The hazards of correcting myths about health care reform
The hazards of correcting myths about health care reform
Context:
Misperceptions are a major problem in debates about health care reform and other controversial health issues.
Methods:
We conducted an experiment to determine if more aggressive media fact-checking could correct the false belief that the Affordable Care Act would create “death panels.” Participants from an opt-in Internet panel were randomly assigned to either a control group in which they read an article on Sarah Palin’s claims about “death panels” or an intervention group in which the article also contained corrective information refuting Palin.
Findings:
The correction reduced belief in death panels and strong opposition to the reform bill among those who view Palin unfavorably and those who view her favorably but have low political knowledge. However, it backfired among politically knowledgeable Palin supporters, who were more likely to believe in death panels and to strongly oppose reform if they received the correction.
Conclusions:
These results underscore the difficulty of reducing misperceptions about health care reform among individuals with the motivation and sophistication to reject corrective information.
127-132
Nyhan, Brendan
76e1ec80-0af5-432d-9dd6-f7e8237191e4
Reifler, Jason
426301a1-f90b-470d-a076-04a9d716c491
Ubel, Peter
e088cd3e-5c9d-4a89-a5d5-8b3e8e5defbb
February 2013
Nyhan, Brendan
76e1ec80-0af5-432d-9dd6-f7e8237191e4
Reifler, Jason
426301a1-f90b-470d-a076-04a9d716c491
Ubel, Peter
e088cd3e-5c9d-4a89-a5d5-8b3e8e5defbb
Nyhan, Brendan, Reifler, Jason and Ubel, Peter
(2013)
The hazards of correcting myths about health care reform.
Medical Care, .
(doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e318279486b).
Abstract
Context:
Misperceptions are a major problem in debates about health care reform and other controversial health issues.
Methods:
We conducted an experiment to determine if more aggressive media fact-checking could correct the false belief that the Affordable Care Act would create “death panels.” Participants from an opt-in Internet panel were randomly assigned to either a control group in which they read an article on Sarah Palin’s claims about “death panels” or an intervention group in which the article also contained corrective information refuting Palin.
Findings:
The correction reduced belief in death panels and strong opposition to the reform bill among those who view Palin unfavorably and those who view her favorably but have low political knowledge. However, it backfired among politically knowledgeable Palin supporters, who were more likely to believe in death panels and to strongly oppose reform if they received the correction.
Conclusions:
These results underscore the difficulty of reducing misperceptions about health care reform among individuals with the motivation and sophistication to reject corrective information.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: February 2013
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 497089
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/497089
ISSN: 0025-7079
PURE UUID: f1e8f577-a1c8-4176-8d40-8e7518e06ad5
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 14 Jan 2025 16:08
Last modified: 08 Feb 2025 03:17
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Brendan Nyhan
Author:
Jason Reifler
Author:
Peter Ubel
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics