Optimization of waste heat utilization in oil field development employing a transcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for electricity generation
Optimization of waste heat utilization in oil field development employing a transcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for electricity generation
This study describes the low temperature waste heat exploitation during enhanced crude oil development providing a 600–900 kW continuous electric power supply under deteriorating and oscillating thermal boundary conditions. The aim of this project was to optimize the heat-to-power conversion process by maximizing the net power output employing a transcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) with R134a as working fluid. Volatile supercritical thermo-physical fluid properties demand a review of heat transfer and expansion procedures. In order to design a comprehensive and dynamic unit configuration, a flexible cycle layout with an adjustable working fluid mass flow is required. The optimization developed a positive heat exchange/pressure correlation for the net power output with reasonable cycle efficiencies of around 10% employing moderate device sizes. Changing ambient temperatures from a winter night with 10 °C to a summer day with 28 °C ambient temperature, on the US West Coast, leads to net power differences of up to 200 kW for an identical cycle configuration. Positive and negative effects result from these temperature oscillations while the heat sink temperature decreases, as does the bottom pressure. Extended available temperature and pressure differences lead to higher power outputs and cycle efficiencies. Considering higher ambient temperatures, the efficiency and power increase per heat transfer performance increase is higher than at low ambient temperatures. For this reason a “large” heat exchanger is more beneficial under warm ambient conditions than under cold ones. In addition, “large” configurations do not easily run the risk of subcritical cycle operation unlike small configurations. It is therefore important to examine the ORC machine performance over a full range of ambients. Considering a likelihood of heat source temperature degradation, an aggressive cycle design does not pay off. The selection of larger heat transfer devices almost equalizes the net power output compared to smaller ones after a heat source temperature deterioration of ∼ 6 K. Sensitivity analyses in the way presented here are an indispensable tool for achieving optimal cycle layout and operation.
363-369
Zabek, Daniel
7281d29f-829d-4f54-89a2-ee4f48a357af
Penton, John
4ccb4662-9b88-401c-8a65-59ce6c702a89
Reay, David
18d6b5ff-65d7-4ea7-a9b6-7e21841b0c1b
Zabek, Daniel
7281d29f-829d-4f54-89a2-ee4f48a357af
Penton, John
4ccb4662-9b88-401c-8a65-59ce6c702a89
Reay, David
18d6b5ff-65d7-4ea7-a9b6-7e21841b0c1b
Zabek, Daniel, Penton, John and Reay, David
(2013)
Optimization of waste heat utilization in oil field development employing a transcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for electricity generation.
Applied Thermal Engineering, 59 (1-2), .
(doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.06.001).
Abstract
This study describes the low temperature waste heat exploitation during enhanced crude oil development providing a 600–900 kW continuous electric power supply under deteriorating and oscillating thermal boundary conditions. The aim of this project was to optimize the heat-to-power conversion process by maximizing the net power output employing a transcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) with R134a as working fluid. Volatile supercritical thermo-physical fluid properties demand a review of heat transfer and expansion procedures. In order to design a comprehensive and dynamic unit configuration, a flexible cycle layout with an adjustable working fluid mass flow is required. The optimization developed a positive heat exchange/pressure correlation for the net power output with reasonable cycle efficiencies of around 10% employing moderate device sizes. Changing ambient temperatures from a winter night with 10 °C to a summer day with 28 °C ambient temperature, on the US West Coast, leads to net power differences of up to 200 kW for an identical cycle configuration. Positive and negative effects result from these temperature oscillations while the heat sink temperature decreases, as does the bottom pressure. Extended available temperature and pressure differences lead to higher power outputs and cycle efficiencies. Considering higher ambient temperatures, the efficiency and power increase per heat transfer performance increase is higher than at low ambient temperatures. For this reason a “large” heat exchanger is more beneficial under warm ambient conditions than under cold ones. In addition, “large” configurations do not easily run the risk of subcritical cycle operation unlike small configurations. It is therefore important to examine the ORC machine performance over a full range of ambients. Considering a likelihood of heat source temperature degradation, an aggressive cycle design does not pay off. The selection of larger heat transfer devices almost equalizes the net power output compared to smaller ones after a heat source temperature deterioration of ∼ 6 K. Sensitivity analyses in the way presented here are an indispensable tool for achieving optimal cycle layout and operation.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 1 June 2013
e-pub ahead of print date: 11 June 2013
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 496757
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/496757
ISSN: 1359-4311
PURE UUID: f46815dd-a8fc-4f4e-b02b-bfff1f2d3f1e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Jan 2025 23:14
Last modified: 10 Jan 2025 03:21
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Daniel Zabek
Author:
John Penton
Author:
David Reay
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics