Health literacy and the provision of information to women with breast cancer.
Health literacy and the provision of information to women with breast cancer.
Aims: Health literacy and functional health literacy are important for patients with cancer, as key information regarding treatment complications and clinicaltrials is often imparted using written educational material. This study measured the health literacy and functional health literacy levels in a population ofwomen with breast cancer and compared these with the level of written information provided.Materials and methods: A cross-sectional survey of women with stage I-III breast cancer attending an outpatient clinic was conducted. Health literacy levelswere assessed using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) score and functional health literacy was assessed using three validated screeningquestions. Patient education materials were assessed using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) systems.Results: One hundred and twenty-seven women were recruited. For patients, the mean REALM score was 64.3 (US 9th grade/reading age 14 years). The meanSMOG score of patient education materials was 80.5 (reading age 17 years). The mean FRE score of patient education materials was 55.7 (reading age 15-17years). All patient information sheets assessed were written at 8th grade (reading age 13 years) and as a result up to 9% of patients would be unable to readthem. Nineteen per cent of the population had inadequate functional health literacy.Conclusions: Health literacy levels were high in the population studied. However, the reading level of written patient information was also high, meaning thatup to 9% of patients would be unable to read the information provided. Functional health literacy levels were lower, with 19% of patients having inadequateability. This means that although most patients are able read the information sheets provided, there is a larger proportion that would be unable to understandand act upon this information. Patient education materials should be written at an appropriate level and different modalities of communication should be usedto ensure adequate comprehension.
223 - 227
Cox, N.
dfdfbc5f-41b8-4329-a4b5-87b6e93aa09e
Bowmer, C.
ae917acb-bf28-4a96-b4b2-2023a37c9f40
Ring, A.
94c4eca4-5896-4af8-9686-be343647223f
27 December 2010
Cox, N.
dfdfbc5f-41b8-4329-a4b5-87b6e93aa09e
Bowmer, C.
ae917acb-bf28-4a96-b4b2-2023a37c9f40
Ring, A.
94c4eca4-5896-4af8-9686-be343647223f
Cox, N., Bowmer, C. and Ring, A.
(2010)
Health literacy and the provision of information to women with breast cancer.
Clinical Oncology, 23 (3), .
(doi:10.1016/j.clon.2010.11.010).
Abstract
Aims: Health literacy and functional health literacy are important for patients with cancer, as key information regarding treatment complications and clinicaltrials is often imparted using written educational material. This study measured the health literacy and functional health literacy levels in a population ofwomen with breast cancer and compared these with the level of written information provided.Materials and methods: A cross-sectional survey of women with stage I-III breast cancer attending an outpatient clinic was conducted. Health literacy levelswere assessed using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) score and functional health literacy was assessed using three validated screeningquestions. Patient education materials were assessed using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) systems.Results: One hundred and twenty-seven women were recruited. For patients, the mean REALM score was 64.3 (US 9th grade/reading age 14 years). The meanSMOG score of patient education materials was 80.5 (reading age 17 years). The mean FRE score of patient education materials was 55.7 (reading age 15-17years). All patient information sheets assessed were written at 8th grade (reading age 13 years) and as a result up to 9% of patients would be unable to readthem. Nineteen per cent of the population had inadequate functional health literacy.Conclusions: Health literacy levels were high in the population studied. However, the reading level of written patient information was also high, meaning thatup to 9% of patients would be unable to read the information provided. Functional health literacy levels were lower, with 19% of patients having inadequateability. This means that although most patients are able read the information sheets provided, there is a larger proportion that would be unable to understandand act upon this information. Patient education materials should be written at an appropriate level and different modalities of communication should be usedto ensure adequate comprehension.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 16 November 2010
Published date: 27 December 2010
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 496619
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/496619
ISSN: 0936-6555
PURE UUID: 3573bf7e-b467-4d5c-99c5-14beed832c01
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Jan 2025 18:38
Last modified: 10 Jan 2025 03:18
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
N. Cox
Author:
C. Bowmer
Author:
A. Ring
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics