The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Heritage of impermanence: decolonising the conservationist paradigm

Heritage of impermanence: decolonising the conservationist paradigm
Heritage of impermanence: decolonising the conservationist paradigm
Modern heritage discourse, essentially its conservationist paraphernalia travelled to India through colonial governance and its establishment of colonial administrative institutions such as ASI (Archaeological Survey of India). In the process, the colonial governance took a paternalistic approach to uncover and teach the ‘natives’ their own history. It advanced the narrative of conservation to recover an ‘ahistorical’ society from its apparent predisposition of forgetting the past (Nandy 1995). The absence of ‘scientistic materialism’ (Winter 2013) in the form of identification, categorisation, documentation and conservation of past objects was marshalled as a lack of historical consciousness, engagement and awareness of the past. Further, the absence of materialist conservation was designated as an inferior form of knowledge rather than a different relationship with the past. Consequently, when the need for conservation as a universal discourse was imported to India it committed certain forms of epistemicide (Santos 2016). Drawing on Santos’ work on Epistemologies of the South, Escobar explains the mechanism of this effacement, ‘what does not exist is actively produced as non-existent or as a noncredible alternative to what exists’ (Escobar 2020, 69). Advancing this argument, I present a counter-hegemonic narrative of heritage sensibility which is lived through the very act of destruction and embedded in the idea of impermanence. This paper essentially challenges the underlying logic of the conservation oriented Eurocentric modernist heritage discourse which is rooted in scientific rationality and ontology of stasis/permanence. Through observation of a craft practice of clay idol-making in Kolkata, I aim to decolonise the ontology of heritage studies and introduce diverse ways of being, knowing, and living in the world which promotes a pluriversal epistemology.
268-273
Mukhopadhyay, Rishika
2e6ce8c9-7ffe-48c4-a5d9-a393c5d2e49e
Denison, Edward
Vawda, Shahid
Mukhopadhyay, Rishika
2e6ce8c9-7ffe-48c4-a5d9-a393c5d2e49e
Denison, Edward
Vawda, Shahid

Mukhopadhyay, Rishika (2022) Heritage of impermanence: decolonising the conservationist paradigm. Denison, Edward and Vawda, Shahid (eds.) In Modern Heritage in the Anthropocene Global Symposium 2022. pp. 268-273 .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Modern heritage discourse, essentially its conservationist paraphernalia travelled to India through colonial governance and its establishment of colonial administrative institutions such as ASI (Archaeological Survey of India). In the process, the colonial governance took a paternalistic approach to uncover and teach the ‘natives’ their own history. It advanced the narrative of conservation to recover an ‘ahistorical’ society from its apparent predisposition of forgetting the past (Nandy 1995). The absence of ‘scientistic materialism’ (Winter 2013) in the form of identification, categorisation, documentation and conservation of past objects was marshalled as a lack of historical consciousness, engagement and awareness of the past. Further, the absence of materialist conservation was designated as an inferior form of knowledge rather than a different relationship with the past. Consequently, when the need for conservation as a universal discourse was imported to India it committed certain forms of epistemicide (Santos 2016). Drawing on Santos’ work on Epistemologies of the South, Escobar explains the mechanism of this effacement, ‘what does not exist is actively produced as non-existent or as a noncredible alternative to what exists’ (Escobar 2020, 69). Advancing this argument, I present a counter-hegemonic narrative of heritage sensibility which is lived through the very act of destruction and embedded in the idea of impermanence. This paper essentially challenges the underlying logic of the conservation oriented Eurocentric modernist heritage discourse which is rooted in scientific rationality and ontology of stasis/permanence. Through observation of a craft practice of clay idol-making in Kolkata, I aim to decolonise the ontology of heritage studies and introduce diverse ways of being, knowing, and living in the world which promotes a pluriversal epistemology.

Text
MoHoA Proceedings 2022 - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: October 2022
Venue - Dates: Modern Heritage in the Anthropocene, UCL, London, 2022-10-26 - 2022-10-28

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 496087
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/496087
PURE UUID: 7321152d-bfac-42d1-a920-61c14a415a36
ORCID for Rishika Mukhopadhyay: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6722-4987

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Dec 2024 17:40
Last modified: 04 Dec 2024 03:19

Export record

Contributors

Author: Rishika Mukhopadhyay ORCID iD
Editor: Edward Denison
Editor: Shahid Vawda

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×