The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Translation and Psychometric Properties of the Hebrew Version of Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP)

Translation and Psychometric Properties of the Hebrew Version of Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP)
Translation and Psychometric Properties of the Hebrew Version of Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP)
Background: low back pain (LBP) is a widespread cause of disability worldwide. Self-management is a significant factor impacting an individual's ability to cope with LBP. The Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP) assesses the ability of people with LBP to self-manage their illness.

Objective: this study aimed to (1) translate and culturally adapt the PEI-BP into Hebrew and (2) evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness.

Design: cross-sectional study with a nested prospective sub‐sample.

Methods: the PEI-BP was translated and culturally adapted into Hebrew using recommended guidelines. We included 188 LBP patients. The psychometric properties of the PEI-BP were evaluated according to the COSMIN methodology. For construct validity, the Ronald Morris disability questionnaire, the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire-physical activity, the 12-item Short‐Form Health Survey mental health, and the Numerical pain rating scale were included. To assess reliability, a sub-sample of participants (n=50) completed the PEI-BP again after one week and after six weeks (n=50) to evaluate responsiveness.

Results: the PEI-BP demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.821) and test-retest reliability (ICC=0.77). For construct validity, four out of the five hypothesized correlations were confirmed. Responsiveness showed a Receiver Operating Characteristic curve area of 0.81 (95% CI 0.67-0.93); the minimal detectable change was 14.5. A potential significant ceiling but no floor effects were observed (17.5% and 6.4%, respectively).

Conclusions: the translation and validation of the PEI-BP suggest that it is a feasible, reliable, valid, and responsive instrument for evaluating 'patient enablement' with LBP in the Hebrew-speaking population.
Low back pain, Self-management, The patient enablement instrument for back pain, Translation, Validation
2468-7812
Levin, Aviya
d18d8b58-d7a9-408c-b4c0-4bbfb17a2696
Goldstein, Ruth
9cb9b17c-74f2-4970-b09b-b212d788710e
Hartvigsen, Jan
287a4d8f-0f45-4e2d-917f-99eb7f6ac8ea
Lauridsen, Henrik Hein
915e059b-e69d-42ee-b051-909ee153d5d9
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
Ben Ami, Noa
99af5f24-d185-4fd7-8059-fee3baf7690d
Levin, Aviya
d18d8b58-d7a9-408c-b4c0-4bbfb17a2696
Goldstein, Ruth
9cb9b17c-74f2-4970-b09b-b212d788710e
Hartvigsen, Jan
287a4d8f-0f45-4e2d-917f-99eb7f6ac8ea
Lauridsen, Henrik Hein
915e059b-e69d-42ee-b051-909ee153d5d9
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
Ben Ami, Noa
99af5f24-d185-4fd7-8059-fee3baf7690d

Levin, Aviya, Goldstein, Ruth, Hartvigsen, Jan, Lauridsen, Henrik Hein, Pincus, Tamar and Ben Ami, Noa (2024) Translation and Psychometric Properties of the Hebrew Version of Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP). Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, 74, [103202]. (doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103202).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: low back pain (LBP) is a widespread cause of disability worldwide. Self-management is a significant factor impacting an individual's ability to cope with LBP. The Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP) assesses the ability of people with LBP to self-manage their illness.

Objective: this study aimed to (1) translate and culturally adapt the PEI-BP into Hebrew and (2) evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness.

Design: cross-sectional study with a nested prospective sub‐sample.

Methods: the PEI-BP was translated and culturally adapted into Hebrew using recommended guidelines. We included 188 LBP patients. The psychometric properties of the PEI-BP were evaluated according to the COSMIN methodology. For construct validity, the Ronald Morris disability questionnaire, the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire-physical activity, the 12-item Short‐Form Health Survey mental health, and the Numerical pain rating scale were included. To assess reliability, a sub-sample of participants (n=50) completed the PEI-BP again after one week and after six weeks (n=50) to evaluate responsiveness.

Results: the PEI-BP demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.821) and test-retest reliability (ICC=0.77). For construct validity, four out of the five hypothesized correlations were confirmed. Responsiveness showed a Receiver Operating Characteristic curve area of 0.81 (95% CI 0.67-0.93); the minimal detectable change was 14.5. A potential significant ceiling but no floor effects were observed (17.5% and 6.4%, respectively).

Conclusions: the translation and validation of the PEI-BP suggest that it is a feasible, reliable, valid, and responsive instrument for evaluating 'patient enablement' with LBP in the Hebrew-speaking population.

Text
manuscript_revised_CLEAN_29.9.24 - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 14 October 2025.
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 5 October 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 14 October 2024
Keywords: Low back pain, Self-management, The patient enablement instrument for back pain, Translation, Validation

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 495485
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/495485
ISSN: 2468-7812
PURE UUID: 4fbd3950-f112-48ef-bc4a-0e7399550d40
ORCID for Tamar Pincus: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3172-5624

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Nov 2024 17:53
Last modified: 19 Nov 2024 03:02

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Aviya Levin
Author: Ruth Goldstein
Author: Jan Hartvigsen
Author: Henrik Hein Lauridsen
Author: Tamar Pincus ORCID iD
Author: Noa Ben Ami

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×