Capturing and reporting topical treatment use in childhood eczema: lessons for data collection in eczema trials
Capturing and reporting topical treatment use in childhood eczema: lessons for data collection in eczema trials
Background
Emollients and topical corticosteroids (TCS) prevent and treat flares in eczema. However, topical treatment use is poorly recorded and reported in clinical trials. There is no clear consensus of how best to capture and summarize topical treatment use.
Objectives
To explore different ways of capturing and reporting topical treatment use in childhood eczema.
Methods
This was a secondary data analysis using 450 participants from the Best Emollients for Eczema (BEE) trial. Participants were allocated to use one type of emollient (lotion, cream, gel or ointment) ‘twice daily and when required’ for 16 weeks. Otherwise, clinical management remained unchanged. Parents completed weekly questions about topical therapy use and eczema symptoms. Two versions of topical treatment use questionnaires were used. The first (n = 202, 44.9%) asked parents to report treatment use on days 1–7, starting completion on the day they were randomized. The second (n = 248, 55.1%) reported use by day of the week (Monday to Sunday), starting completion the first Monday after randomization. Both underwent patient and public involvement review but the second version was tested more thoroughly using cognitive interviewing techniques, following parent feedback that questions on the first version were confusing. Descriptive statistics compared questionnaire completion and differences in emollient and TCS use.
Results
Overall, questionnaire completion for both emollient and TCS use decreased with time, but at weeks 1 and 16, it was 84.7% (381/450) and 58.9% (265/450) for emollient use, and 94.2% (424/450) and 80.4% (362/450) for TCS use, respectively. Fewer emollient use questionnaires were completed with the first (33.5%, 1082/3232 patient-weeks) than the second (87.9%, 3489/3968 patient-weeks) version (P < 0.001). TCS use questionnaire completion were similar for both (84.9%, 2744/3232 patient-weeks and 87.4%, 3468/3968 patient-weeks, P = 0.002). We present different ways of summarizing topical treatment use.
Conclusions
Although questionnaire completion was similar for TCS use, emollient-use data completeness was higher in the second version. When designing questionnaires, balancing the detail and complexity of questions is important, especially if being collected as a secondary outcome measure. Numerous ways of summarizing the same data can provide different information. Future collection and reporting of treatment use should reflect specific trial aims.
580-589
Memory, Katherine E.
dc9608b7-cf3d-497c-8d4b-4320df10486b
Macneill, Stephanie J.
2c5c4027-4f93-4cc8-a56c-fa85772f3a09
Thomas, Kim
9d3742f0-c4fc-4d43-9255-3f854ebf134d
Santer, Miriam
3ce7e832-31eb-4d27-9876-3a1cd7f381dc
Ridd, Matthew
2f15120c-d5fa-4f5d-bb86-21356e034df7
18 August 2024
Memory, Katherine E.
dc9608b7-cf3d-497c-8d4b-4320df10486b
Macneill, Stephanie J.
2c5c4027-4f93-4cc8-a56c-fa85772f3a09
Thomas, Kim
9d3742f0-c4fc-4d43-9255-3f854ebf134d
Santer, Miriam
3ce7e832-31eb-4d27-9876-3a1cd7f381dc
Ridd, Matthew
2f15120c-d5fa-4f5d-bb86-21356e034df7
Memory, Katherine E., Macneill, Stephanie J., Thomas, Kim, Santer, Miriam and Ridd, Matthew
(2024)
Capturing and reporting topical treatment use in childhood eczema: lessons for data collection in eczema trials.
Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, 50 (3), .
(doi:10.1093/ced/llae328).
Abstract
Background
Emollients and topical corticosteroids (TCS) prevent and treat flares in eczema. However, topical treatment use is poorly recorded and reported in clinical trials. There is no clear consensus of how best to capture and summarize topical treatment use.
Objectives
To explore different ways of capturing and reporting topical treatment use in childhood eczema.
Methods
This was a secondary data analysis using 450 participants from the Best Emollients for Eczema (BEE) trial. Participants were allocated to use one type of emollient (lotion, cream, gel or ointment) ‘twice daily and when required’ for 16 weeks. Otherwise, clinical management remained unchanged. Parents completed weekly questions about topical therapy use and eczema symptoms. Two versions of topical treatment use questionnaires were used. The first (n = 202, 44.9%) asked parents to report treatment use on days 1–7, starting completion on the day they were randomized. The second (n = 248, 55.1%) reported use by day of the week (Monday to Sunday), starting completion the first Monday after randomization. Both underwent patient and public involvement review but the second version was tested more thoroughly using cognitive interviewing techniques, following parent feedback that questions on the first version were confusing. Descriptive statistics compared questionnaire completion and differences in emollient and TCS use.
Results
Overall, questionnaire completion for both emollient and TCS use decreased with time, but at weeks 1 and 16, it was 84.7% (381/450) and 58.9% (265/450) for emollient use, and 94.2% (424/450) and 80.4% (362/450) for TCS use, respectively. Fewer emollient use questionnaires were completed with the first (33.5%, 1082/3232 patient-weeks) than the second (87.9%, 3489/3968 patient-weeks) version (P < 0.001). TCS use questionnaire completion were similar for both (84.9%, 2744/3232 patient-weeks and 87.4%, 3468/3968 patient-weeks, P = 0.002). We present different ways of summarizing topical treatment use.
Conclusions
Although questionnaire completion was similar for TCS use, emollient-use data completeness was higher in the second version. When designing questionnaires, balancing the detail and complexity of questions is important, especially if being collected as a secondary outcome measure. Numerous ways of summarizing the same data can provide different information. Future collection and reporting of treatment use should reflect specific trial aims.
Text
llae328
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 16 August 2024
Published date: 18 August 2024
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 496731
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/496731
ISSN: 0307-6938
PURE UUID: 38b9d20c-9b8b-47d0-8f5c-dec400fd6799
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Jan 2025 22:10
Last modified: 19 Nov 2025 02:43
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Katherine E. Memory
Author:
Stephanie J. Macneill
Author:
Kim Thomas
Author:
Matthew Ridd
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics