The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Trade and domestic policies under monopolistic competition

Trade and domestic policies under monopolistic competition
Trade and domestic policies under monopolistic competition

Should trade agreements constrain domestic policies? We analyse this question using a model with monopolistic competition and constant-elasticity-of-substitution demand. We develop a welfare decomposition to show that welfare changes induced by trade and domestic policies can be decomposed into consumption and production efficiencies and terms-of-trade effects. We analyse the reasons to sign trade agreements and compare shallow and deep trade agreements, modelled according to GATT-WTO rules. Under monopolistic competition, unlike deep trade agreements, shallow agreements with market access commitments may not achieve efficiency because terms of trade can be improved without reducing market access by increasing the set of foreign firms selling domestically.

0013-0133
892-913
Campolmi, Alessia
26bf441d-b3a8-4899-967b-146be106ac0c
Fadinger, Harald
174de952-49b6-4bd7-a00c-3b577b828b89
Forlati, Chiara
7be0a723-e9b7-4247-8d6f-bfe224d61845
Campolmi, Alessia
26bf441d-b3a8-4899-967b-146be106ac0c
Fadinger, Harald
174de952-49b6-4bd7-a00c-3b577b828b89
Forlati, Chiara
7be0a723-e9b7-4247-8d6f-bfe224d61845

Campolmi, Alessia, Fadinger, Harald and Forlati, Chiara (2025) Trade and domestic policies under monopolistic competition. The Economic Journal, 135 (667), 892-913, [ueae098]. (doi:10.1093/ej/ueae098).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Should trade agreements constrain domestic policies? We analyse this question using a model with monopolistic competition and constant-elasticity-of-substitution demand. We develop a welfare decomposition to show that welfare changes induced by trade and domestic policies can be decomposed into consumption and production efficiencies and terms-of-trade effects. We analyse the reasons to sign trade agreements and compare shallow and deep trade agreements, modelled according to GATT-WTO rules. Under monopolistic competition, unlike deep trade agreements, shallow agreements with market access commitments may not achieve efficiency because terms of trade can be improved without reducing market access by increasing the set of foreign firms selling domestically.

Text
CFF_EJ_2024 - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 16 November 2026.
Request a copy

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 16 November 2024
Published date: 20 January 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 496853
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/496853
ISSN: 0013-0133
PURE UUID: d45aab9c-f9a7-4162-a439-a379cd8d4dee
ORCID for Chiara Forlati: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2914-1504

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Jan 2025 08:25
Last modified: 04 Sep 2025 02:15

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Alessia Campolmi
Author: Harald Fadinger
Author: Chiara Forlati ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×