The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Terrorist threats to the Olympics, 1972-2016

Terrorist threats to the Olympics, 1972-2016
Terrorist threats to the Olympics, 1972-2016
The chart below illustrates some of the key risks and security challenges that have faced Olympic planners since Munich, 1972. It represents the synopsis of a more expansive and detailed investigation into Olympic threats presented in Fussey et al. (2010). Debates inevitably occur over which activities are ‘terrorist’ and to what extent they are ‘Olympic-related’. This picture is further complicated by the IOC’s insistence that the Games are free of politics (for example, Rule 51, section 3 of the IOC’s Olympic Charter compels host cities to prevent protests of any kind near Olympic cities) – an initiative that may render any political statement a simultaneous act of Olympic resistance. For the purposes of the chart below, protests that may have drawn the attention of security planners – such as those surrounding the aboriginal Lubicon land claims during Calgary, 1988, protests over socio-economic inequality and the diversion of public monies to the Salt Lake City Olympics in 2002, or the ‘No Olympics on Stolen Land’ campaign at Vancouver, 2010 – are excluded. Instead, the focus is on actors and groups whose primary objective is an act of violence or sabotage in the first instance, rather than more legitimate protest movements that may become vehicles for more physical confrontations. So what constitutes an ‘Olympic-related’ threat? In many ways this is an impossible question to answer. Complicating factors include events that have taken place in a host nation prior to a Games that have no apparent connection to the event yet still occupy their related security planning and threat assessments.
Taylor & Francis
Fussey, P.
1553072f-da89-4ff8-963c-deb7bfd65c4f
Richards, Anthony
Fussey, Pete
Silke, Andrew
Fussey, P.
1553072f-da89-4ff8-963c-deb7bfd65c4f
Richards, Anthony
Fussey, Pete
Silke, Andrew

Fussey, P. (2010) Terrorist threats to the Olympics, 1972-2016. In, Richards, Anthony, Fussey, Pete and Silke, Andrew (eds.) Terrorism and the Olympics: Major Event Security and Lessons for the Future. London. Taylor & Francis. (doi:10.4324/9780203835227).

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

The chart below illustrates some of the key risks and security challenges that have faced Olympic planners since Munich, 1972. It represents the synopsis of a more expansive and detailed investigation into Olympic threats presented in Fussey et al. (2010). Debates inevitably occur over which activities are ‘terrorist’ and to what extent they are ‘Olympic-related’. This picture is further complicated by the IOC’s insistence that the Games are free of politics (for example, Rule 51, section 3 of the IOC’s Olympic Charter compels host cities to prevent protests of any kind near Olympic cities) – an initiative that may render any political statement a simultaneous act of Olympic resistance. For the purposes of the chart below, protests that may have drawn the attention of security planners – such as those surrounding the aboriginal Lubicon land claims during Calgary, 1988, protests over socio-economic inequality and the diversion of public monies to the Salt Lake City Olympics in 2002, or the ‘No Olympics on Stolen Land’ campaign at Vancouver, 2010 – are excluded. Instead, the focus is on actors and groups whose primary objective is an act of violence or sabotage in the first instance, rather than more legitimate protest movements that may become vehicles for more physical confrontations. So what constitutes an ‘Olympic-related’ threat? In many ways this is an impossible question to answer. Complicating factors include events that have taken place in a host nation prior to a Games that have no apparent connection to the event yet still occupy their related security planning and threat assessments.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2010

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 495055
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/495055
PURE UUID: b6498ab4-a0eb-4787-bc03-e7f14c696539
ORCID for P. Fussey: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1374-7133

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 Oct 2024 17:53
Last modified: 02 Nov 2024 03:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: P. Fussey ORCID iD
Editor: Anthony Richards
Editor: Pete Fussey
Editor: Andrew Silke

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×