The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Available evidence suggests that prevalence and risk of female genital cutting/mutilation in the UK is much lower than widely presumed - policies based on exaggerated estimates are harmful to girls and women from affected communities

Available evidence suggests that prevalence and risk of female genital cutting/mutilation in the UK is much lower than widely presumed - policies based on exaggerated estimates are harmful to girls and women from affected communities
Available evidence suggests that prevalence and risk of female genital cutting/mutilation in the UK is much lower than widely presumed - policies based on exaggerated estimates are harmful to girls and women from affected communities
It is widely reported that ‘tens of thousands of girls’ are living in the UK with the risk of experiencing Female Genital Cutting or Mutilation (FGC/M). This paper reviews the data on which such claims are based. It finds that the data available with which to establish the scale of such risk is both sparse and problematic, and that the numbers claimed to be at risk are considerably over-inflated. For example, data collected by the National Health Service suggests that as few as eight girls had FGC/M while resident in the UK since their records began, with as few as one or two experiencing FGC/M types 1, 2 or 3. Other data publicly available or retrieved from Freedom of Information requests to the Home Office, Crown Prosecution Service, Ministry of Justice, Department for Education, National Health Service and academic sources also suggest that the ‘tens of thousands of girls’ claim is misplaced. Current UK FGM-safeguarding approaches, though well-intentioned, appear to be based on inaccurate estimates of FGC/M prevalence and risk. Existing research shows that these approaches directly harm communities, contributing to institutional discrimination, racially/religiously-motivated victimisation and the criminalisation of innocent families. This is an issue which must be urgently addressed.
0955-9930
Karlsen, Saffron
34b0633b-d4a4-4ada-a20a-838327ec9c88
Howard, Janet
572dced2-4f57-4cb9-ab70-8a6a23b87f31
Carver, Natasha
6fe50d7b-ed6d-4865-8810-29fda60c1983
Mogilnicka, Magda
99b42ae0-17cf-4b08-9962-4ab607e58b13
Pantazis, Christina
c642655a-80b3-4e42-93a4-ea4ac204bf3b
Karlsen, Saffron
34b0633b-d4a4-4ada-a20a-838327ec9c88
Howard, Janet
572dced2-4f57-4cb9-ab70-8a6a23b87f31
Carver, Natasha
6fe50d7b-ed6d-4865-8810-29fda60c1983
Mogilnicka, Magda
99b42ae0-17cf-4b08-9962-4ab607e58b13
Pantazis, Christina
c642655a-80b3-4e42-93a4-ea4ac204bf3b

Karlsen, Saffron, Howard, Janet, Carver, Natasha, Mogilnicka, Magda and Pantazis, Christina (2022) Available evidence suggests that prevalence and risk of female genital cutting/mutilation in the UK is much lower than widely presumed - policies based on exaggerated estimates are harmful to girls and women from affected communities. International Journal of Body Composition Researech. (doi:10.1038/s41443-021-00526-4).

Record type: Article

Abstract

It is widely reported that ‘tens of thousands of girls’ are living in the UK with the risk of experiencing Female Genital Cutting or Mutilation (FGC/M). This paper reviews the data on which such claims are based. It finds that the data available with which to establish the scale of such risk is both sparse and problematic, and that the numbers claimed to be at risk are considerably over-inflated. For example, data collected by the National Health Service suggests that as few as eight girls had FGC/M while resident in the UK since their records began, with as few as one or two experiencing FGC/M types 1, 2 or 3. Other data publicly available or retrieved from Freedom of Information requests to the Home Office, Crown Prosecution Service, Ministry of Justice, Department for Education, National Health Service and academic sources also suggest that the ‘tens of thousands of girls’ claim is misplaced. Current UK FGM-safeguarding approaches, though well-intentioned, appear to be based on inaccurate estimates of FGC/M prevalence and risk. Existing research shows that these approaches directly harm communities, contributing to institutional discrimination, racially/religiously-motivated victimisation and the criminalisation of innocent families. This is an issue which must be urgently addressed.

Text
s41443-021-00526-4 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (365kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 21 December 2021
Published date: 15 January 2022
Additional Information: Funding Information: This research was supported by the Elizabeth Blackwell Institute, University of Bristol, and funded in whole, or in part, by the Wellcome Trust [Grant number - R100128-117]. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any author accepted manuscript version arising from this submission.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 496674
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/496674
ISSN: 0955-9930
PURE UUID: c3f78e38-e173-4af3-bc86-1e3359c93f56
ORCID for Magda Mogilnicka: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1258-5731

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Jan 2025 19:08
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:45

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Saffron Karlsen
Author: Janet Howard
Author: Natasha Carver
Author: Magda Mogilnicka ORCID iD
Author: Christina Pantazis

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×