The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Valence politics and voting in the 2012 U.S. presidential election

Valence politics and voting in the 2012 U.S. presidential election
Valence politics and voting in the 2012 U.S. presidential election
This paper analyzes voting behavior in the 2012 U.S. presidential election. Using national survey data gathered in the 2012 Political Support in America project, the paper investigates the ability of a valence politics model of electoral choice to account for voting in that election. Multivariate analyses reveal that a valence politics model comprised of judgments about party performance on important issues, flexible partisan attachments, and images of the two major presidential candidates outperforms rival models and provides a parsimonious and powerful explanation of decisions voters made. The analyses show that although several factors had significant effects on the vote, the impact of candidate images was especially strong. Although many voters expressed doubts about Obama's competence, even more were unconvinced that Romney offered a viable alternative. Most voters were unenthusiastic about Romney and this cost him dearly at the ballot box.
0261-3794
462-470
Clarke, Harold
34a60267-a868-4155-847c-fdb2aa5746d1
Reifler, Jason
426301a1-f90b-470d-a076-04a9d716c491
Scotto, Thomas J.
46d397ec-85ac-4a35-9020-552f4b493a77
Stewart, Marianne C.
87f580a7-529d-44bb-af10-d2ad352ad0b2
Whiteley, Paul
546b9a59-6334-4bc2-a95a-85ea9b5e2581
Clarke, Harold
34a60267-a868-4155-847c-fdb2aa5746d1
Reifler, Jason
426301a1-f90b-470d-a076-04a9d716c491
Scotto, Thomas J.
46d397ec-85ac-4a35-9020-552f4b493a77
Stewart, Marianne C.
87f580a7-529d-44bb-af10-d2ad352ad0b2
Whiteley, Paul
546b9a59-6334-4bc2-a95a-85ea9b5e2581

Clarke, Harold, Reifler, Jason, Scotto, Thomas J., Stewart, Marianne C. and Whiteley, Paul (2015) Valence politics and voting in the 2012 U.S. presidential election. Electoral Studies, 40, 462-470. (doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2014.09.011).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This paper analyzes voting behavior in the 2012 U.S. presidential election. Using national survey data gathered in the 2012 Political Support in America project, the paper investigates the ability of a valence politics model of electoral choice to account for voting in that election. Multivariate analyses reveal that a valence politics model comprised of judgments about party performance on important issues, flexible partisan attachments, and images of the two major presidential candidates outperforms rival models and provides a parsimonious and powerful explanation of decisions voters made. The analyses show that although several factors had significant effects on the vote, the impact of candidate images was especially strong. Although many voters expressed doubts about Obama's competence, even more were unconvinced that Romney offered a viable alternative. Most voters were unenthusiastic about Romney and this cost him dearly at the ballot box.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 29 September 2014
e-pub ahead of print date: 8 October 2014
Published date: 10 December 2015

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 497029
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/497029
ISSN: 0261-3794
PURE UUID: 497259c6-1ce5-431a-9d82-880951b9070a
ORCID for Jason Reifler: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1116-7346

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Jan 2025 17:37
Last modified: 21 Jan 2025 03:15

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Harold Clarke
Author: Jason Reifler ORCID iD
Author: Thomas J. Scotto
Author: Marianne C. Stewart
Author: Paul Whiteley

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×