The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Teaching writing and critical thinking in large political science classes

Teaching writing and critical thinking in large political science classes
Teaching writing and critical thinking in large political science classes
In the interest of developing a combination of teaching techniques designed to maximize efficiency and quality of instruction, we have experimentally tested three separate and relatively common teaching techniques in three large introductory political science classes at a large urban public university. Our results indicate that the (short-answer) skeleton essay approach in large classes does not provide any significant benefit over full writing assignments or even a lack of writing assignments. Essay and multiple-choice testing techniques produce similar results, though both types of testing have their strengths and weaknesses. We conclude that using a blend of the two testing techniques may be the best approach.
1551-2169
155-165
Franklin, Daniel
f7264f70-d22f-4e19-8b88-8d847f397226
Weinberg, Joseph
e066d5d6-9b79-41e0-9918-6cfb512f399f
Reifler, Jason
426301a1-f90b-470d-a076-04a9d716c491
Franklin, Daniel
f7264f70-d22f-4e19-8b88-8d847f397226
Weinberg, Joseph
e066d5d6-9b79-41e0-9918-6cfb512f399f
Reifler, Jason
426301a1-f90b-470d-a076-04a9d716c491

Franklin, Daniel, Weinberg, Joseph and Reifler, Jason (2014) Teaching writing and critical thinking in large political science classes. Journal of Political Science Education, 10 (2), 155-165. (doi:10.1080/15512169.2014.892431).

Record type: Article

Abstract

In the interest of developing a combination of teaching techniques designed to maximize efficiency and quality of instruction, we have experimentally tested three separate and relatively common teaching techniques in three large introductory political science classes at a large urban public university. Our results indicate that the (short-answer) skeleton essay approach in large classes does not provide any significant benefit over full writing assignments or even a lack of writing assignments. Essay and multiple-choice testing techniques produce similar results, though both types of testing have their strengths and weaknesses. We conclude that using a blend of the two testing techniques may be the best approach.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2 May 2014

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 497194
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/497194
ISSN: 1551-2169
PURE UUID: 036a8afe-7d25-4fd5-854e-311eb1464ba6
ORCID for Jason Reifler: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1116-7346

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Jan 2025 18:05
Last modified: 21 Jan 2025 03:15

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Daniel Franklin
Author: Joseph Weinberg
Author: Jason Reifler ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×