The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Radical empiricism, British idealism, and the reality of relations

Radical empiricism, British idealism, and the reality of relations
Radical empiricism, British idealism, and the reality of relations
This chapter focuses on the relationship between James and Bradley, and their metaphysical disputes around the reality of relations and the nature of immediate experience. The respect that Bradley accorded to radical empiricism was clearly in part due to the similarity he saw between it and his own monistic idealism. James also appreciated this similarity. In fact, both the public and private correspondence between the two is haunted by a palpable frustration – a frustration which comes from the lurking sense that it is only one or two confusions or misinterpretations which block the two thinkers from heartfelt agreement. According to James, both the classical empiricists and the idealists make the same mistake: they assume that the manifold of feeling is discontinuous. The final feature of James’s radical empiricism to note is that experience is neutral between subject and object:The instant field of the present is at all times what I call the ‘pure experience’.
Routledge
Williams, Neil W.
401e2487-a30a-4dd4-8955-55cca4c378a7
Marchetti, Sarin
Williams, Neil W.
401e2487-a30a-4dd4-8955-55cca4c378a7
Marchetti, Sarin

Williams, Neil W. (2021) Radical empiricism, British idealism, and the reality of relations. In, Marchetti, Sarin (ed.) The Jamesian Mind. 1 ed. Routledge. (doi:10.4324/9780429029639).

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the relationship between James and Bradley, and their metaphysical disputes around the reality of relations and the nature of immediate experience. The respect that Bradley accorded to radical empiricism was clearly in part due to the similarity he saw between it and his own monistic idealism. James also appreciated this similarity. In fact, both the public and private correspondence between the two is haunted by a palpable frustration – a frustration which comes from the lurking sense that it is only one or two confusions or misinterpretations which block the two thinkers from heartfelt agreement. According to James, both the classical empiricists and the idealists make the same mistake: they assume that the manifold of feeling is discontinuous. The final feature of James’s radical empiricism to note is that experience is neutral between subject and object:The instant field of the present is at all times what I call the ‘pure experience’.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 29 December 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 495890
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/495890
PURE UUID: 01bf1019-017d-4515-ac0e-b9ae46f54766
ORCID for Neil W. Williams: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3478-1864

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Nov 2024 17:49
Last modified: 27 Nov 2024 03:10

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Neil W. Williams ORCID iD
Editor: Sarin Marchetti

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×