Exploring the impact of online focus group membership on responses: insights from a study on gender and transport
Exploring the impact of online focus group membership on responses: insights from a study on gender and transport
Despite considerable attention in the academic domain, end-users of transport systems are rarely directly asked what they think of gender inequity in transport. Shedding light on this could inform education strategies to address such inequities. This research addresses this research gap, revealing how people think about differences in the way transport systems support (or do not support) the safe and comfortable mobility of men and women. It does so via the use of asynchronous online focus groups, to which 114 people contributed. The research also addresses questions around the impact of focus group gender composition on participants’ responses, an issue not previously considered in online or asynchronous contexts. Results suggest there is broad acceptance of women’s transport disadvantage, with men’s views of women’s experiences largely matching women’s own reports. Women’s views of men’s experiences were less reflective of the male reality. Safety and security were commonly discussed; however, trip complexity and other constraints, driven by differences in care roles taken, were discussed less and therefore represent a potential avenue for education strategies. Group gender composition did impact upon responding, with several of the effects previously found in face-to-face focus group research also manifesting in the anonymous, online context.
Asynchronous online focus groups, transport inequity, focus group gender composition, end-user perspectives
McIlroy, Rich C.
68e56daa-5b0b-477e-a643-3c7b78c1b85d
McPeake, Katie
ee1f7447-5d1a-46ce-bf15-d0bfade92bae
McIlroy, Rich C.
68e56daa-5b0b-477e-a643-3c7b78c1b85d
McPeake, Katie
ee1f7447-5d1a-46ce-bf15-d0bfade92bae
McIlroy, Rich C. and McPeake, Katie
(2024)
Exploring the impact of online focus group membership on responses: insights from a study on gender and transport.
Gender Issues, 42 (1), [1].
(doi:10.1007/s12147-024-09345-5).
Abstract
Despite considerable attention in the academic domain, end-users of transport systems are rarely directly asked what they think of gender inequity in transport. Shedding light on this could inform education strategies to address such inequities. This research addresses this research gap, revealing how people think about differences in the way transport systems support (or do not support) the safe and comfortable mobility of men and women. It does so via the use of asynchronous online focus groups, to which 114 people contributed. The research also addresses questions around the impact of focus group gender composition on participants’ responses, an issue not previously considered in online or asynchronous contexts. Results suggest there is broad acceptance of women’s transport disadvantage, with men’s views of women’s experiences largely matching women’s own reports. Women’s views of men’s experiences were less reflective of the male reality. Safety and security were commonly discussed; however, trip complexity and other constraints, driven by differences in care roles taken, were discussed less and therefore represent a potential avenue for education strategies. Group gender composition did impact upon responding, with several of the effects previously found in face-to-face focus group research also manifesting in the anonymous, online context.
Text
Gender inequity in transport for Pure
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
s12147-024-09345-5 (1)
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 16 October 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 3 November 2024
Keywords:
Asynchronous online focus groups, transport inequity, focus group gender composition, end-user perspectives
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 496089
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/496089
ISSN: 1098-092X
PURE UUID: ae7352c9-2b94-4a4a-94cd-21c2cc8a9fc8
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 Dec 2024 17:43
Last modified: 04 Dec 2024 03:00
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Katie McPeake
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics