Aerostructural optimization and comparative study of twin-fuselage and strut-braced-wing aircraft configurations
Aerostructural optimization and comparative study of twin-fuselage and strut-braced-wing aircraft configurations
The ultrahigh-aspect-ratio wing (UHARW) concept is a promising configuration to achieve future sustainable aviation goals. Twin-fuselage (TF) and strut-braced-wing (SBW) configurations are characterized by smaller structural bending moments and shear forces in the wing and are promising concepts for realizing UHARW designs. This paper addresses the aerostructural optimization problem of TF and SBW configurations with UHARW by using a coupled adjoint aerostructural optimization tool, which is composed of a geometrically nonlinear structural solver and a quasi-three-dimensional natural laminar flow (NLF) aerodynamic solver. The optimization results show significant improvements in fuel efficiency and performance for the TF and SBW aircraft, with fuel mass reductions of 13 and 10%, respectively, compared to the corresponding baseline aircraft designed in the conceptual design phase. In comparison to the original reference aircraft A320neo, the optimized TF and SBW have 48 and 31% lower fuel weights, respectively. The NLF range of both upper and lower wing surfaces is expanded during optimization. The optimized SBW configuration has a wing aspect ratio of 26.01, while the optimized TF has a wing aspect ratio of 20.74, indicating that the SBW concept is more conducive to realizing UHARW design compared with the TF configuration studied in this work. The optimized TF aircraft has a lighter fuel weight and gross weight compared to the optimized SBW aircraft, which is because the TF aircraft has a lighter operational empty weight, including a lighter fuselage structural weight, landing gear weight, etc., whereas the top-level aircraft requirements are the same for both aircraft, including range, payload, and cruise Mach.
Ma, Yiyuan
ccea8698-10f9-4f34-9cc7-c4983400b103
Abouhamzeh, Morteza
49ed0a64-90b2-464c-adc6-2ad92d72ab43
Elham, Ali
676043c6-547a-4081-8521-1567885ad41a
Ma, Yiyuan
ccea8698-10f9-4f34-9cc7-c4983400b103
Abouhamzeh, Morteza
49ed0a64-90b2-464c-adc6-2ad92d72ab43
Elham, Ali
676043c6-547a-4081-8521-1567885ad41a
Ma, Yiyuan, Abouhamzeh, Morteza and Elham, Ali
(2023)
Aerostructural optimization and comparative study of twin-fuselage and strut-braced-wing aircraft configurations.
Journal of Aircraft, 61 (3).
(doi:10.2514/1.c037388).
Abstract
The ultrahigh-aspect-ratio wing (UHARW) concept is a promising configuration to achieve future sustainable aviation goals. Twin-fuselage (TF) and strut-braced-wing (SBW) configurations are characterized by smaller structural bending moments and shear forces in the wing and are promising concepts for realizing UHARW designs. This paper addresses the aerostructural optimization problem of TF and SBW configurations with UHARW by using a coupled adjoint aerostructural optimization tool, which is composed of a geometrically nonlinear structural solver and a quasi-three-dimensional natural laminar flow (NLF) aerodynamic solver. The optimization results show significant improvements in fuel efficiency and performance for the TF and SBW aircraft, with fuel mass reductions of 13 and 10%, respectively, compared to the corresponding baseline aircraft designed in the conceptual design phase. In comparison to the original reference aircraft A320neo, the optimized TF and SBW have 48 and 31% lower fuel weights, respectively. The NLF range of both upper and lower wing surfaces is expanded during optimization. The optimized SBW configuration has a wing aspect ratio of 26.01, while the optimized TF has a wing aspect ratio of 20.74, indicating that the SBW concept is more conducive to realizing UHARW design compared with the TF configuration studied in this work. The optimized TF aircraft has a lighter fuel weight and gross weight compared to the optimized SBW aircraft, which is because the TF aircraft has a lighter operational empty weight, including a lighter fuselage structural weight, landing gear weight, etc., whereas the top-level aircraft requirements are the same for both aircraft, including range, payload, and cruise Mach.
Text
SBW_TF_AeroStruct_Opt
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 2 November 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 9 December 2023
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 495491
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/495491
ISSN: 0021-8669
PURE UUID: 88787a75-7453-4df9-9219-a761581ac631
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 14 Nov 2024 18:04
Last modified: 14 Nov 2024 18:04
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Yiyuan Ma
Author:
Morteza Abouhamzeh
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics