The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) trial: findings from a mixed-methods process evaluation of the Early Stroke Specialist Vocational Rehabilitation (ESSVR) intervention

The RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) trial: findings from a mixed-methods process evaluation of the Early Stroke Specialist Vocational Rehabilitation (ESSVR) intervention
The RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) trial: findings from a mixed-methods process evaluation of the Early Stroke Specialist Vocational Rehabilitation (ESSVR) intervention
Introduction: a key goal for working age stroke survivors is to return to work, yet only around 50% achieve this at 12 months. Currently, there is limited evidence of effectiveness of early stroke-specialist vocational rehabilitation (ESSVR) interventions from randomised controlled trials. This study examined fidelity to ESSVR and explored social and structural factors which may have influenced implementation in the RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) randomised controlled trial.

Methods: mixed-methods process evaluation assessing intervention fidelity and incorporating longitudinal case-studies exploring stroke survivors’ experiences of support to return to work. Normalisation Process Theory, and the Conceptual Model for Implementation Fidelity, informed data collection and analysis.

Results: sixteen sites across England and Wales participated in RETAKE. Forty-eight occupational therapists (OTs), supported by 6 mentors experienced in vocational rehabilitation (VR), delivered the intervention (duration 12 months) between February 2018 and April 2022. Twenty-six participants (15 ESSVR, 11 usual care (UC)) were included in longitudinal case-studies. An additional 18 participants (8 ESSVR and 10 UC) were interviewed once. Nineteen OTs, 6 mentors and 19 service managers were interviewed. Fidelity was measured for 39 ESSVR participants; mean fidelity score was 78.8% (SD:19.2%, range 31-100%). Comparison of the experiences of ESSVR and UC participants indicated duration and type of support to return to work were perceived to be better for ESSVR participants. They received early, co-ordinated support including employer liaison and workplace adjustments where appropriate. In contrast, UC participants reported limited or no VR or return to work support from health professionals. Typically, UC support lasted 2-8 weeks, with poor communication and co-ordination between rehabilitation providers. Mentor support for OTs appeared to increase fidelity. Service managers indicated ESSVR would enhance post-stroke services.

Conclusions: ESSVR was valued by participants and was delivered with fidelity; implementation appeared to be facilitated by mentor support for OTs.
1932-6203
Clarke, David James
f92ad2aa-d6b1-45a7-b1e3-7b2226df79f6
Powers, Katie
a1f27936-b697-40b9-9b84-91b71369e616
Trusson, Diane
4ef46ac2-89bc-4f56-902d-86dd0f39c221
Craven, Kristelle
91df444e-8c32-4aef-8991-d6c9b59bddf0
Phillips, Julie
c4f9a44d-7e83-4fb3-a8a8-8db20dede7c1
Holmes, Jain
c83f15c4-9717-4fb2-87a6-ba71a2d029c1
McKevitt, Christopher
4ff3bb8f-7931-4402-b68d-53aae1cd5570
Bowen, Audrey
feaf6503-6f21-4a8c-a7e4-1259c1f6e381
Watkins, Caroline Leigh
a1c10647-cc4c-4d4d-aeeb-70f00ec810a1
Farrin, Amanda J.
907c9de9-5d02-460e-a409-a1cb8f6bb3da
Wright-Hughes, Alexander
29afcd90-f8e9-41f1-b5ca-65cf1c3ef27e
Sach, Tracey
5c09256f-ebed-4d14-853a-181f6c92d6f2
Chambers, Rachel
ad4ac83a-24c5-4bbf-8de5-dcc81db0c72f
Radford, Kate
5838a2ae-07a9-4bfc-b3f1-b36fd6efe3f2
Clarke, David James
f92ad2aa-d6b1-45a7-b1e3-7b2226df79f6
Powers, Katie
a1f27936-b697-40b9-9b84-91b71369e616
Trusson, Diane
4ef46ac2-89bc-4f56-902d-86dd0f39c221
Craven, Kristelle
91df444e-8c32-4aef-8991-d6c9b59bddf0
Phillips, Julie
c4f9a44d-7e83-4fb3-a8a8-8db20dede7c1
Holmes, Jain
c83f15c4-9717-4fb2-87a6-ba71a2d029c1
McKevitt, Christopher
4ff3bb8f-7931-4402-b68d-53aae1cd5570
Bowen, Audrey
feaf6503-6f21-4a8c-a7e4-1259c1f6e381
Watkins, Caroline Leigh
a1c10647-cc4c-4d4d-aeeb-70f00ec810a1
Farrin, Amanda J.
907c9de9-5d02-460e-a409-a1cb8f6bb3da
Wright-Hughes, Alexander
29afcd90-f8e9-41f1-b5ca-65cf1c3ef27e
Sach, Tracey
5c09256f-ebed-4d14-853a-181f6c92d6f2
Chambers, Rachel
ad4ac83a-24c5-4bbf-8de5-dcc81db0c72f
Radford, Kate
5838a2ae-07a9-4bfc-b3f1-b36fd6efe3f2

Clarke, David James, Powers, Katie, Trusson, Diane, Craven, Kristelle, Phillips, Julie, Holmes, Jain, McKevitt, Christopher, Bowen, Audrey, Watkins, Caroline Leigh, Farrin, Amanda J., Wright-Hughes, Alexander, Sach, Tracey, Chambers, Rachel and Radford, Kate (2024) The RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) trial: findings from a mixed-methods process evaluation of the Early Stroke Specialist Vocational Rehabilitation (ESSVR) intervention. PLoS ONE, 19 (10), [e0311101]. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0311101).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction: a key goal for working age stroke survivors is to return to work, yet only around 50% achieve this at 12 months. Currently, there is limited evidence of effectiveness of early stroke-specialist vocational rehabilitation (ESSVR) interventions from randomised controlled trials. This study examined fidelity to ESSVR and explored social and structural factors which may have influenced implementation in the RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) randomised controlled trial.

Methods: mixed-methods process evaluation assessing intervention fidelity and incorporating longitudinal case-studies exploring stroke survivors’ experiences of support to return to work. Normalisation Process Theory, and the Conceptual Model for Implementation Fidelity, informed data collection and analysis.

Results: sixteen sites across England and Wales participated in RETAKE. Forty-eight occupational therapists (OTs), supported by 6 mentors experienced in vocational rehabilitation (VR), delivered the intervention (duration 12 months) between February 2018 and April 2022. Twenty-six participants (15 ESSVR, 11 usual care (UC)) were included in longitudinal case-studies. An additional 18 participants (8 ESSVR and 10 UC) were interviewed once. Nineteen OTs, 6 mentors and 19 service managers were interviewed. Fidelity was measured for 39 ESSVR participants; mean fidelity score was 78.8% (SD:19.2%, range 31-100%). Comparison of the experiences of ESSVR and UC participants indicated duration and type of support to return to work were perceived to be better for ESSVR participants. They received early, co-ordinated support including employer liaison and workplace adjustments where appropriate. In contrast, UC participants reported limited or no VR or return to work support from health professionals. Typically, UC support lasted 2-8 weeks, with poor communication and co-ordination between rehabilitation providers. Mentor support for OTs appeared to increase fidelity. Service managers indicated ESSVR would enhance post-stroke services.

Conclusions: ESSVR was valued by participants and was delivered with fidelity; implementation appeared to be facilitated by mentor support for OTs.

Text
RETAKE Process Evaluation Final accepted manuscript - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (110kB)
Text
journal.pone.0311101 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 12 September 2024
Published date: 9 October 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 496305
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/496305
ISSN: 1932-6203
PURE UUID: 90567a2e-3e9d-4c90-8e3e-ad3705e9f3e3
ORCID for Tracey Sach: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8098-9220

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Dec 2024 17:38
Last modified: 12 Dec 2024 03:07

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: David James Clarke
Author: Katie Powers
Author: Diane Trusson
Author: Kristelle Craven
Author: Julie Phillips
Author: Jain Holmes
Author: Christopher McKevitt
Author: Audrey Bowen
Author: Caroline Leigh Watkins
Author: Amanda J. Farrin
Author: Alexander Wright-Hughes
Author: Tracey Sach ORCID iD
Author: Rachel Chambers
Author: Kate Radford

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×