Selecting successful students? Undergraduate grades as an admission criterion
Selecting successful students? Undergraduate grades as an admission criterion
In Europe’s reformed education system, universities may be forced by law to consider undergraduate grade point average (UGPA) as the primary admission criterion in the selection of graduate students. In this article, we investigate whether UGPA predicts graduate student performance in order to discuss its usefulness as an admission criterion. In our theoretical framework, we show that undergraduate students may choose slower study progress in favour of receiving higher grades and conclude that UGPA is a relatively good (weak) predictor for graduate grade point average (study progress). Having data from a cohort of students whose selection was in clear conflict with the legal requirement, we empirically confirm our theoretical predictions by exploiting a unique opportunity for assessing educational policies. Discussion of our findings leads to some important conclusions concerning the Bologna reforms and the lawmakers’ idea of giving some independence to universities, but not too much of it.
Educational policies, academic performance, economics and law, graduate student selection, student’s utility, study progress, time preferences
3089-3105
Chadi, Adrian
9b86c34e-9340-465f-a4c0-492202a0958a
de Pinto, Marco
a40b344b-3984-4069-ad0b-5b505de90afc
25 December 2017
Chadi, Adrian
9b86c34e-9340-465f-a4c0-492202a0958a
de Pinto, Marco
a40b344b-3984-4069-ad0b-5b505de90afc
Chadi, Adrian and de Pinto, Marco
(2017)
Selecting successful students? Undergraduate grades as an admission criterion.
Applied Economics, 50 (28), .
(doi:10.1080/00036846.2017.1418072).
Abstract
In Europe’s reformed education system, universities may be forced by law to consider undergraduate grade point average (UGPA) as the primary admission criterion in the selection of graduate students. In this article, we investigate whether UGPA predicts graduate student performance in order to discuss its usefulness as an admission criterion. In our theoretical framework, we show that undergraduate students may choose slower study progress in favour of receiving higher grades and conclude that UGPA is a relatively good (weak) predictor for graduate grade point average (study progress). Having data from a cohort of students whose selection was in clear conflict with the legal requirement, we empirically confirm our theoretical predictions by exploiting a unique opportunity for assessing educational policies. Discussion of our findings leads to some important conclusions concerning the Bologna reforms and the lawmakers’ idea of giving some independence to universities, but not too much of it.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 25 December 2017
Keywords:
Educational policies, academic performance, economics and law, graduate student selection, student’s utility, study progress, time preferences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 496035
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/496035
ISSN: 0003-6846
PURE UUID: c5487ee9-2281-4918-862d-7c7f8f4d1577
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 02 Dec 2024 17:31
Last modified: 17 Dec 2024 03:11
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Adrian Chadi
Author:
Marco de Pinto
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics