Grazing by Calanus helgolandicus and Para-Pseudocalanus spp. on phytoplankton and protozooplankton during the spring bloom in the Celtic Sea
Grazing by Calanus helgolandicus and Para-Pseudocalanus spp. on phytoplankton and protozooplankton during the spring bloom in the Celtic Sea
Feeding rates and selectivity of the calanoid copepods Calanus helgolandicus and Para-Pseudocalanus spp. on natural assemblages of microplankton were evaluated in the English Channel and western Celtic Sea during non-bloom and bloom conditions in April 2002. Ingestion rates of total chlorophyll-a were low at non-bloom stations where the phytoplankton community was dominated by cells < 5 ?m in length and higher during the bloom when the > 5 ?m size fraction was dominant. Protozooplankton contributed to the copepod diet in all experiments, C. helgolandicus clearance and ingestion rates were highest for the ciliate Myrionecta rubra (626–1347 ml cop? 1 d? 1; 0.3–27 ?g C cop? 1 d? 1). C. helgolandicus ingested between 1 and 18 ?g C cop? 1 d? 1 (1–12% body C) from phytoplankton + protozooplankton food sources. The total carbon ingested by Para-Pseudocalanus spp. was lower (0.5–6 ?g cop? 1 d? 1) but this was equivalent to between 6 and 78% of body carbon being ingested daily. Our data suggest that C. helgolandicus selected prey according to size; this was not the case for Para-Pseudocalanus spp. which became more selective as chlorophyll-a concentration increased. Grazing impact of the entire copepod community on protozooplankton was assessed. We found that at non-bloom stations between 12 and 17% of the protozooplankton community was being removed daily by the copepod community, whereas during the peak of the bloom the proportion being removed daily was only 2%. We conclude that during the spring bloom period copepods gained the majority of their carbon from phytoplankton ingestion but during non-bloom periods, protozooplankton and the ciliate M. rubra made a significant contribution to copepod diet.
Calanus helgolandicus, Chlorophyll-a, Ingestion, Para-Pseudocalanus spp., Prey preference, Protozooplankton
70-84
Fileman, E.
8ab65ef1-7d04-46b6-8653-c93b8148fb29
Smith, T.
8af789d2-e097-40af-9632-514501c3c2f1
Harris, R.
c31eff12-c624-49cb-88fe-19ad742b8e8d
7 September 2007
Fileman, E.
8ab65ef1-7d04-46b6-8653-c93b8148fb29
Smith, T.
8af789d2-e097-40af-9632-514501c3c2f1
Harris, R.
c31eff12-c624-49cb-88fe-19ad742b8e8d
Fileman, E., Smith, T. and Harris, R.
(2007)
Grazing by Calanus helgolandicus and Para-Pseudocalanus spp. on phytoplankton and protozooplankton during the spring bloom in the Celtic Sea.
Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 348 (1-2), .
(doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2007.04.003).
Abstract
Feeding rates and selectivity of the calanoid copepods Calanus helgolandicus and Para-Pseudocalanus spp. on natural assemblages of microplankton were evaluated in the English Channel and western Celtic Sea during non-bloom and bloom conditions in April 2002. Ingestion rates of total chlorophyll-a were low at non-bloom stations where the phytoplankton community was dominated by cells < 5 ?m in length and higher during the bloom when the > 5 ?m size fraction was dominant. Protozooplankton contributed to the copepod diet in all experiments, C. helgolandicus clearance and ingestion rates were highest for the ciliate Myrionecta rubra (626–1347 ml cop? 1 d? 1; 0.3–27 ?g C cop? 1 d? 1). C. helgolandicus ingested between 1 and 18 ?g C cop? 1 d? 1 (1–12% body C) from phytoplankton + protozooplankton food sources. The total carbon ingested by Para-Pseudocalanus spp. was lower (0.5–6 ?g cop? 1 d? 1) but this was equivalent to between 6 and 78% of body carbon being ingested daily. Our data suggest that C. helgolandicus selected prey according to size; this was not the case for Para-Pseudocalanus spp. which became more selective as chlorophyll-a concentration increased. Grazing impact of the entire copepod community on protozooplankton was assessed. We found that at non-bloom stations between 12 and 17% of the protozooplankton community was being removed daily by the copepod community, whereas during the peak of the bloom the proportion being removed daily was only 2%. We conclude that during the spring bloom period copepods gained the majority of their carbon from phytoplankton ingestion but during non-bloom periods, protozooplankton and the ciliate M. rubra made a significant contribution to copepod diet.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 7 September 2007
Keywords:
Calanus helgolandicus, Chlorophyll-a, Ingestion, Para-Pseudocalanus spp., Prey preference, Protozooplankton
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 49683
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/49683
ISSN: 0022-0981
PURE UUID: 5d371141-03fb-4220-a1d5-dddd1ee45fcd
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 22 Nov 2007
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 09:57
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
E. Fileman
Author:
T. Smith
Author:
R. Harris
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics