The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Could've known better

Could've known better
Could've known better
Could you have taken precautions against a risk you were unaware of ? This question lies at the heart of debates in ethics and legal philosophy concerning whether it’s justifiable to blame or punish those who cause harm inadvertently or out of ignorance. But the question is crucially ambiguous, depending on what is understood to be inside or outside the scope of the ‘could’. And this ambiguity undermines a number of arguments purporting to show that inadvertent wrongdoers cannot justifiably be blamed or punished. While not all opposition to blaming or punishing inadvertent wrongdoers rests on this ambiguity, some certainly does. And getting clear on this ambiguity is important if we’re to sort good arguments against blaming and punishing inadvertent wrongdoers—if there are any—from bad ones.
0031-8094
Greenberg, Alexander
0f529d9c-1683-4f2d-94e5-2863e31a9c25
Greenberg, Alexander
0f529d9c-1683-4f2d-94e5-2863e31a9c25

Greenberg, Alexander (2024) Could've known better. The Philosophical Quarterly, [pqae130]. (doi:10.1093/pq/pqae130).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Could you have taken precautions against a risk you were unaware of ? This question lies at the heart of debates in ethics and legal philosophy concerning whether it’s justifiable to blame or punish those who cause harm inadvertently or out of ignorance. But the question is crucially ambiguous, depending on what is understood to be inside or outside the scope of the ‘could’. And this ambiguity undermines a number of arguments purporting to show that inadvertent wrongdoers cannot justifiably be blamed or punished. While not all opposition to blaming or punishing inadvertent wrongdoers rests on this ambiguity, some certainly does. And getting clear on this ambiguity is important if we’re to sort good arguments against blaming and punishing inadvertent wrongdoers—if there are any—from bad ones.

Text
pqae130 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (417kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 1 October 2024
Published date: 22 October 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 495490
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/495490
ISSN: 0031-8094
PURE UUID: 7cfc581e-68ba-4e32-89f9-f30bb319d05e

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Nov 2024 18:00
Last modified: 14 Nov 2024 18:00

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×