The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Health literacy and the provision of information to women with breast cancer.

Health literacy and the provision of information to women with breast cancer.
Health literacy and the provision of information to women with breast cancer.
Aims: Health literacy and functional health literacy are important for patients with cancer, as key information regarding treatment complications and clinicaltrials is often imparted using written educational material. This study measured the health literacy and functional health literacy levels in a population ofwomen with breast cancer and compared these with the level of written information provided.Materials and methods: A cross-sectional survey of women with stage I-III breast cancer attending an outpatient clinic was conducted. Health literacy levelswere assessed using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) score and functional health literacy was assessed using three validated screeningquestions. Patient education materials were assessed using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) systems.Results: One hundred and twenty-seven women were recruited. For patients, the mean REALM score was 64.3 (US 9th grade/reading age 14 years). The meanSMOG score of patient education materials was 80.5 (reading age 17 years). The mean FRE score of patient education materials was 55.7 (reading age 15-17years). All patient information sheets assessed were written at 8th grade (reading age 13 years) and as a result up to 9% of patients would be unable to readthem. Nineteen per cent of the population had inadequate functional health literacy.Conclusions: Health literacy levels were high in the population studied. However, the reading level of written patient information was also high, meaning thatup to 9% of patients would be unable to read the information provided. Functional health literacy levels were lower, with 19% of patients having inadequateability. This means that although most patients are able read the information sheets provided, there is a larger proportion that would be unable to understandand act upon this information. Patient education materials should be written at an appropriate level and different modalities of communication should be usedto ensure adequate comprehension.
0936-6555
223 - 227
Cox, N.
dfdfbc5f-41b8-4329-a4b5-87b6e93aa09e
Bowmer, C.
ae917acb-bf28-4a96-b4b2-2023a37c9f40
Ring, A.
94c4eca4-5896-4af8-9686-be343647223f
Cox, N.
dfdfbc5f-41b8-4329-a4b5-87b6e93aa09e
Bowmer, C.
ae917acb-bf28-4a96-b4b2-2023a37c9f40
Ring, A.
94c4eca4-5896-4af8-9686-be343647223f

Cox, N., Bowmer, C. and Ring, A. (2010) Health literacy and the provision of information to women with breast cancer. Clinical Oncology, 23 (3), 223 - 227. (doi:10.1016/j.clon.2010.11.010).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Aims: Health literacy and functional health literacy are important for patients with cancer, as key information regarding treatment complications and clinicaltrials is often imparted using written educational material. This study measured the health literacy and functional health literacy levels in a population ofwomen with breast cancer and compared these with the level of written information provided.Materials and methods: A cross-sectional survey of women with stage I-III breast cancer attending an outpatient clinic was conducted. Health literacy levelswere assessed using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) score and functional health literacy was assessed using three validated screeningquestions. Patient education materials were assessed using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) systems.Results: One hundred and twenty-seven women were recruited. For patients, the mean REALM score was 64.3 (US 9th grade/reading age 14 years). The meanSMOG score of patient education materials was 80.5 (reading age 17 years). The mean FRE score of patient education materials was 55.7 (reading age 15-17years). All patient information sheets assessed were written at 8th grade (reading age 13 years) and as a result up to 9% of patients would be unable to readthem. Nineteen per cent of the population had inadequate functional health literacy.Conclusions: Health literacy levels were high in the population studied. However, the reading level of written patient information was also high, meaning thatup to 9% of patients would be unable to read the information provided. Functional health literacy levels were lower, with 19% of patients having inadequateability. This means that although most patients are able read the information sheets provided, there is a larger proportion that would be unable to understandand act upon this information. Patient education materials should be written at an appropriate level and different modalities of communication should be usedto ensure adequate comprehension.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 16 November 2010
Published date: 27 December 2010

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 496619
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/496619
ISSN: 0936-6555
PURE UUID: 3573bf7e-b467-4d5c-99c5-14beed832c01
ORCID for N. Cox: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4297-1206

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Jan 2025 18:38
Last modified: 10 Jan 2025 03:18

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: N. Cox ORCID iD
Author: C. Bowmer
Author: A. Ring

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×