The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation, light intensity walking and a seated exercise trainer on venous return in healthy young adults: a quasi-experimental crossover study

Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation, light intensity walking and a seated exercise trainer on venous return in healthy young adults: a quasi-experimental crossover study
Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation, light intensity walking and a seated exercise trainer on venous return in healthy young adults: a quasi-experimental crossover study
Background/aims: the growing prevalence of sedentary behaviour across the life course is linked to an increased risk of chronic venous disease and related mortality, warranting the need for non-invasive interventions to improve blood flow and lower extremity function. The aim of this study was to investigate the change in venous blood flow, heart rate and blood pressure after 8 minutes of using the Leeper device, Circulation Booster and light intensity walking.

Methods: a quasi-experimental crossover study involving 11 participants (eight women, three men, mean age 23.91 years, standard deviation 1.04 years) was conducted using Leeper and Circulation Booster devices and light intensity walking. During each intervention, participants exercised for 8 minutes, and blood flow was recorded at 0, 4 and 8 minutes. Heart rate and blood pressure were recorded at 0 and 8 minutes. Blood flow was the primary outcome measure, and heart rate and blood pressure were secondary outcomes. Participants rested for 10 minutes between exercise. A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance was used to analyse the effect of intervention and time on blood flow, blood pressure and heart rate.

Results: there was no significant interaction between intervention and time on blood flow (P=0.180) indicating that blood flow did not change over time depending on intervention. There was no significant main effect of time on blood flow (P=0.206), indicating that no intervention caused a significant increase or decrease in blood flow after 8 minutes of exercise.

Conclusions: the interventions involving the Leeper and Circulation Booster devices and light intensity walking did not appear to significantly increase blood flow in young adults. Further studies involving participants from older age groups and those with pathological interventions are warranted to examine the potential effectiveness of these interventions.

Implications for practice: the findings may assist with the advice that allied health professionals provide regarding the use of seated exercise trainers and EMS devices and their ability to influence changes in blood flow.
1741-1645
Bluett, Shannon
047e77f7-c9e8-4eb4-9f23-22bc4aac11f7
Jones, Alfie
73357d45-537c-4f6a-bfd9-81c4d28dcff9
Pearson, Kallum
9cf0122d-8176-47fd-940a-21f567b4cf5d
Samuel, Dinesh
03b00738-9b9c-4c0a-a85a-cf43fc0932fc
Bluett, Shannon
047e77f7-c9e8-4eb4-9f23-22bc4aac11f7
Jones, Alfie
73357d45-537c-4f6a-bfd9-81c4d28dcff9
Pearson, Kallum
9cf0122d-8176-47fd-940a-21f567b4cf5d
Samuel, Dinesh
03b00738-9b9c-4c0a-a85a-cf43fc0932fc

Bluett, Shannon, Jones, Alfie, Pearson, Kallum and Samuel, Dinesh (2024) Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation, light intensity walking and a seated exercise trainer on venous return in healthy young adults: a quasi-experimental crossover study. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 31 (6). (doi:10.12968/ijtr.2023.0146).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background/aims: the growing prevalence of sedentary behaviour across the life course is linked to an increased risk of chronic venous disease and related mortality, warranting the need for non-invasive interventions to improve blood flow and lower extremity function. The aim of this study was to investigate the change in venous blood flow, heart rate and blood pressure after 8 minutes of using the Leeper device, Circulation Booster and light intensity walking.

Methods: a quasi-experimental crossover study involving 11 participants (eight women, three men, mean age 23.91 years, standard deviation 1.04 years) was conducted using Leeper and Circulation Booster devices and light intensity walking. During each intervention, participants exercised for 8 minutes, and blood flow was recorded at 0, 4 and 8 minutes. Heart rate and blood pressure were recorded at 0 and 8 minutes. Blood flow was the primary outcome measure, and heart rate and blood pressure were secondary outcomes. Participants rested for 10 minutes between exercise. A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance was used to analyse the effect of intervention and time on blood flow, blood pressure and heart rate.

Results: there was no significant interaction between intervention and time on blood flow (P=0.180) indicating that blood flow did not change over time depending on intervention. There was no significant main effect of time on blood flow (P=0.206), indicating that no intervention caused a significant increase or decrease in blood flow after 8 minutes of exercise.

Conclusions: the interventions involving the Leeper and Circulation Booster devices and light intensity walking did not appear to significantly increase blood flow in young adults. Further studies involving participants from older age groups and those with pathological interventions are warranted to examine the potential effectiveness of these interventions.

Implications for practice: the findings may assist with the advice that allied health professionals provide regarding the use of seated exercise trainers and EMS devices and their ability to influence changes in blood flow.

Text
IJTR Manuscript 18-04-2024 Accepted - Accepted Manuscript
Download (42kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 18 April 2024
Published date: 2 June 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 495128
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/495128
ISSN: 1741-1645
PURE UUID: 268813ae-9c9e-4ccd-80b1-a346a490c419
ORCID for Dinesh Samuel: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3610-8032

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Oct 2024 17:31
Last modified: 02 Dec 2024 05:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Shannon Bluett
Author: Alfie Jones
Author: Kallum Pearson
Author: Dinesh Samuel ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×