Models of Venus Atmosphere
Models of Venus Atmosphere
In the context of an International Space Science Institute(ISSI) working group, we have conducted a project to compare the most recent General Circulation Models (GCMs) of the Venus atmospheric circulation. A common configuration has been decided, with simple physical parametrization for the solar forcing and the boundary layer scheme. Six models have been used in this intercomparison project. The nominal simulation was run for more than 200 Venus days, and additional sensitivity runs have been done by several models to test the trends visible in these models when parameters are varied: topography, upper and lower boundary conditions, horizontal and vertical resolution, initial conditions. The results show that even in very similar modelling conditions, the wind speeds obtained with the different GCMs are widely different. Superrotation is obtained, but the shape (with or without marked high-latitude jets) and amplitude of the maximum zonal wind jet is different from one model to the other, from 15 to 50 m/s. Minor sensitivity is seen in several models to the upper boundary conditions, the topography or the vertical grid. Horizontal resolution and lower boundary conditions induce variations that are significant, affecting the amplitude and shape of the region of maximum zonal wind. Two models were started from an atmosphere already in superrotation. The simulations did not converge back to the nominal simulations, maintaining maximum zonal winds over 70 m/s (and even 100 m/s) without marked high-latitude jets. This study shows how sensitive GCMs are to the weak forcing of Venus atmosphere, and how difficult it is to draw precise conclusions on the circulation obtained with a single model, as well as on its sensitivity to some parameters.
129-156
Lebonnois, Sebastien
b94c86d1-b894-490c-aafd-cd072bf96e3d
Lee, Christopher
f37cd28b-9244-4ed5-8fee-53848c8edda8
Yamamoto, Masaru
72bdb2b9-9829-4386-ab7d-24c64d7074a4
Dawson, Jonathan
31c94260-7058-4190-9ae4-2d56a56539ac
Lewis, Stephen R.
c6731362-ff40-4921-81ac-de6ae053589e
Mendonca, Joao
cb29fe08-eb94-4fad-8eba-eac1c5de491b
Read, Peter
0c70516f-56ef-4f86-91e7-c55f9b49d8ba
Parish, Helen F.
9eacc4dc-13e7-4a00-a95b-3925733ee03a
Schubert, Gerald
856711c2-8d12-447e-9b79-0a8e046a9122
Bengtsson, Lennart
ba55ec8e-60e0-4283-8f24-67dd80db77ad
Grinspoon, David
534f6863-a3a5-441e-8af8-20a21f08de39
Limaye, Sanjay S.
cefdf44c-bb3f-4441-90f4-44f4fe4607f6
Schmidt, Hauke
8a860178-1e75-498c-b9dd-67c7104e57c2
Svedhem, H̊akan
f5e82036-eb95-4604-ae7b-e55f541817fd
Titov, Dimitri V.
60db20f0-25d9-4e64-9d3a-e6c19f854e73
Bengtsson, Lennart
4b27c5a6-958b-4493-958f-896472c87fb4
Bonnet, Roger-Maurice
29f4c0ea-a703-49af-a2e7-a7c362073edb
Grinspoon, David
0d290cf8-9b14-444c-886d-d393f303b690
Koumoutsaris, Symeon
6a0906e2-c726-4032-adda-a525d185400c
Lebonnois, Sebastien
c460bf8c-3b15-4ef5-9135-cbceb55fe4e4
Titov, Dmitri
37231ba3-10fb-4c6b-94f0-6f4436541f3c
2013
Lebonnois, Sebastien
b94c86d1-b894-490c-aafd-cd072bf96e3d
Lee, Christopher
f37cd28b-9244-4ed5-8fee-53848c8edda8
Yamamoto, Masaru
72bdb2b9-9829-4386-ab7d-24c64d7074a4
Dawson, Jonathan
31c94260-7058-4190-9ae4-2d56a56539ac
Lewis, Stephen R.
c6731362-ff40-4921-81ac-de6ae053589e
Mendonca, Joao
cb29fe08-eb94-4fad-8eba-eac1c5de491b
Read, Peter
0c70516f-56ef-4f86-91e7-c55f9b49d8ba
Parish, Helen F.
9eacc4dc-13e7-4a00-a95b-3925733ee03a
Schubert, Gerald
856711c2-8d12-447e-9b79-0a8e046a9122
Bengtsson, Lennart
ba55ec8e-60e0-4283-8f24-67dd80db77ad
Grinspoon, David
534f6863-a3a5-441e-8af8-20a21f08de39
Limaye, Sanjay S.
cefdf44c-bb3f-4441-90f4-44f4fe4607f6
Schmidt, Hauke
8a860178-1e75-498c-b9dd-67c7104e57c2
Svedhem, H̊akan
f5e82036-eb95-4604-ae7b-e55f541817fd
Titov, Dimitri V.
60db20f0-25d9-4e64-9d3a-e6c19f854e73
Bengtsson, Lennart
4b27c5a6-958b-4493-958f-896472c87fb4
Bonnet, Roger-Maurice
29f4c0ea-a703-49af-a2e7-a7c362073edb
Grinspoon, David
0d290cf8-9b14-444c-886d-d393f303b690
Koumoutsaris, Symeon
6a0906e2-c726-4032-adda-a525d185400c
Lebonnois, Sebastien
c460bf8c-3b15-4ef5-9135-cbceb55fe4e4
Titov, Dmitri
37231ba3-10fb-4c6b-94f0-6f4436541f3c
Lebonnois, Sebastien, Lee, Christopher, Yamamoto, Masaru, Dawson, Jonathan, Lewis, Stephen R., Mendonca, Joao, Read, Peter, Parish, Helen F., Schubert, Gerald, Bengtsson, Lennart, Grinspoon, David, Limaye, Sanjay S., Schmidt, Hauke, Svedhem, H̊akan and Titov, Dimitri V.
(2013)
Models of Venus Atmosphere.
In,
Bengtsson, Lennart, Bonnet, Roger-Maurice, Grinspoon, David, Koumoutsaris, Symeon, Lebonnois, Sebastien, Titov, Dmitri, Bengtsson, Lennart, Bonnet, Roger-Maurice, Grinspoon, David, Koumoutsaris, Symeon, Lebonnois, Sebastien and Titov, Dmitri
(eds.)
Towards Understanding the Climate of Venus: Application of Terrestrial Models to Our Sister Planet.
(ISSI Scientific Report, 11)
New York.
Springer Publishing, .
(doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5064-1_8).
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
In the context of an International Space Science Institute(ISSI) working group, we have conducted a project to compare the most recent General Circulation Models (GCMs) of the Venus atmospheric circulation. A common configuration has been decided, with simple physical parametrization for the solar forcing and the boundary layer scheme. Six models have been used in this intercomparison project. The nominal simulation was run for more than 200 Venus days, and additional sensitivity runs have been done by several models to test the trends visible in these models when parameters are varied: topography, upper and lower boundary conditions, horizontal and vertical resolution, initial conditions. The results show that even in very similar modelling conditions, the wind speeds obtained with the different GCMs are widely different. Superrotation is obtained, but the shape (with or without marked high-latitude jets) and amplitude of the maximum zonal wind jet is different from one model to the other, from 15 to 50 m/s. Minor sensitivity is seen in several models to the upper boundary conditions, the topography or the vertical grid. Horizontal resolution and lower boundary conditions induce variations that are significant, affecting the amplitude and shape of the region of maximum zonal wind. Two models were started from an atmosphere already in superrotation. The simulations did not converge back to the nominal simulations, maintaining maximum zonal winds over 70 m/s (and even 100 m/s) without marked high-latitude jets. This study shows how sensitive GCMs are to the weak forcing of Venus atmosphere, and how difficult it is to draw precise conclusions on the circulation obtained with a single model, as well as on its sensitivity to some parameters.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2013
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 496779
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/496779
PURE UUID: 05fd4887-ec64-45e9-908f-c9691a4bc07f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 08 Jan 2025 05:22
Last modified: 10 Jan 2025 03:21
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Sebastien Lebonnois
Author:
Christopher Lee
Author:
Masaru Yamamoto
Author:
Jonathan Dawson
Author:
Stephen R. Lewis
Author:
Joao Mendonca
Author:
Peter Read
Author:
Helen F. Parish
Author:
Gerald Schubert
Author:
Lennart Bengtsson
Author:
David Grinspoon
Author:
Sanjay S. Limaye
Author:
Hauke Schmidt
Author:
H̊akan Svedhem
Author:
Dimitri V. Titov
Editor:
Lennart Bengtsson
Editor:
Roger-Maurice Bonnet
Editor:
David Grinspoon
Editor:
Symeon Koumoutsaris
Editor:
Sebastien Lebonnois
Editor:
Dmitri Titov
Editor:
Lennart Bengtsson
Editor:
Roger-Maurice Bonnet
Editor:
David Grinspoon
Editor:
Symeon Koumoutsaris
Editor:
Sebastien Lebonnois
Editor:
Dmitri Titov
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics