Eternal return? Social science perspectives of 'upstream' terrorist activities
Eternal return? Social science perspectives of 'upstream' terrorist activities
The 9/11 attacks stimulated an unprecedented academic interest in the study of terrorism; bringing a range of new disciplinary perspectives, theoretical frameworks and empirical tools to the subject. Within a broad social science perspective, this paper seeks to draw on these cross-disciplinary resources to understand pre-attack terrorist activities. In doing so, the paper first reviews some of the key themes relating to the study of terrorism including (but not restricted to) empirical values, the duplication of knowledge, points of consensus, and the focus on individual and deterministic features. The paper then examines conceptualizations of ‘terrorism as a process’ as they relates to pre-attack activities and considers current analyses relating to this issue. Here, temporal features of attack cycles are particularly prominent. The third area of analysis draws from a range of social science disciplines – including environmental psychology, human geography, sociology and criminology – to investigate the prospects of furnishing these accounts with spatial detail. These discussions are organized by a number of overarching arguments. These include: the importance of inter-relationships between counter-terrorism practice and precise understandings of terrorist action; and of exercising caution over deterministic pathways of action and accounts that focus too heavily on the individual level of action.
102-114
Fussey, P.
1553072f-da89-4ff8-963c-deb7bfd65c4f
19 June 2013
Fussey, P.
1553072f-da89-4ff8-963c-deb7bfd65c4f
Fussey, P.
(2013)
Eternal return? Social science perspectives of 'upstream' terrorist activities.
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, .
(doi:10.1007/s11896-013-9124-z).
Abstract
The 9/11 attacks stimulated an unprecedented academic interest in the study of terrorism; bringing a range of new disciplinary perspectives, theoretical frameworks and empirical tools to the subject. Within a broad social science perspective, this paper seeks to draw on these cross-disciplinary resources to understand pre-attack terrorist activities. In doing so, the paper first reviews some of the key themes relating to the study of terrorism including (but not restricted to) empirical values, the duplication of knowledge, points of consensus, and the focus on individual and deterministic features. The paper then examines conceptualizations of ‘terrorism as a process’ as they relates to pre-attack activities and considers current analyses relating to this issue. Here, temporal features of attack cycles are particularly prominent. The third area of analysis draws from a range of social science disciplines – including environmental psychology, human geography, sociology and criminology – to investigate the prospects of furnishing these accounts with spatial detail. These discussions are organized by a number of overarching arguments. These include: the importance of inter-relationships between counter-terrorism practice and precise understandings of terrorist action; and of exercising caution over deterministic pathways of action and accounts that focus too heavily on the individual level of action.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 19 June 2013
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 495149
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/495149
PURE UUID: bea0d548-e65d-4f31-ae96-fc0f0df3b1e6
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 Oct 2024 17:51
Last modified: 31 Oct 2024 03:16
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
P. Fussey
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics