c20-b03f-754628d2bda6
Keogh, Edmund
c59c78dd-bfa2-4aa5-8fd8-d83550c5f378
McBeth, John
98012716-66ba-480b-9e43-ac53b51dce61
Ehrhardt, Beate
e668bb6c-99ca-43cf-857f-f5298a6cc930
Williams, Amanda C. de C.
fd19495c-9b4c-4598-8af3-71ac33159403
Eccleston, Christopher
5af6a4a9-c83b-43ba-800d-e30e9be2d1a2

Vitali, Diego, Woolley, Charlotte S.C., Ly, Amanda, Nunes, Matthew, Lisboa, Laura Oporto, Keogh, Edmund, McBeth, John, Ehrhardt, Beate, Williams, Amanda C. de C. and Eccleston, Christopher (2024) How well can we measure chronic pain impact in existing longitudinal cohort studies? Lessons learned. Journal of Pain. (doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104679).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Multiple large longitudinal cohorts provide opportunities to address questions about predictors of pain and pain trajectories, even when not anticipated in design of the historical databases. This focus article uses two empirical examples to illustrate the processes of assessing the measurement properties of data from large cohort studies to answer questions about pain. In both examples, data were screened to select candidate variables that captured the impact of chronic pain on self-care activities, productivity and social activities. We describe a series of steps to select candidate items and evaluate their psychometric characteristics in relation to the measurement of pain impact proposed. In UK Biobank, a general lack of internal consistency of variables selected prevented the identification of a satisfactory measurement model, with lessons for the measurement of chronic pain impact. In the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, a measurement model for chronic pain impact was identified, albeit limited to capturing the impact of pain on self-care and productivity but lacking coverage related to social participation. In conjunction with its supplementary material, this focus article aims to encourage exploration of these valuable prospectively collected data; to support researchers to make explicit the relationships between items in the databases and constructs of interest in pain research; and to use empirical methods to estimate the possible biases in these variables. PERSPECTIVE: This focus article outlines a theory-driven approach for fitting new measurement models to data from large cohort studies, and evaluating their psychometric properties. This aims to help researchers develop an empirical understanding of the gains and limitations connected with the process of re-purposing the data stored in these datasets.

Text
PIIS1526590024006412 - Proof
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (894kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 10 September 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 16 September 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 495036
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/495036
ISSN: 1526-5900
PURE UUID: e85f5df3-9565-4de0-b203-f216f7812508
ORCID for John McBeth: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7047-2183

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 Oct 2024 17:44
Last modified: 29 Oct 2024 03:11

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Diego Vitali
Author: Charlotte S.C. Woolley
Author: Amanda Ly
Author: Matthew Nunes
Author: Laura Oporto Lisboa
Author: Edmund Keogh
Author: John McBeth ORCID iD
Author: Beate Ehrhardt
Author: Amanda C. de C. Williams
Author: Christopher Eccleston

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×