Prison work in law and reality: comparative perspectives from Brazil, the UK, and the US
Prison work in law and reality: comparative perspectives from Brazil, the UK, and the US
International law provides that work by sentenced prisoners ought to prepare them for life after release. Yet reliable data on the nature, extent and impacts of prison work is lacking in much of the world, and what there is suggests that much prison work is far from voluntary, is unpaid or poorly paid, is unskilled or low-skilled, and does little to improve employment prospects on release. This article compares how prison work is defined and governed in law and shaped by policy, and how it is organised in practice. It describes the operationalisation of key legal provisions relating to prison work in three countries, and compares the purposes for prison work defined in law, the protections available to working prisoners, and the incentives or penalties used to secure participation. It also summarises the limited data available showing how many prisoners perform which kinds of work in each country. Finally, it argues that efforts to bring prison work provision into closer compliance with international standards should be sensitive to local variation, and suggests clarifying questions which could be used in such a reform process.
Brazil, comparative legal research, human rights, prison labour, Prison work, United Kingdom, United States of America
541-562
Jarman, Ben
17792bef-9b37-408e-b734-acb707842715
Heard, Catherine
0b301b97-2511-4b6b-8b14-b780bfe9ba44
Mantouvalou, Virginia
ff7b2e1c-06af-4c9a-a704-cf87cf2b0e89
1 September 2024
Jarman, Ben
17792bef-9b37-408e-b734-acb707842715
Heard, Catherine
0b301b97-2511-4b6b-8b14-b780bfe9ba44
Mantouvalou, Virginia
ff7b2e1c-06af-4c9a-a704-cf87cf2b0e89
Jarman, Ben and Heard, Catherine
,
Mantouvalou, Virginia
(ed.)
(2024)
Prison work in law and reality: comparative perspectives from Brazil, the UK, and the US.
European Labour Law Journal, 15 (3), .
(doi:10.1177/20319525241263179).
Abstract
International law provides that work by sentenced prisoners ought to prepare them for life after release. Yet reliable data on the nature, extent and impacts of prison work is lacking in much of the world, and what there is suggests that much prison work is far from voluntary, is unpaid or poorly paid, is unskilled or low-skilled, and does little to improve employment prospects on release. This article compares how prison work is defined and governed in law and shaped by policy, and how it is organised in practice. It describes the operationalisation of key legal provisions relating to prison work in three countries, and compares the purposes for prison work defined in law, the protections available to working prisoners, and the incentives or penalties used to secure participation. It also summarises the limited data available showing how many prisoners perform which kinds of work in each country. Finally, it argues that efforts to bring prison work provision into closer compliance with international standards should be sensitive to local variation, and suggests clarifying questions which could be used in such a reform process.
Text
ellj article accepted manuscript
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 17 June 2024
Published date: 1 September 2024
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
Keywords:
Brazil, comparative legal research, human rights, prison labour, Prison work, United Kingdom, United States of America
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 496249
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/496249
ISSN: 2031-9525
PURE UUID: 60f07839-7d17-4a90-882b-89c6bee63ae8
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 Dec 2024 17:31
Last modified: 12 Dec 2024 03:12
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Ben Jarman
Author:
Catherine Heard
Editor:
Virginia Mantouvalou
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics