Mouse preclinical cancer immunotherapy modeling involving anti-PD-1 therapies reveals the need to use mouse reagents to mirror clinical paradigms
Mouse preclinical cancer immunotherapy modeling involving anti-PD-1 therapies reveals the need to use mouse reagents to mirror clinical paradigms
Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has emerged as one of the most powerful tools to reverse cancer induced immune suppression. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1(PD-1/PD-L1) are FDA-approved and their clinical use is rapidly expanding. As opposed to the clinical paradigm, which can result in significant responses and toxicities, it has been difficult to reproduce these effects preclinically using mouse models. In large part, this is due to models, which employ rapidly growing ex vivo cultured transplantable tumor cell lines engrafted into young naïve inbred laboratory mice. However, another issue concerns the use and repeated application of xenogeneic reagents in mice (i.e., rat or hamster mAbs directed against mouse antigens at variance with clinical use of human or humanized mAbs). Building on our previous studies demonstrating that repeated administration of commonly used xenogeneic anti-PD-1 mAbs derived from both rat and hamster can induce fatal hypersensitivity in some tumor-bearing mice, we sought to compare these result with the effects of a mouse anti-mouse PD-1 mAb. Application of a murine anti-mouse PD-1 (clone: MuDX400) did not result in lethal anaphylaxis in the 4T1 tumor model. It also displayed superior antitumor effects in this and other tumor models, as it did not induce neutralizing antibody responses against the anti-PD-1 mAb, such as were observed when using xenogeneic anti-PD1 mAbs. These results demonstrate that more accurate preclinical modeling necessitates the use of mouse reagents mirroring the clinical scenario to ascertain long-term effects or toxicities, while avoiding xenogeneic responses, which do not occur clinically. Furthermore, these studies suggest a direct mechanism, whereby preclinical murine studies have often failed to recapitulate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of single agent checkpoint inhibition.
Monjazeb, Arta M
904b7fcb-fcfa-49ab-906c-599c4fa7582f
Wang, Ziming
d67e406a-af5b-444c-af42-08dab6d8df28
Vick, Logan V
793cbb3e-8fd9-47a5-922b-45baae4919bb
Dunai, Cordelia
28579a87-d6e5-4ba0-abd3-900e8cdfff98
Minnar, Christine
7976b96f-8695-4c6e-a981-b1623075e333
Khuat, Lam T
ca00b1c8-4f0e-4f61-bb1a-493f120cef8e
Murphy, William J
290fec7b-1d9f-4d5d-80f3-4154fda8970c
10 February 2021
Monjazeb, Arta M
904b7fcb-fcfa-49ab-906c-599c4fa7582f
Wang, Ziming
d67e406a-af5b-444c-af42-08dab6d8df28
Vick, Logan V
793cbb3e-8fd9-47a5-922b-45baae4919bb
Dunai, Cordelia
28579a87-d6e5-4ba0-abd3-900e8cdfff98
Minnar, Christine
7976b96f-8695-4c6e-a981-b1623075e333
Khuat, Lam T
ca00b1c8-4f0e-4f61-bb1a-493f120cef8e
Murphy, William J
290fec7b-1d9f-4d5d-80f3-4154fda8970c
Monjazeb, Arta M, Wang, Ziming, Vick, Logan V, Dunai, Cordelia, Minnar, Christine, Khuat, Lam T and Murphy, William J
(2021)
Mouse preclinical cancer immunotherapy modeling involving anti-PD-1 therapies reveals the need to use mouse reagents to mirror clinical paradigms.
Cancers, 13 (4).
(doi:10.3390/cancers13040729).
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has emerged as one of the most powerful tools to reverse cancer induced immune suppression. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1(PD-1/PD-L1) are FDA-approved and their clinical use is rapidly expanding. As opposed to the clinical paradigm, which can result in significant responses and toxicities, it has been difficult to reproduce these effects preclinically using mouse models. In large part, this is due to models, which employ rapidly growing ex vivo cultured transplantable tumor cell lines engrafted into young naïve inbred laboratory mice. However, another issue concerns the use and repeated application of xenogeneic reagents in mice (i.e., rat or hamster mAbs directed against mouse antigens at variance with clinical use of human or humanized mAbs). Building on our previous studies demonstrating that repeated administration of commonly used xenogeneic anti-PD-1 mAbs derived from both rat and hamster can induce fatal hypersensitivity in some tumor-bearing mice, we sought to compare these result with the effects of a mouse anti-mouse PD-1 mAb. Application of a murine anti-mouse PD-1 (clone: MuDX400) did not result in lethal anaphylaxis in the 4T1 tumor model. It also displayed superior antitumor effects in this and other tumor models, as it did not induce neutralizing antibody responses against the anti-PD-1 mAb, such as were observed when using xenogeneic anti-PD1 mAbs. These results demonstrate that more accurate preclinical modeling necessitates the use of mouse reagents mirroring the clinical scenario to ascertain long-term effects or toxicities, while avoiding xenogeneic responses, which do not occur clinically. Furthermore, these studies suggest a direct mechanism, whereby preclinical murine studies have often failed to recapitulate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of single agent checkpoint inhibition.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 4 February 2021
Published date: 10 February 2021
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 496371
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/496371
ISSN: 2072-6694
PURE UUID: 1fb99ba1-ff48-47a2-bf50-5075fb0b01d5
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Dec 2024 18:02
Last modified: 19 Dec 2024 03:09
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Arta M Monjazeb
Author:
Ziming Wang
Author:
Logan V Vick
Author:
Cordelia Dunai
Author:
Christine Minnar
Author:
Lam T Khuat
Author:
William J Murphy
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics