The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A critical analysis of UK media characterisations of Long Covid in children and young people

A critical analysis of UK media characterisations of Long Covid in children and young people
A critical analysis of UK media characterisations of Long Covid in children and young people
Long Covid is the continuation or development of symptoms related to a SARSCoV2 infection. Those with Long Covid may face epistemic injustice, where they are unjustifiably viewed as unreliable evaluators of their own illness experiences. Media articles both reflect and influence perception and subsequently how people regard children and young people (CYP) with Long Covid, and may contribute to epistemic injustice. We aimed to explore how the UK media characterises Long Covid in CYP through examining three key actor groups: parents, healthcare professionals, and CYP with Long Covid, through the lens of epistemic injustice. A systematic search strategy resulted in the inclusion of 103 UK media articles. We used an adapted corpus-assisted Critical Discourse Analysis in tandem with thematic analysis. Specifically, we utilised search terms to locate concordances of key actor groups. In the corpus, parents highlighted minimisation of Long Covid, barriers to care, and experiences of personal attacks. Mothers were presented as also having Long Covid. Fathers were unmentioned. Healthcare professionals emphasised the rarity of Long Covid in CYP, avoided pathologising Long Covid, and overemphasised psychological components. CYP were rarely consulted in media articles but were presented as formerly very able. Manifestations of Long Covid in CYP were validated or invalidated in relation to adults. Media characterisations contributed to epistemic injustice. The disempowering portrayal of parents promotes stigma and barriers to care. Healthcare professionals’ narratives often contributed to negative healthcare experiences and enacted testimonial injustice, where CYP and parents’ credibility was diminished due to unfair identity prejudice, in their invalidation of Long Covid. Media characterisations reveal and maintain a lack of societal framework for understanding Long Covid in CYP. The findings of this study illustrate the discursive practices employed by journalists that contribute to experiences of epistemic injustice. Based on our findings, we propose recommendations for journalists.
2767-3375
Connor, Chloe
3b632888-358d-4b89-b595-cfb8aa10f689
Kranert, Michael
2054176a-2b70-491b-9ee7-5388ae25296f
Mckelvie, Sara
61c92fa0-fa9f-4d59-988d-6e669d8f8f32
Clutterbuck, Donna
b5afd11c-fbc3-422c-8c88-296146d9db02
Mcfarland, Sammie
9d34c229-4096-4c37-a373-8e61647a6df5
Alwan, Nisreen A.
0d37b320-f325-4ed3-ba51-0fe2866d5382
Connor, Chloe
3b632888-358d-4b89-b595-cfb8aa10f689
Kranert, Michael
2054176a-2b70-491b-9ee7-5388ae25296f
Mckelvie, Sara
61c92fa0-fa9f-4d59-988d-6e669d8f8f32
Clutterbuck, Donna
b5afd11c-fbc3-422c-8c88-296146d9db02
Mcfarland, Sammie
9d34c229-4096-4c37-a373-8e61647a6df5
Alwan, Nisreen A.
0d37b320-f325-4ed3-ba51-0fe2866d5382

Connor, Chloe, Kranert, Michael, Mckelvie, Sara, Clutterbuck, Donna, Mcfarland, Sammie and Alwan, Nisreen A. (2024) A critical analysis of UK media characterisations of Long Covid in children and young people. PLOS Global Public Health, 4 (11), [e0003126]. (doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0003126).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Long Covid is the continuation or development of symptoms related to a SARSCoV2 infection. Those with Long Covid may face epistemic injustice, where they are unjustifiably viewed as unreliable evaluators of their own illness experiences. Media articles both reflect and influence perception and subsequently how people regard children and young people (CYP) with Long Covid, and may contribute to epistemic injustice. We aimed to explore how the UK media characterises Long Covid in CYP through examining three key actor groups: parents, healthcare professionals, and CYP with Long Covid, through the lens of epistemic injustice. A systematic search strategy resulted in the inclusion of 103 UK media articles. We used an adapted corpus-assisted Critical Discourse Analysis in tandem with thematic analysis. Specifically, we utilised search terms to locate concordances of key actor groups. In the corpus, parents highlighted minimisation of Long Covid, barriers to care, and experiences of personal attacks. Mothers were presented as also having Long Covid. Fathers were unmentioned. Healthcare professionals emphasised the rarity of Long Covid in CYP, avoided pathologising Long Covid, and overemphasised psychological components. CYP were rarely consulted in media articles but were presented as formerly very able. Manifestations of Long Covid in CYP were validated or invalidated in relation to adults. Media characterisations contributed to epistemic injustice. The disempowering portrayal of parents promotes stigma and barriers to care. Healthcare professionals’ narratives often contributed to negative healthcare experiences and enacted testimonial injustice, where CYP and parents’ credibility was diminished due to unfair identity prejudice, in their invalidation of Long Covid. Media characterisations reveal and maintain a lack of societal framework for understanding Long Covid in CYP. The findings of this study illustrate the discursive practices employed by journalists that contribute to experiences of epistemic injustice. Based on our findings, we propose recommendations for journalists.

Text
PLOS GPH accepted MS - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (183kB)
Text
journal.pgph.0003126 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 1 October 2024
Published date: 27 November 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 495652
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/495652
ISSN: 2767-3375
PURE UUID: 37d036f7-3224-4c6a-9e0b-2f868b3dceb3
ORCID for Michael Kranert: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0270-7136
ORCID for Sara Mckelvie: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3781-9813
ORCID for Donna Clutterbuck: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5622-3076
ORCID for Nisreen A. Alwan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4134-8463

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Nov 2024 17:35
Last modified: 30 Nov 2024 03:08

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Chloe Connor
Author: Michael Kranert ORCID iD
Author: Sara Mckelvie ORCID iD
Author: Donna Clutterbuck ORCID iD
Author: Sammie Mcfarland

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×