The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Mobile technology use in clinical research examining challenges and implications for health promotion in South Africa: mixed methods study

Mobile technology use in clinical research examining challenges and implications for health promotion in South Africa: mixed methods study
Mobile technology use in clinical research examining challenges and implications for health promotion in South Africa: mixed methods study
Background: the use of mobile technologies in fostering health promotion and healthy behaviors is becoming an increasingly common phenomenon in global health programs. Although mobile technologies have been effective in health promotion initiatives and follow-up research in higher-income countries and concerns have been raised within clinical practice and research in low- and middle-income settings, there is a lack of literature that has qualitatively explored the challenges that participants experience in terms of being contactable through mobile technologies.

Objective: this study aims to explore the challenges that participants experience in terms of being contactable through mobile technologies in a trial conducted in Soweto, South Africa.

Methods: a convergent parallel mixed methods research design was used. In the quantitative phase, 363 young women in the age cohorts 18 to 28 years were contacted telephonically between August 2019 and January 2022 to have a session delivered to them or to be booked for a session. Call attempts initiated by the study team were restricted to only 1 call attempt, and participants who were reached at the first call attempt were classified as contactable (189/363, 52.1%), whereas those whom the study team failed to contact were classified as hard to reach (174/363, 47.9%). Two outcomes of interest in the quantitative phase were “contactability of the participants” and “participants’ mobile number changes,” and these outcomes were analyzed at a univariate and bivariate level using descriptive statistics and a 2-way contingency table. In the qualitative phase, a subsample of young women (20 who were part of the trial for ≥12 months) participated in in-depth interviews and were recruited using a convenience sampling method. A reflexive thematic analysis approach was used to analyze the data using MAXQDA software (version 20; VERBI GmbH).

Results: of the 363 trial participants, 174 (47.9%) were hard to reach telephonically, whereas approximately 189 (52.1%) were easy to reach telephonically. Most participants (133/243, 54.7%) who were contactable did not change their mobile number. The highest percentage of mobile number changes was observed among participants who were hard to reach, with three-quarters of the participants (12/16, 75%) being reported to have changed their mobile number ≥2 times. Eight themes were generated following the analysis of the transcripts, which provided an in-depth account of the reasons why some participants were hard to reach. These included mobile technical issues, coverage issues, lack of ownership of personal cell phones, and unregistered number.

Conclusions: remote data collection remains an important tool in public health research. It could, thus, serve as a hugely beneficial mechanism in connecting with participants while actively leveraging the established relationships with participants or community-based organizations to deliver health promotion and practice.
mobile technologies, health promotion, mixed methods, clinical practices, mobile phone
Mabetha, Khuthala
6b05becb-751a-4c79-b95f-8413ee0c17b1
Soepnel, Larske M
e342b0a4-2e1d-4ae0-b0cf-9f7c274ebad0
Mabena, Gugulethu
92e615b7-ae93-4cf0-809b-4d609f280bba
Motlhatlhedi, Molebogeng
b882c6ed-b0ac-42be-8e69-6897d7fa3c9c
Nyati, Lukhanyo
18d7ac34-0c97-4f40-9195-5eee0a8ed7ff
Norris, Shane A.
1d346f1b-6d5f-4bca-ac87-7589851b75a4
Draper, Catherine E.
5032d1f5-0c2a-44be-8bdb-6e4967d49e14
Mabetha, Khuthala
6b05becb-751a-4c79-b95f-8413ee0c17b1
Soepnel, Larske M
e342b0a4-2e1d-4ae0-b0cf-9f7c274ebad0
Mabena, Gugulethu
92e615b7-ae93-4cf0-809b-4d609f280bba
Motlhatlhedi, Molebogeng
b882c6ed-b0ac-42be-8e69-6897d7fa3c9c
Nyati, Lukhanyo
18d7ac34-0c97-4f40-9195-5eee0a8ed7ff
Norris, Shane A.
1d346f1b-6d5f-4bca-ac87-7589851b75a4
Draper, Catherine E.
5032d1f5-0c2a-44be-8bdb-6e4967d49e14

Mabetha, Khuthala, Soepnel, Larske M, Mabena, Gugulethu, Motlhatlhedi, Molebogeng, Nyati, Lukhanyo, Norris, Shane A. and Draper, Catherine E. (2024) Mobile technology use in clinical research examining challenges and implications for health promotion in South Africa: mixed methods study. JMIR Formative Research, 8, [e48144]. (doi:10.2196/48144).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: the use of mobile technologies in fostering health promotion and healthy behaviors is becoming an increasingly common phenomenon in global health programs. Although mobile technologies have been effective in health promotion initiatives and follow-up research in higher-income countries and concerns have been raised within clinical practice and research in low- and middle-income settings, there is a lack of literature that has qualitatively explored the challenges that participants experience in terms of being contactable through mobile technologies.

Objective: this study aims to explore the challenges that participants experience in terms of being contactable through mobile technologies in a trial conducted in Soweto, South Africa.

Methods: a convergent parallel mixed methods research design was used. In the quantitative phase, 363 young women in the age cohorts 18 to 28 years were contacted telephonically between August 2019 and January 2022 to have a session delivered to them or to be booked for a session. Call attempts initiated by the study team were restricted to only 1 call attempt, and participants who were reached at the first call attempt were classified as contactable (189/363, 52.1%), whereas those whom the study team failed to contact were classified as hard to reach (174/363, 47.9%). Two outcomes of interest in the quantitative phase were “contactability of the participants” and “participants’ mobile number changes,” and these outcomes were analyzed at a univariate and bivariate level using descriptive statistics and a 2-way contingency table. In the qualitative phase, a subsample of young women (20 who were part of the trial for ≥12 months) participated in in-depth interviews and were recruited using a convenience sampling method. A reflexive thematic analysis approach was used to analyze the data using MAXQDA software (version 20; VERBI GmbH).

Results: of the 363 trial participants, 174 (47.9%) were hard to reach telephonically, whereas approximately 189 (52.1%) were easy to reach telephonically. Most participants (133/243, 54.7%) who were contactable did not change their mobile number. The highest percentage of mobile number changes was observed among participants who were hard to reach, with three-quarters of the participants (12/16, 75%) being reported to have changed their mobile number ≥2 times. Eight themes were generated following the analysis of the transcripts, which provided an in-depth account of the reasons why some participants were hard to reach. These included mobile technical issues, coverage issues, lack of ownership of personal cell phones, and unregistered number.

Conclusions: remote data collection remains an important tool in public health research. It could, thus, serve as a hugely beneficial mechanism in connecting with participants while actively leveraging the established relationships with participants or community-based organizations to deliver health promotion and practice.

Text
preprint-48144-accepted - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (880kB)
Text
formative-2024-1-e48144 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (290kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 23 October 2023
Published date: 8 April 2024
Keywords: mobile technologies, health promotion, mixed methods, clinical practices, mobile phone

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 497054
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/497054
PURE UUID: 36075005-7164-403d-b442-3eec215f60ad
ORCID for Shane A. Norris: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7124-3788

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Jan 2025 17:51
Last modified: 11 Jan 2025 02:59

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Khuthala Mabetha
Author: Larske M Soepnel
Author: Gugulethu Mabena
Author: Molebogeng Motlhatlhedi
Author: Lukhanyo Nyati
Author: Shane A. Norris ORCID iD
Author: Catherine E. Draper

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×