Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election
Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election
Although commentators frequently warn about echo chambers, little is known about the volume or slant of political misinformation that people consume online, the effects of social media and fact checking on exposure, or the effects of political misinformation on behaviour. Here, we evaluate these questions for websites that publish factually dubious content, which is often described as fake news. Survey and web-traffic data from the 2016 US presidential campaign show that supporters of Donald Trump were most likely to visit these websites, which often spread through Facebook. However, these websites made up a small share of people’s information diets on average and were largely consumed by a subset of Americans with strong preferences for pro-attitudinal information. These results suggest that the widespread speculation about the prevalence of exposure to untrustworthy websites has been overstated.
472-480
Guess, Andrew M.
5fcbd18c-f3bc-4a6a-9551-2d460cc66ad0
Nyhan, Brendan
76e1ec80-0af5-432d-9dd6-f7e8237191e4
Reifler, Jason
426301a1-f90b-470d-a076-04a9d716c491
2 March 2020
Guess, Andrew M.
5fcbd18c-f3bc-4a6a-9551-2d460cc66ad0
Nyhan, Brendan
76e1ec80-0af5-432d-9dd6-f7e8237191e4
Reifler, Jason
426301a1-f90b-470d-a076-04a9d716c491
Guess, Andrew M., Nyhan, Brendan and Reifler, Jason
(2020)
Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election.
Nature Human Behaviour, .
(doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0833-x).
Abstract
Although commentators frequently warn about echo chambers, little is known about the volume or slant of political misinformation that people consume online, the effects of social media and fact checking on exposure, or the effects of political misinformation on behaviour. Here, we evaluate these questions for websites that publish factually dubious content, which is often described as fake news. Survey and web-traffic data from the 2016 US presidential campaign show that supporters of Donald Trump were most likely to visit these websites, which often spread through Facebook. However, these websites made up a small share of people’s information diets on average and were largely consumed by a subset of Americans with strong preferences for pro-attitudinal information. These results suggest that the widespread speculation about the prevalence of exposure to untrustworthy websites has been overstated.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 3 February 2020
Published date: 2 March 2020
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 497102
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/497102
ISSN: 2397-3374
PURE UUID: 404b452c-b533-4296-86f1-49c198d82d25
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 14 Jan 2025 16:25
Last modified: 21 Jan 2025 03:15
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Andrew M. Guess
Author:
Brendan Nyhan
Author:
Jason Reifler
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics