The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Selecting successful students? Undergraduate grades as an admission criterion

Selecting successful students? Undergraduate grades as an admission criterion
Selecting successful students? Undergraduate grades as an admission criterion
In Europe’s reformed education system, universities may be forced by law to consider undergraduate grade point average (UGPA) as the primary admission criterion in the selection of graduate students. In this article, we investigate whether UGPA predicts graduate student performance in order to discuss its usefulness as an admission criterion. In our theoretical framework, we show that undergraduate students may choose slower study progress in favour of receiving higher grades and conclude that UGPA is a relatively good (weak) predictor for graduate grade point average (study progress). Having data from a cohort of students whose selection was in clear conflict with the legal requirement, we empirically confirm our theoretical predictions by exploiting a unique opportunity for assessing educational policies. Discussion of our findings leads to some important conclusions concerning the Bologna reforms and the lawmakers’ idea of giving some independence to universities, but not too much of it.
Educational policies, academic performance, economics and law, graduate student selection, student’s utility, study progress, time preferences
0003-6846
3089-3105
Chadi, Adrian
9b86c34e-9340-465f-a4c0-492202a0958a
de Pinto, Marco
a40b344b-3984-4069-ad0b-5b505de90afc
Chadi, Adrian
9b86c34e-9340-465f-a4c0-492202a0958a
de Pinto, Marco
a40b344b-3984-4069-ad0b-5b505de90afc

Chadi, Adrian and de Pinto, Marco (2017) Selecting successful students? Undergraduate grades as an admission criterion. Applied Economics, 50 (28), 3089-3105. (doi:10.1080/00036846.2017.1418072).

Record type: Article

Abstract

In Europe’s reformed education system, universities may be forced by law to consider undergraduate grade point average (UGPA) as the primary admission criterion in the selection of graduate students. In this article, we investigate whether UGPA predicts graduate student performance in order to discuss its usefulness as an admission criterion. In our theoretical framework, we show that undergraduate students may choose slower study progress in favour of receiving higher grades and conclude that UGPA is a relatively good (weak) predictor for graduate grade point average (study progress). Having data from a cohort of students whose selection was in clear conflict with the legal requirement, we empirically confirm our theoretical predictions by exploiting a unique opportunity for assessing educational policies. Discussion of our findings leads to some important conclusions concerning the Bologna reforms and the lawmakers’ idea of giving some independence to universities, but not too much of it.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 25 December 2017
Keywords: Educational policies, academic performance, economics and law, graduate student selection, student’s utility, study progress, time preferences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 496035
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/496035
ISSN: 0003-6846
PURE UUID: c5487ee9-2281-4918-862d-7c7f8f4d1577
ORCID for Adrian Chadi: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2008-0653

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 Dec 2024 17:31
Last modified: 17 Dec 2024 03:11

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Adrian Chadi ORCID iD
Author: Marco de Pinto

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×