The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Fanaticism, dogmatism, and collective belief

Fanaticism, dogmatism, and collective belief
Fanaticism, dogmatism, and collective belief
This chapter explores the connection between collective belief and dogmatism, arguing that collective belief, properly construed, need not tend towards dogmatism, and, in fact, can be perfectly respectable and responsible from an epistemic perspective. In order to make this argument, I first draw a distinction between two forms of “firmness” in belief: doxastic dogmatism, which is an epistemic vice characterized by stubbornness and rigidity, and doxastic doggedness, which is an epistemic virtue characterized by cognitive self-trust and steadiness. I then examine in some detail Margaret Gilbert’s account of collective belief, according to which collective belief is a matter of several people being jointly committed to doing something together, namely to emulating a single believer of a given proposition. There are two very different ways of fleshing out the object of this joint commitment, and so two different ways of construing just what is involved in collective belief. On the attitude-centred approach—the a
Routledge
Townsend, Leo
8f4f19b2-8d93-4ce5-a772-56a758369dc0
Townsend, Leo
Rebecca Tietjen, Ruth
Schmidt, Hans Bernhard
Staudigl, Michael
Townsend, Leo
8f4f19b2-8d93-4ce5-a772-56a758369dc0
Townsend, Leo
Rebecca Tietjen, Ruth
Schmidt, Hans Bernhard
Staudigl, Michael

Townsend, Leo (2022) Fanaticism, dogmatism, and collective belief. In, Townsend, Leo, Rebecca Tietjen, Ruth, Schmidt, Hans Bernhard and Staudigl, Michael (eds.) The Philosophy of Fanaticism. Routledge. (doi:10.4324/9781003119371-5).

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

This chapter explores the connection between collective belief and dogmatism, arguing that collective belief, properly construed, need not tend towards dogmatism, and, in fact, can be perfectly respectable and responsible from an epistemic perspective. In order to make this argument, I first draw a distinction between two forms of “firmness” in belief: doxastic dogmatism, which is an epistemic vice characterized by stubbornness and rigidity, and doxastic doggedness, which is an epistemic virtue characterized by cognitive self-trust and steadiness. I then examine in some detail Margaret Gilbert’s account of collective belief, according to which collective belief is a matter of several people being jointly committed to doing something together, namely to emulating a single believer of a given proposition. There are two very different ways of fleshing out the object of this joint commitment, and so two different ways of construing just what is involved in collective belief. On the attitude-centred approach—the a

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 26 July 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 495989
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/495989
PURE UUID: cc4c2c5a-c456-4836-b385-bac69e2d5c30
ORCID for Leo Townsend: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5992-162X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 Nov 2024 17:48
Last modified: 30 Nov 2024 03:17

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Leo Townsend ORCID iD
Editor: Leo Townsend
Editor: Ruth Rebecca Tietjen
Editor: Hans Bernhard Schmidt
Editor: Michael Staudigl

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×