A randomised crossover trial of five cryocompression devices' ability to reduce skin temperature of the knee
A randomised crossover trial of five cryocompression devices' ability to reduce skin temperature of the knee
Background The application of cold and pressure to the knee is a common part of post-operative rehabilitation. Skin temperature should be reduced to within 10–15 °C to optimise the therapeutic benefits of cryocompression. The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of five different cryocompression devices to reduce skin temperature to within this therapeutic range. Materials and methods 32 healthy adult participants (mean (SD): age 26.3 (7.9) years; BMI 24.8 (2.7) kg/m
2; 20 males) were recruited for this randomised crossover study. Skin temperature was measured 20 mm distal to the patella using a k-type thermocouple every five minutes during a 30-min-ute treatment with one of five different cryocompression devices (Physiolab S1, GameReady, Cryo/Cuff, VPulse, and a Gel Wrap). Changes in skin temperature over time were compared to baseline within and between conditions. A subjective rating of comfort was also recorded for each device. Results The Physiolab S1 and GameReady devices caused significantly lower skin temperatures compared to the VPulse, Gel Wrap, and Cryo/Cuff after 30 minutes (p<0.05). 87–96% reported a positive comfort rating for the Physiolab S1, VPulse, Cryo/Cuff and Gel Wrap, whereas 53% of participants reported a positive comfort rating for the GameReady. Conclusions Only the Physiolab S1 and GameReady devices reduced skin temperature of the knee to within the target range of 10–15 °C. The Physiolab S1 was reportedly more comfortable than the GameReady. Clinicians should be aware of the performance differences of different cryocompression devices to understand which is most likely to provide an effective dose of cold therapy to a joint.
Adult, Cross-Over Studies, Cryotherapy, Humans, Knee Joint, Knee/surgery, Male, Skin Temperature
Belsey, James
e80f02d4-839c-4aef-ad92-f6ab1f861e76
Reid, Andrew
ea470c84-da16-4e54-8363-312a12522f5b
Paine, Eloise
0eaebc3a-0c08-42f3-8cef-ad1a250dd8a3
Faulkner, James
b2bd38c9-667c-42e8-ad1e-6df58d1e3f7a
16 January 2024
Belsey, James
e80f02d4-839c-4aef-ad92-f6ab1f861e76
Reid, Andrew
ea470c84-da16-4e54-8363-312a12522f5b
Paine, Eloise
0eaebc3a-0c08-42f3-8cef-ad1a250dd8a3
Faulkner, James
b2bd38c9-667c-42e8-ad1e-6df58d1e3f7a
Belsey, James, Reid, Andrew, Paine, Eloise and Faulkner, James
(2024)
A randomised crossover trial of five cryocompression devices' ability to reduce skin temperature of the knee.
PLoS ONE, 19 (1 January), [e0296634].
(doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0296634).
Abstract
Background The application of cold and pressure to the knee is a common part of post-operative rehabilitation. Skin temperature should be reduced to within 10–15 °C to optimise the therapeutic benefits of cryocompression. The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of five different cryocompression devices to reduce skin temperature to within this therapeutic range. Materials and methods 32 healthy adult participants (mean (SD): age 26.3 (7.9) years; BMI 24.8 (2.7) kg/m
2; 20 males) were recruited for this randomised crossover study. Skin temperature was measured 20 mm distal to the patella using a k-type thermocouple every five minutes during a 30-min-ute treatment with one of five different cryocompression devices (Physiolab S1, GameReady, Cryo/Cuff, VPulse, and a Gel Wrap). Changes in skin temperature over time were compared to baseline within and between conditions. A subjective rating of comfort was also recorded for each device. Results The Physiolab S1 and GameReady devices caused significantly lower skin temperatures compared to the VPulse, Gel Wrap, and Cryo/Cuff after 30 minutes (p<0.05). 87–96% reported a positive comfort rating for the Physiolab S1, VPulse, Cryo/Cuff and Gel Wrap, whereas 53% of participants reported a positive comfort rating for the GameReady. Conclusions Only the Physiolab S1 and GameReady devices reduced skin temperature of the knee to within the target range of 10–15 °C. The Physiolab S1 was reportedly more comfortable than the GameReady. Clinicians should be aware of the performance differences of different cryocompression devices to understand which is most likely to provide an effective dose of cold therapy to a joint.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 11 December 2023
Published date: 16 January 2024
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Belsey et al.
Keywords:
Adult, Cross-Over Studies, Cryotherapy, Humans, Knee Joint, Knee/surgery, Male, Skin Temperature
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 496613
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/496613
ISSN: 1932-6203
PURE UUID: 91364621-1a32-4c12-acf0-1bc250e9f3b4
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Jan 2025 18:33
Last modified: 08 Aug 2025 02:13
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
James Belsey
Author:
Andrew Reid
Author:
Eloise Paine
Author:
James Faulkner
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics