The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Understanding innovations in journalistic practice: a field experiment examining motivations for fact-checking

Understanding innovations in journalistic practice: a field experiment examining motivations for fact-checking
Understanding innovations in journalistic practice: a field experiment examining motivations for fact-checking
Why has fact-checking spread so quickly within U.S. political journalism? In the first field experiment conducted among reporters, we varied journalist exposure to messages that highlight either audience demand for fact-checking or the prestige it enjoys within the profession. Our results indicate that messages promoting the high status and journalistic values of fact-checking increased the prevalence of fact-checking coverage, while messages about audience demand were somewhat less successful. These findings suggest that political fact-checking is driven primarily by professional motives within journalism, a finding that helps us understand the process by which the practice spreads within the press as well as the factors that influence the behavior of journalists.
0021-9916
102-138
Graves, Lucas
6b4fba74-d57a-4dd1-8a4c-3e879a066588
Nyhan, Brendan
8db3e34b-68e5-448d-9e60-2bdb31f7f393
Reifler, Jason
426301a1-f90b-470d-a076-04a9d716c491
Graves, Lucas
6b4fba74-d57a-4dd1-8a4c-3e879a066588
Nyhan, Brendan
8db3e34b-68e5-448d-9e60-2bdb31f7f393
Reifler, Jason
426301a1-f90b-470d-a076-04a9d716c491

Graves, Lucas, Nyhan, Brendan and Reifler, Jason (2016) Understanding innovations in journalistic practice: a field experiment examining motivations for fact-checking. Journal of Communication, 66 (1), 102-138. (doi:10.1111/jcom.12198).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Why has fact-checking spread so quickly within U.S. political journalism? In the first field experiment conducted among reporters, we varied journalist exposure to messages that highlight either audience demand for fact-checking or the prestige it enjoys within the profession. Our results indicate that messages promoting the high status and journalistic values of fact-checking increased the prevalence of fact-checking coverage, while messages about audience demand were somewhat less successful. These findings suggest that political fact-checking is driven primarily by professional motives within journalism, a finding that helps us understand the process by which the practice spreads within the press as well as the factors that influence the behavior of journalists.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 8 February 2016

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 497171
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/497171
ISSN: 0021-9916
PURE UUID: 95b9bb51-6fd5-41a8-9d94-fe6dc3196b3e
ORCID for Jason Reifler: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1116-7346

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Jan 2025 17:41
Last modified: 21 Jan 2025 03:15

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Lucas Graves
Author: Brendan Nyhan
Author: Jason Reifler ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×