Qualitative evaluation of a molecular point-of-care testing study for influenza in UK primary care
Qualitative evaluation of a molecular point-of-care testing study for influenza in UK primary care
Background: influenza contributes to the surge in winter infections and the consequent winter pressures on the health service. Molecular point-of-care testing(POCT) for influenza might improve patient management by providing rapid and accurate clinical diagnosis to inform the timely initiation of antiviral therapy and reduce unnecessary admissions and antibiotics use.
Aim: to explore factors that influence the adoption or non-adoption of POCT in English general practices and provide insights to enable its integration into routine practice workflows.
Design & setting: a qualitative implementation evaluation was conducted in ten general practices within the English national sentinel network (Oxford-RCGP Research and Surveillance Centre), from April to July 2023.
Method: using the non adoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability framework, data collection and analysis were conducted across ten practices. We made ethnographic observations of the POCT workflow and surveyed the practice staff for their perspectives on POCT implementation. Data were analysed using a mix of descriptive statistics, graphical modelling techniques and framework approach.
Results: ethnographic observations identified two modes of POCT integration into practice workflow: 1) clinician POCT workflow - typically involving batch testing due to time constraints, 2) research nurse/healthcare assistant POCT workflow - characterised by immediate testing of individual patients. Survey indicated that most primary care staff considered the POCT training offered was sufficient, and these practices were ready for change and had the capacity and resources to integrate POCT in workflows.
Conclusion: general practices should demonstrate flexibility in the workflow and workforce they deploy to integrate POCT into routine clinical workflow.
Xuan Xie, Charis
6688a3d5-5304-4bc9-a7fa-bf29fde8d120
Hoang, Uy
4eb5f7db-c76f-412f-9334-684c5c720337
Smylie, Jessica
6783e09b-2d81-4f83-afeb-c0e81439aa6e
Aspden, Carole
893bef6e-6519-4c97-97ca-4016f0e890ac
Button, Elizabeth
d4e6c893-f8a0-4012-b20e-5b588e4fddff
Okusi, Cecilia
272244e5-36cc-46d4-8647-1d58a643ee9c
Byford, Rachel
2d1f1ce4-d929-4fc4-81da-7f046a03c22b
Ferreira, Filipa
147f94b6-5622-499f-9711-30a0e385e5e0
Anand, Sneha
bdb7c960-356d-40a6-9b4a-a320743ecfc6
Agrawal, Utkarsh
285b0624-ade9-4a1e-a804-425c052c16bf
Inada-Kim, Matthew
070e8bca-65a9-4d3b-a65f-aae7233655f9
Clark, Tristan
712ec18e-613c-45df-a013-c8a22834e14f
de Lusignan, Simon
9233be29-94b2-40b3-b67e-03bff1214525
9 July 2024
Xuan Xie, Charis
6688a3d5-5304-4bc9-a7fa-bf29fde8d120
Hoang, Uy
4eb5f7db-c76f-412f-9334-684c5c720337
Smylie, Jessica
6783e09b-2d81-4f83-afeb-c0e81439aa6e
Aspden, Carole
893bef6e-6519-4c97-97ca-4016f0e890ac
Button, Elizabeth
d4e6c893-f8a0-4012-b20e-5b588e4fddff
Okusi, Cecilia
272244e5-36cc-46d4-8647-1d58a643ee9c
Byford, Rachel
2d1f1ce4-d929-4fc4-81da-7f046a03c22b
Ferreira, Filipa
147f94b6-5622-499f-9711-30a0e385e5e0
Anand, Sneha
bdb7c960-356d-40a6-9b4a-a320743ecfc6
Agrawal, Utkarsh
285b0624-ade9-4a1e-a804-425c052c16bf
Inada-Kim, Matthew
070e8bca-65a9-4d3b-a65f-aae7233655f9
Clark, Tristan
712ec18e-613c-45df-a013-c8a22834e14f
de Lusignan, Simon
9233be29-94b2-40b3-b67e-03bff1214525
Xuan Xie, Charis, Hoang, Uy, Smylie, Jessica, Aspden, Carole, Button, Elizabeth, Okusi, Cecilia, Byford, Rachel, Ferreira, Filipa, Anand, Sneha, Agrawal, Utkarsh, Inada-Kim, Matthew, Clark, Tristan and de Lusignan, Simon
(2024)
Qualitative evaluation of a molecular point-of-care testing study for influenza in UK primary care.
BMJ Open.
(doi:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0112).
Abstract
Background: influenza contributes to the surge in winter infections and the consequent winter pressures on the health service. Molecular point-of-care testing(POCT) for influenza might improve patient management by providing rapid and accurate clinical diagnosis to inform the timely initiation of antiviral therapy and reduce unnecessary admissions and antibiotics use.
Aim: to explore factors that influence the adoption or non-adoption of POCT in English general practices and provide insights to enable its integration into routine practice workflows.
Design & setting: a qualitative implementation evaluation was conducted in ten general practices within the English national sentinel network (Oxford-RCGP Research and Surveillance Centre), from April to July 2023.
Method: using the non adoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability framework, data collection and analysis were conducted across ten practices. We made ethnographic observations of the POCT workflow and surveyed the practice staff for their perspectives on POCT implementation. Data were analysed using a mix of descriptive statistics, graphical modelling techniques and framework approach.
Results: ethnographic observations identified two modes of POCT integration into practice workflow: 1) clinician POCT workflow - typically involving batch testing due to time constraints, 2) research nurse/healthcare assistant POCT workflow - characterised by immediate testing of individual patients. Survey indicated that most primary care staff considered the POCT training offered was sufficient, and these practices were ready for change and had the capacity and resources to integrate POCT in workflows.
Conclusion: general practices should demonstrate flexibility in the workflow and workforce they deploy to integrate POCT into routine clinical workflow.
Text
BJGPO.2024.0112.full
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 15 May 2024
Published date: 9 July 2024
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 495391
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/495391
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: 070528da-8dc2-4d79-8b50-95f94d9b784e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Nov 2024 17:53
Last modified: 13 Nov 2024 02:47
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Charis Xuan Xie
Author:
Uy Hoang
Author:
Jessica Smylie
Author:
Carole Aspden
Author:
Elizabeth Button
Author:
Cecilia Okusi
Author:
Rachel Byford
Author:
Filipa Ferreira
Author:
Sneha Anand
Author:
Utkarsh Agrawal
Author:
Matthew Inada-Kim
Author:
Simon de Lusignan
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics