Command, control and contestation: negotiating security at the London 2012 Olympics
Command, control and contestation: negotiating security at the London 2012 Olympics
Mega-event security is often characterised as an exceptional exercise in terms of scale, scope and form, and considered variously through macro-theoretical lenses citing the assertion of overarching disciplinary, neoliberal, colonial corporatist and other interest-based aspirations. Based on empirical analysis of the London 2012 Olympic security operation and of those who resisted it (including data drawn from interviews and participant observations with key security agencies and activists), this paper interrogates the complex, diverse and often fragmented contestations over space across the Olympic neighbourhood. Despite the professed unity of purpose among Olympic planners (such as the protection of sponsors' access to the marketplace), more detailed analysis reveals both the application and purpose of ordering processes as contested and sometimes contradictory realms. Here, the longstanding recognition that space is used in simultaneously diverse ways is reflected in its control. Drawing on Foucauldian notions of security different impositions of order – regulatory, exclusionary, disciplinary, suggestive and assuasive – are argued to exist simultaneously in the same broadly defined area.
212-223
Fussey, Pete
1553072f-da89-4ff8-963c-deb7bfd65c4f
2015
Fussey, Pete
1553072f-da89-4ff8-963c-deb7bfd65c4f
Fussey, Pete
(2015)
Command, control and contestation: negotiating security at the London 2012 Olympics.
Geographical Journal, 181 (3), .
(doi:10.1111/geoj.12058).
Abstract
Mega-event security is often characterised as an exceptional exercise in terms of scale, scope and form, and considered variously through macro-theoretical lenses citing the assertion of overarching disciplinary, neoliberal, colonial corporatist and other interest-based aspirations. Based on empirical analysis of the London 2012 Olympic security operation and of those who resisted it (including data drawn from interviews and participant observations with key security agencies and activists), this paper interrogates the complex, diverse and often fragmented contestations over space across the Olympic neighbourhood. Despite the professed unity of purpose among Olympic planners (such as the protection of sponsors' access to the marketplace), more detailed analysis reveals both the application and purpose of ordering processes as contested and sometimes contradictory realms. Here, the longstanding recognition that space is used in simultaneously diverse ways is reflected in its control. Drawing on Foucauldian notions of security different impositions of order – regulatory, exclusionary, disciplinary, suggestive and assuasive – are argued to exist simultaneously in the same broadly defined area.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 10 December 2013
Published date: 2015
Additional Information:
This article also appears in:
Securitisation and the Mega-Event: Security and Surveillance at Mega Events
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 495105
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/495105
ISSN: 0016-7398
PURE UUID: 9a3dd1c9-202a-4290-8ec0-27507eb3531c
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 29 Oct 2024 17:41
Last modified: 30 Oct 2024 03:10
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Pete Fussey
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics