Consistency of the EU’s decisions on China: An analysis of cooperation and sanctions
Consistency of the EU’s decisions on China: An analysis of cooperation and sanctions
This thesis analyses the EU’s foreign policy on China and aims to explain why the EU, which repeatedly underlines foreign policy coherence in its main treaties, made very different decisions in a short time, including ones that seem to undermine each other. It examines the logic behind the decisions, the key actors involved in the process, and how these actors influenced the shaping of the EU’s decisions. To analyse this data, it makes an innovative synthesis by combining the concept of consistency with Europeanisation theory.
Since its foundation, enhancing foreign policy coherence has always been an objective for the EU, and it has made several structural adjustments to harmonise the foreign policy of its member states. However, the extent to which the EU has achieved this goal remains a contested issue, as can be seen in its decisions regarding China, which was conceptualised as a strategic partner in the early 2000s, but, began to be also defined as a competitor and rival in the late 2010s. This thesis particularly focuses on the cases of the conclusion of the CAI and sanctions imposed due to human rights violations in Xinjiang. It questions the reasons the EU, having just concluded its largest investment deal to date with China, made a decision that jeopardised the deal, resulting in the freezing of the agreement. To answer this, the thesis compares the long-term stances, discourses, and initiatives of a sample of key EU actors influencing foreign policy in terms of vertical and horizontal consistency. It argues that, in dealing with a rising challenge like China, EU member states and institutions were involved in different phases of cooperation and criticism, which impacted the influence they exerted in EU decision-making, and that the simultaneous success of two different logics in influencing the EU causes the seeming inconsistency.
University of Southampton
Tuzgen, Ahmet Bilal
9e01bf89-a6ba-42d8-b87d-9c3c798e6485
2025
Tuzgen, Ahmet Bilal
9e01bf89-a6ba-42d8-b87d-9c3c798e6485
Zwolski, Kamil
eadd4b99-f0db-41b8-a3a1-f71918f09975
Glenn, John
d843e423-d1f9-4be5-b667-8e44a42efff2
Tuzgen, Ahmet Bilal
(2025)
Consistency of the EU’s decisions on China: An analysis of cooperation and sanctions.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 263pp.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
This thesis analyses the EU’s foreign policy on China and aims to explain why the EU, which repeatedly underlines foreign policy coherence in its main treaties, made very different decisions in a short time, including ones that seem to undermine each other. It examines the logic behind the decisions, the key actors involved in the process, and how these actors influenced the shaping of the EU’s decisions. To analyse this data, it makes an innovative synthesis by combining the concept of consistency with Europeanisation theory.
Since its foundation, enhancing foreign policy coherence has always been an objective for the EU, and it has made several structural adjustments to harmonise the foreign policy of its member states. However, the extent to which the EU has achieved this goal remains a contested issue, as can be seen in its decisions regarding China, which was conceptualised as a strategic partner in the early 2000s, but, began to be also defined as a competitor and rival in the late 2010s. This thesis particularly focuses on the cases of the conclusion of the CAI and sanctions imposed due to human rights violations in Xinjiang. It questions the reasons the EU, having just concluded its largest investment deal to date with China, made a decision that jeopardised the deal, resulting in the freezing of the agreement. To answer this, the thesis compares the long-term stances, discourses, and initiatives of a sample of key EU actors influencing foreign policy in terms of vertical and horizontal consistency. It argues that, in dealing with a rising challenge like China, EU member states and institutions were involved in different phases of cooperation and criticism, which impacted the influence they exerted in EU decision-making, and that the simultaneous success of two different logics in influencing the EU causes the seeming inconsistency.
Text
Tuzgen PhD Thesis
- Version of Record
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Mr-Ahmet-Tuzgen (1)
Restricted to Repository staff only
More information
Published date: 2025
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 496920
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/496920
PURE UUID: ac7b8d2e-34b3-44a3-8230-c034461e12e6
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 08 Jan 2025 12:49
Last modified: 08 Feb 2025 02:48
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Ahmet Bilal Tuzgen
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics