Prudence, principle and minimal heuristics: British public opinion toward the use of military force in Afghanistan and Libya
Prudence, principle and minimal heuristics: British public opinion toward the use of military force in Afghanistan and Libya
• Clear pluralities of British survey respondents opposed their nation's military interventions in Afghanistan and Libya.
• Opposition to involvement in the conflicts mostly a function of the costs the missions would impose on the nation and concerns about the morality of the missions.
• Attitudes towards the parties and their leaders are weak predictors of the respondents' attitudes towards involving the nation's military in the conflict.
• Survey experiment reveals the positions leaders and parties took on sending additional British troops into Afghanistan did not prime support or opposition to such a ‘surge’.
Scholarship is divided on the primary drivers of public support for the use of military force. This article addresses this controversy by comparing three competing models of British public opinion towards the use of military force in Afghanistan and Libya. Analyses of national survey data demonstrate that cost-benefit calculations and normative considerations have sizable effects, but leader images and other heuristics have very limited explanatory power. These results are buttressed by experimental evidence showing that leader cues have negligible impacts on attitudes towards participation in a military ‘surge’ in Afghanistan. The minimal role heuristics played in motivating citizen support and opposition to the conflicts in these two countries contrast with their significant relationship to citizen attitudes towards the British intervention in Iraq. These conflicting results suggest that the strength of leader and partisan cues may be animated by the intensity of inter-elite conflict over British involvement in military interventions.
28-55
Reifler, Jason
426301a1-f90b-470d-a076-04a9d716c491
Clarke, Harold D.
024bd31b-1070-4c93-ba39-e12dcf3e82eb
Scotto, Thomas J.
46d397ec-85ac-4a35-9020-552f4b493a77
Sanders, David
c4132517-7bde-45d6-adaf-6859f42cec8e
Stewart, Marianne C.
87f580a7-529d-44bb-af10-d2ad352ad0b2
Whiteley, Paul
546b9a59-6334-4bc2-a95a-85ea9b5e2581
February 2014
Reifler, Jason
426301a1-f90b-470d-a076-04a9d716c491
Clarke, Harold D.
024bd31b-1070-4c93-ba39-e12dcf3e82eb
Scotto, Thomas J.
46d397ec-85ac-4a35-9020-552f4b493a77
Sanders, David
c4132517-7bde-45d6-adaf-6859f42cec8e
Stewart, Marianne C.
87f580a7-529d-44bb-af10-d2ad352ad0b2
Whiteley, Paul
546b9a59-6334-4bc2-a95a-85ea9b5e2581
Reifler, Jason, Clarke, Harold D., Scotto, Thomas J., Sanders, David, Stewart, Marianne C. and Whiteley, Paul
(2014)
Prudence, principle and minimal heuristics: British public opinion toward the use of military force in Afghanistan and Libya.
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16 (1), .
(doi:10.1111/1467-856x.12009).
Abstract
• Clear pluralities of British survey respondents opposed their nation's military interventions in Afghanistan and Libya.
• Opposition to involvement in the conflicts mostly a function of the costs the missions would impose on the nation and concerns about the morality of the missions.
• Attitudes towards the parties and their leaders are weak predictors of the respondents' attitudes towards involving the nation's military in the conflict.
• Survey experiment reveals the positions leaders and parties took on sending additional British troops into Afghanistan did not prime support or opposition to such a ‘surge’.
Scholarship is divided on the primary drivers of public support for the use of military force. This article addresses this controversy by comparing three competing models of British public opinion towards the use of military force in Afghanistan and Libya. Analyses of national survey data demonstrate that cost-benefit calculations and normative considerations have sizable effects, but leader images and other heuristics have very limited explanatory power. These results are buttressed by experimental evidence showing that leader cues have negligible impacts on attitudes towards participation in a military ‘surge’ in Afghanistan. The minimal role heuristics played in motivating citizen support and opposition to the conflicts in these two countries contrast with their significant relationship to citizen attitudes towards the British intervention in Iraq. These conflicting results suggest that the strength of leader and partisan cues may be animated by the intensity of inter-elite conflict over British involvement in military interventions.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 30 January 2013
Published date: February 2014
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 497057
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/497057
ISSN: 1369-1481
PURE UUID: 51670f2e-0a6f-45b5-aec8-330acb656c2d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 Jan 2025 17:52
Last modified: 21 Jan 2025 03:15
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Jason Reifler
Author:
Harold D. Clarke
Author:
Thomas J. Scotto
Author:
David Sanders
Author:
Marianne C. Stewart
Author:
Paul Whiteley
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics