Deep brain stimulation for pain relief: a meta-analysis
Deep brain stimulation for pain relief: a meta-analysis
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been used to treat intractable pain for over 50 years. Variations in targets and surgical technique complicate the interpretation of many studies. To better understand its efficacy, we performed a meta-analysis of DBS for pain relief. MEDLINE (1966 to February 2003) and EMBASE (1980 to January 2003) databases were searched using key words deep brain stimulation, sensory thalamus, periventricular gray and pain. Inclusion criteria were based on patient characteristics and protocol clarity. Six studies (between 1977–1997) fitting the criteria were identified. Stimulation sites included the periventricular/periaqueductal grey matter (PVG/PAG), internal capsule (IC), and sensory thalamus (ST). The long-term pain alleviation rate was highest with DBS of the PVG/PAG (79%), or the PVG/PAG plus sensory thalamus/internal capsule (87%). Stimulation of the sensory thalamus alone was less effective (58% long-term success) (p < 0.05). DBS was more effective for nociceptive than deafferentation pain (63% vs 47% long-term success; p < 0.01). Long-term success was attained in over 80% of patients with intractable low back pain (failed back surgery) following successful trial stimulation. Trial stimulation was successful in approximately 50% of those with post-stroke pain, and 58% of patients permanently implanted achieved ongoing pain relief. Higher rates of success were seen with phantom limb pain and neuropathies. We conclude that DBS is frequently effective when used in well-selected patients. Neuroimaging and neuromodulation technology advances complicate the application of these results to modern practice. Ongoing investigations should shed further light on this complex clinical conundrum.
deep brain stimulation, pain, failed back surgery, phantom limb pain, pain relief
515-519
Bittar, R.G.
398d329d-2830-44f9-8e06-5e868e226dd4
Kar-Purkayastha, I.
5c12db81-9512-4dcb-8432-6bc54622f262
Owen, S.L.
47aa18a3-4151-4bc2-a447-2998a6c62daf
Bear, R.E.
10b5a13c-a1ef-4917-ac14-19c8d10dd94f
Green, A.
39b5daa6-0aa7-4ab6-9e1b-e52748ef98e3
Wang, S.
8bce5bdb-420c-4b22-b009-8f4ce1febaa8
Aziz, T.Z.
728d8821-5fa0-407f-a09f-5a52038ad170
June 2005
Bittar, R.G.
398d329d-2830-44f9-8e06-5e868e226dd4
Kar-Purkayastha, I.
5c12db81-9512-4dcb-8432-6bc54622f262
Owen, S.L.
47aa18a3-4151-4bc2-a447-2998a6c62daf
Bear, R.E.
10b5a13c-a1ef-4917-ac14-19c8d10dd94f
Green, A.
39b5daa6-0aa7-4ab6-9e1b-e52748ef98e3
Wang, S.
8bce5bdb-420c-4b22-b009-8f4ce1febaa8
Aziz, T.Z.
728d8821-5fa0-407f-a09f-5a52038ad170
Bittar, R.G., Kar-Purkayastha, I., Owen, S.L., Bear, R.E., Green, A., Wang, S. and Aziz, T.Z.
(2005)
Deep brain stimulation for pain relief: a meta-analysis.
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 12 (5), .
(doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2004.10.005).
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been used to treat intractable pain for over 50 years. Variations in targets and surgical technique complicate the interpretation of many studies. To better understand its efficacy, we performed a meta-analysis of DBS for pain relief. MEDLINE (1966 to February 2003) and EMBASE (1980 to January 2003) databases were searched using key words deep brain stimulation, sensory thalamus, periventricular gray and pain. Inclusion criteria were based on patient characteristics and protocol clarity. Six studies (between 1977–1997) fitting the criteria were identified. Stimulation sites included the periventricular/periaqueductal grey matter (PVG/PAG), internal capsule (IC), and sensory thalamus (ST). The long-term pain alleviation rate was highest with DBS of the PVG/PAG (79%), or the PVG/PAG plus sensory thalamus/internal capsule (87%). Stimulation of the sensory thalamus alone was less effective (58% long-term success) (p < 0.05). DBS was more effective for nociceptive than deafferentation pain (63% vs 47% long-term success; p < 0.01). Long-term success was attained in over 80% of patients with intractable low back pain (failed back surgery) following successful trial stimulation. Trial stimulation was successful in approximately 50% of those with post-stroke pain, and 58% of patients permanently implanted achieved ongoing pain relief. Higher rates of success were seen with phantom limb pain and neuropathies. We conclude that DBS is frequently effective when used in well-selected patients. Neuroimaging and neuromodulation technology advances complicate the application of these results to modern practice. Ongoing investigations should shed further light on this complex clinical conundrum.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: June 2005
Keywords:
deep brain stimulation, pain, failed back surgery, phantom limb pain, pain relief
Organisations:
Human Sciences Group
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 49604
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/49604
ISSN: 0967-5868
PURE UUID: cabbf8da-e7de-4d31-bb95-90ce4efe5a53
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 21 Nov 2007
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 09:57
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
R.G. Bittar
Author:
I. Kar-Purkayastha
Author:
S.L. Owen
Author:
R.E. Bear
Author:
A. Green
Author:
S. Wang
Author:
T.Z. Aziz
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics