The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

London's shadow legacies: Security and activism at the 2012 Olympics

London's shadow legacies: Security and activism at the 2012 Olympics
London's shadow legacies: Security and activism at the 2012 Olympics
When London organisers bid on the 2012 Summer Olympics, they promised an array of legacies, from economic and environmental to cultural and sport-related. In bid materials, Lord Sebastian Coe and his colleagues put forth a four-pronged vision for the Games: providing an unforgettable experience for athletes; forging a British sport legacy; regenerating East London economically and socially; and championing the Olympic Movement and the International Olympic Committee. But the 2012 London Olympics tendered a legacy not touted in bid materials: a revamped security state and riled-up activist communities. This article examines the dialectics of restriction and resistance: the ever-present dance between security forces and activists as they jockey for position and advantage in the public sphere. Drawing from government documents, media accounts, ethnographies and interviews with activists and security practitioners, we analyse these dialectics as played out in London in the run-up to, during and after the Olympics. First, we analyse literatures on repressive and coercive state policies and on the dissent and activism they inspire, giving special attention to specific Olympic processes. We then consider the urban setting that not only stages the Games, but also animates specific tensions on which security agencies and activists converge. This discussion is developed in the following section where we consider the measures adopted by state and private security forces for the London Games and examine the activist response to the Olympic juggernaut and how campaigners were replying to – sometimes tacitly and at other times explicitly – the state's actions. The paper concludes by considering how security practices, activism and their interrelationships contribute towards a range of less-visible legacies.

2158-2041
253-270
Boykoff, Jules
4c9db155-352c-4308-baeb-467b529368ac
Fussey, Pete
1553072f-da89-4ff8-963c-deb7bfd65c4f
Boykoff, Jules
4c9db155-352c-4308-baeb-467b529368ac
Fussey, Pete
1553072f-da89-4ff8-963c-deb7bfd65c4f

Boykoff, Jules and Fussey, Pete (2014) London's shadow legacies: Security and activism at the 2012 Olympics. Contemporary Social Science, 9 (2), 253-270. (doi:10.1080/21582041.2013.838292).

Record type: Article

Abstract

When London organisers bid on the 2012 Summer Olympics, they promised an array of legacies, from economic and environmental to cultural and sport-related. In bid materials, Lord Sebastian Coe and his colleagues put forth a four-pronged vision for the Games: providing an unforgettable experience for athletes; forging a British sport legacy; regenerating East London economically and socially; and championing the Olympic Movement and the International Olympic Committee. But the 2012 London Olympics tendered a legacy not touted in bid materials: a revamped security state and riled-up activist communities. This article examines the dialectics of restriction and resistance: the ever-present dance between security forces and activists as they jockey for position and advantage in the public sphere. Drawing from government documents, media accounts, ethnographies and interviews with activists and security practitioners, we analyse these dialectics as played out in London in the run-up to, during and after the Olympics. First, we analyse literatures on repressive and coercive state policies and on the dissent and activism they inspire, giving special attention to specific Olympic processes. We then consider the urban setting that not only stages the Games, but also animates specific tensions on which security agencies and activists converge. This discussion is developed in the following section where we consider the measures adopted by state and private security forces for the London Games and examine the activist response to the Olympic juggernaut and how campaigners were replying to – sometimes tacitly and at other times explicitly – the state's actions. The paper concludes by considering how security practices, activism and their interrelationships contribute towards a range of less-visible legacies.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 2 October 2013
Published date: 2014

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 495080
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/495080
ISSN: 2158-2041
PURE UUID: b9107d94-c46d-49e3-85b0-949030486431
ORCID for Pete Fussey: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1374-7133

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 Oct 2024 18:00
Last modified: 29 Oct 2024 03:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jules Boykoff
Author: Pete Fussey ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×