Working with partial hand prostheses: an investigation into experiences of clinicians
Working with partial hand prostheses: an investigation into experiences of clinicians
Background: individuals living with partial hand absence often face challenges in performing everyday tasks and fully participating in society. Prosthetic devices offer a range of benefits, including improved functionality or cosmesis. However, partial hand devices can be rejected by users. In addition, there is a lack of evidence that establishes methods or factors influencing the clinical prescription of prosthetics specifically designed for this population.
Objectives: the objectives of the investigation were to gain understanding of who is prescribing partial hand prosthetics and the factors which influence device selection.
Study Design: a 36-item anonymous online survey was designed on Qualtrics and distributed to clinicians. The survey contained multiple-choice, Likert-type, closed, and open-ended questions.Methods:Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed on Qualtrics and Microsoft Excel.
Results: thirty-seven clinicians from various occupations participated. The majority agreed that outcome measures are useful for assessing partial hand prosthetics but suggested room for improvement. Although clinicians use various outcome measurement tools, there is a lack of tools specifically tailored to this population. Factors such as existing function, occupation, and hobbies were identified as important when selecting prosthetic devices for users. Funding influenced the range of partial hand devices available for prescription.
Conclusions: the prescription process involves multiple stakeholders. Various factors, including funding and user satisfaction, must be considered in the decision-making process. There is a lack of specific outcome measures recommended for evaluating prosthetics in this population. However, providing loaner units before final prescription yields positive outcomes.
amputation, clinical decision-making, device prescription, partial hand, prosthesis
Carlyle, Kirsty
f0c1d557-7761-4cd5-b12a-8a908af1f7be
Buis, Arjan
c2afa7db-fa3d-4255-9edc-88a57aae3a9c
Donovan-Hall, Maggie
5f138055-2162-4982-846c-5c92411055e0
Day, Sarah
3af2930a-d2cc-436d-8ff6-a2415815f4ad
17 September 2024
Carlyle, Kirsty
f0c1d557-7761-4cd5-b12a-8a908af1f7be
Buis, Arjan
c2afa7db-fa3d-4255-9edc-88a57aae3a9c
Donovan-Hall, Maggie
5f138055-2162-4982-846c-5c92411055e0
Day, Sarah
3af2930a-d2cc-436d-8ff6-a2415815f4ad
Carlyle, Kirsty, Buis, Arjan, Donovan-Hall, Maggie and Day, Sarah
(2024)
Working with partial hand prostheses: an investigation into experiences of clinicians.
Prosthetics and Orthotics International.
(doi:10.1097/PXR.0000000000000371).
Abstract
Background: individuals living with partial hand absence often face challenges in performing everyday tasks and fully participating in society. Prosthetic devices offer a range of benefits, including improved functionality or cosmesis. However, partial hand devices can be rejected by users. In addition, there is a lack of evidence that establishes methods or factors influencing the clinical prescription of prosthetics specifically designed for this population.
Objectives: the objectives of the investigation were to gain understanding of who is prescribing partial hand prosthetics and the factors which influence device selection.
Study Design: a 36-item anonymous online survey was designed on Qualtrics and distributed to clinicians. The survey contained multiple-choice, Likert-type, closed, and open-ended questions.Methods:Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed on Qualtrics and Microsoft Excel.
Results: thirty-seven clinicians from various occupations participated. The majority agreed that outcome measures are useful for assessing partial hand prosthetics but suggested room for improvement. Although clinicians use various outcome measurement tools, there is a lack of tools specifically tailored to this population. Factors such as existing function, occupation, and hobbies were identified as important when selecting prosthetic devices for users. Funding influenced the range of partial hand devices available for prescription.
Conclusions: the prescription process involves multiple stakeholders. Various factors, including funding and user satisfaction, must be considered in the decision-making process. There is a lack of specific outcome measures recommended for evaluating prosthetics in this population. However, providing loaner units before final prescription yields positive outcomes.
Text
AcceptedPaper_Experiences Working With Partial Hand Prosthetics_240924
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 6 May 2024
Published date: 17 September 2024
Keywords:
amputation, clinical decision-making, device prescription, partial hand, prosthesis
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 496266
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/496266
ISSN: 0309-3646
PURE UUID: 0d609ed2-b1d8-472b-b595-b9dd9e56ecb0
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 Dec 2024 17:51
Last modified: 10 Dec 2024 17:51
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Kirsty Carlyle
Author:
Arjan Buis
Author:
Sarah Day
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics