Animals, common heritage and common concern
Animals, common heritage and common concern
This chapter analyses the internationalisation and globalisation of the protection of wildlife in international law through the common heritage of humankind and common concern of humankind. The analysis indicates that the ‘common heritage’ has had little impact on wildlife in international law due to its restricted application to the deep seabed and the Moon, and I indicate that the contentious proposal to internationalise wildlife within the territorial borders of states through the declaration of these resources as the ‘common concern’ is problematic and unsound. Rather, the ‘common concern’ is a more suitable vehicle to recognise the global dimension of wildlife. ‘Common concern’ seems to be in opposition to the permanent sovereignty over wildlife and requires a reconciliation through the acceptance of custodial sovereignty, which recognises the global dimension of wildlife and a communitarian and custodial approach to the conservation and sustainable use of wildlife. This article argues for an evolutionary interpretation of the sustainable use of wildlife, which incorporates welfare concerns under the rubric of sustainable development. Thus, I suggest that ‘common concern’ also globalises welfare concerns which could ultimately strengthen the progressive development of Global Animal Law.
Scholtz, Werner
4e8ad72b-807a-4aee-bee3-203f038a0a8c
Scholtz, Werner
4e8ad72b-807a-4aee-bee3-203f038a0a8c
Scholtz, Werner
(2024)
Animals, common heritage and common concern.
In,
Peters, Anne and Stucki, Saskia
(eds.)
Oxford Handbook on Global Animal LAw.
Oxford University Press.
(In Press)
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
This chapter analyses the internationalisation and globalisation of the protection of wildlife in international law through the common heritage of humankind and common concern of humankind. The analysis indicates that the ‘common heritage’ has had little impact on wildlife in international law due to its restricted application to the deep seabed and the Moon, and I indicate that the contentious proposal to internationalise wildlife within the territorial borders of states through the declaration of these resources as the ‘common concern’ is problematic and unsound. Rather, the ‘common concern’ is a more suitable vehicle to recognise the global dimension of wildlife. ‘Common concern’ seems to be in opposition to the permanent sovereignty over wildlife and requires a reconciliation through the acceptance of custodial sovereignty, which recognises the global dimension of wildlife and a communitarian and custodial approach to the conservation and sustainable use of wildlife. This article argues for an evolutionary interpretation of the sustainable use of wildlife, which incorporates welfare concerns under the rubric of sustainable development. Thus, I suggest that ‘common concern’ also globalises welfare concerns which could ultimately strengthen the progressive development of Global Animal Law.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 1 July 2024
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 495967
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/495967
PURE UUID: 48713109-65be-43be-8d21-1cfc681dbeb2
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 28 Nov 2024 17:35
Last modified: 30 Nov 2024 03:05
Export record
Contributors
Editor:
Anne Peters
Editor:
Saskia Stucki
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics